《三国演义》《封神演义》比较研究
发布时间：2018-08-13 10:56
【摘要】：《三国演义》和《封神演义》是明代诞生的两部长篇小说,两部作品都取材于历史,且都以“演义”命名,但创作模式、写作手法却有极大的不同。《三国演义》是历史演义的代表,其特点是既忠实于历史,但又不拘泥于史实,做到了历史史实与叙事艺术的结合。《封神演义》的故事背景是武王伐纣的历史,但作者只把这段历史作为小说的基本框架,作者更感兴趣的是“封神”之类的故事,因而将历史神怪化。从而使小说的性质发生了质的变化。两部小说的文化内涵都比较复杂,在历史观、道德观、英雄观等方面有不少相似之处,如“天命”和“人事”、忠和义,等等,都是共同关注的话题,但两书又各有偏重。《三国演义》的基本倾向是“拥刘反曹”,其中有一定的正统观念,但在对刘备、曹操等人物形象的塑造方面更多体现的是民众的道德观念和政治理想。《封神演义》则以“道义”为借口,公然赞美以臣伐君的行为,具有反正统的异端思想。《三国演义》和《封神演义》都写了“天命”和“天数”,写了天命和人事的矛盾,《三国演义》承认天命,但更注重人的主观努力,歌颂的是明知不可为而为之的奋斗精神。《封神演义》则更强调“天命”不可违,写出了人在天命面前的无奈。两书中都塑造了众多英雄形象,《三国演义》评价人物的基本标准是忠和义,塑造了一大批像关羽和诸葛亮这样的英雄,《封神演义》中的人物形象则比较模糊,但突出了英雄的“叛逆”精神,别具一格。两部小说都把战争作为叙事的重点,写了大量的战争场面。《三国演义》注重对战争经验教训的总结,在战争叙事中注重对智谋之类情节的渲染,注重在战争中写人,战争叙事的方法灵活多变。《封神演义》在战争描写方面对《三国演义》多有继承,但更注重对各种阵法之类的描写,突出了交战双方的斗法和斗宝,想象力丰富,各种奇人奇宝令人眼花缭乱,开辟了战争叙事的另一种模式。
[Abstract]:The Romance of the three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Gods are two novels born in the Ming Dynasty. Both of them are based on history and are named after "Romance", but they are created in a creative mode. "Romance of the three Kingdoms" is the representative of historical Romance, which is not only faithful to history, but also not bound by historical facts. The historical facts are combined with the narrative art. The background of the story is the history of Wu King Zhou, but the author only regards this section of history as the basic frame of the novel, and the author is more interested in stories such as "Feng Shen". Therefore, the history of geniuses. Thus, the nature of the novel has undergone a qualitative change. The cultural connotations of the two novels are both quite complex, and there are many similarities in historical, moral and heroic views, such as "destiny" and "personnel", loyalty and righteousness, and so on, which are topics of common concern. The basic tendency of the Romance of the three Kingdoms is to "support Liu and oppose Cao," in which there is a certain sense of orthodoxy, but in the context of Liu Bei, The portrayal of Cao Cao and other characters more embodies the moral idea and political ideal of the people. "the Romance of the Gods" uses "morality" as an excuse to openly praise the behavior of the monarch. They have anti-orthodox heresy thoughts. Both the Romance of the three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Gods and Gods write "Destiny" and "days," and the contradiction between the Destiny and the personnel. The Romance of the three Kingdoms recognizes the destiny, but pays more attention to the subjective efforts of man. Praise is the spirit of struggle that knows it is impossible to do it. The Romance of the Gods emphasizes that the "destiny" must not be violated, and writes about the helplessness of man in the face of the decree of Heaven. In both books, many heroic images have been created. The basic criteria for evaluating characters in the Romance of the three Kingdoms are loyalty and righteousness, and a large number of heroes like Guan Yu and Zhuge Liang have been created, while the characters in the Romance of the Gods are rather vague. But outstanding hero's "rebellious" spirit, unique. Both novels focus on war and write a large number of war scenes. The Romance of the three Kingdoms lays stress on summing up the experience and lessons of war, on exaggerating plots such as resourcefulness in war narration, and on writing people in war. The narrative method of war is flexible and changeable. In the description of war, the Romance of the Gods inherits the Romance of the three Kingdoms, but pays more attention to the description of various formation methods, which highlights the fighting methods and treasures of the warring parties, and has a rich imagination. All kinds of strange people Qibao dazzling, opened up another mode of war narrative.
