水口园林评价体系研究

发布时间：2018-04-23 10:00

本文选题：水口园林 + 评价体系　；参考：《安徽农业大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：中国园林作为世界上三大园林体系之一,历史悠久、文化底蕴深厚,在世界园林中被称为“园林之母”。水口园林作为一种具有地域色彩的园林形式,其不仅是徽州古村落的重要构成部分,也是徽州文化的重要组成部分。水口园林依托村落水口处的自然环境,融入风水思想,营造成村落的公共风景园林,使之成为公共园林的雏形。随着近几年徽州古村落的开发利用,很多村落的水口园林在开发利用时没有得到很好的保护与利用。为了更好的保护徽州古村落的水口园林,众多的学者对徽州古村落和水口园林进行了研究,但综合目前来看,对水口园林的评价研究较少,而在实践中又急需一种评价体系来对水口园林进行合理的等级划分。本文在借鉴其他领域评价体系研究的基础上,对水口园林评价体系的构建进行了深入研究。本研究首先较为全面的阐述了中国园林的起源与发展及其研究动态,分析了本研究的内容与范围、技术路线等内容,然后从景观美学评价出发,构建了一套方便实用的水口园林评价体系,并利用南屏、屏山、呈坎、唐模四个村落的水口园林进行实例验证。主要研究内容与成果如下:1、从景观美学评价角度出发,借鉴其他领域评价体系研究,确定利用层次分析法和模糊综合评价相结合的方式来建立水口园林评价体系。2、确定水口园林评价体系的各评价因子并根据层次分析法相关原则计算出各因子的权重分配。经过计算各评价因子权重大小为:准则层B各因子排序为自然环境B_1(0.48968)生态环境B_3(0.20821)社会人文环境B_4(0.16676)空间环境B_2(0.13536);一级指标层C各因子排序为植物景观C_2(0.25387)水系景C_3(0.16393)生态防护C_7(0.14420)社会服务功能C_9(0.10711)水口建筑景观C_1(0.10434)地形地貌C_8(0.08206)空间环境协调C_6(0.04813)空间环境布局C_5(0.04618)历史文化底蕴C_(10)(0.02914)空间序列景观C_4(0.02103)。3、利用构建的水口园林评价体系对徽州地区的南屏、屏山、呈坎、唐模四处水口园林进行实例验证,计算得出综合评价值V并对其进行等级划分。评价结果如下:V(南屏)=8.39417,综合品质P值隶属等级为I级;V(屏山)=7.22886,综合品质P值隶属等级为II级;V(呈坎)=8.06310,综合品质P值隶属等级为I级;V(唐模)=8.37043,综合品质P值隶属等级为I级。
[Abstract]:As one of the three major garden systems in the world, Chinese gardens have a long history and profound cultural background, and are called "the mother of gardens" in the world. As a kind of garden form with regional color, Shuikou garden is not only an important part of ancient villages in Huizhou, but also an important part of Huizhou culture. Relying on the natural environment of Shuikou village, Shuikou garden is integrated with geomantic