【学位授予单位】：陕西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.41
本文编号：2180765
[Abstract]:The Romance of the three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Gods are two novels born in the Ming Dynasty. Both of them are based on history and are named after "Romance", but they are created in a creative mode. "Romance of the three Kingdoms" is the representative of historical Romance, which is not only faithful to history, but also not bound by historical facts. The historical facts are combined with the narrative art. The background of the story is the history of Wu King Zhou, but the author only regards this section of history as the basic frame of the novel, and the author is more interested in stories such as "Feng Shen". Therefore, the history of geniuses. Thus, the nature of the novel has undergone a qualitative change. The cultural connotations of the two novels are both quite complex, and there are many similarities in historical, moral and heroic views, such as "destiny" and "personnel", loyalty and righteousness, and so on, which are topics of common concern. The basic tendency of the Romance of the three Kingdoms is to "support Liu and oppose Cao," in which there is a certain sense of orthodoxy, but in the context of Liu Bei, The portrayal of Cao Cao and other characters more embodies the moral idea and political ideal of the people. "the Romance of the Gods" uses "morality" as an excuse to openly praise the behavior of the monarch. They have anti-orthodox heresy thoughts. Both the Romance of the three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Gods and Gods write "Destiny" and "days," and the contradiction between the Destiny and the personnel. The Romance of the three Kingdoms recognizes the destiny, but pays more attention to the subjective efforts of man. Praise is the spirit of struggle that knows it is impossible to do it. The Romance of the Gods emphasizes that the "destiny" must not be violated, and writes about the helplessness of man in the face of the decree of Heaven. In both books, many heroic images have been created. The basic criteria for evaluating characters in the Romance of the three Kingdoms are loyalty and righteousness, and a large number of heroes like Guan Yu and Zhuge Liang have been created, while the characters in the Romance of the Gods are rather vague. But outstanding hero's "rebellious" spirit, unique. Both novels focus on war and write a large number of war scenes. The Romance of the three Kingdoms lays stress on summing up the experience and lessons of war, on exaggerating plots such as resourcefulness in war narration, and on writing people in war. The narrative method of war is flexible and changeable. In the description of war, the Romance of the Gods inherits the Romance of the three Kingdoms, but pays more attention to the description of various formation methods, which highlights the fighting methods and treasures of the warring parties, and has a rich imagination. All kinds of strange people Qibao dazzling, opened up another mode of war narrative.
【学位授予单位】：陕西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 雷勇;崔春雨;;《三国演义》战争书写及其范型意义[J];陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版);2016年01期
2 李静;;天命之外的困惑——《封神演义》的伦理困境及其解决[J];南京师范大学文学院学报;2013年04期
3 陈西川;;《三国演义》一部战争的艺术[J];作家;2012年22期
4 孙倩倩;;浅谈《三国演义》中的非典型性英雄观[J];文教资料;2012年33期
5 李培健;曾良;;论天命观对《三国演义》叙事机制的影响[J];明清小说研究;2012年04期
6 沈伯俊;;《三国演义》与政治智慧[J];中共四川省委省级机关党校学报;2012年05期
7 李培健;曾良;;论《三国演义》中的天命观[J];内江师范学院学报;2012年03期
8 黄晋;;《三国演义》中的谋略描写及其对明清军事领域的影响[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2012年02期
9 刘蓓萱;;解读《封神演义》的命运观[J];湖北函授大学学报;2011年03期
10 雷勇;;《三国演义》的创作模式及其“范型”意义[J];陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 冯军;《封神演义》诠释史论[D];山东大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 崔春雨;明代长篇白话小说中的战争叙事[D];陕西理工学院;2016年
2 殷茜;《三国演义》与《荷马史诗》比较研究[D];陕西理工学院;2011年
3 李国帅;近现代三国学研究[D];山东师范大学;2010年
4 田静;《三国演义》智谋描写初探[D];山东大学;2007年
5 李艳蕾;《三国演义》的空间叙事[D];曲阜师范大学;2003年
，本文编号：2180765
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2180765.html
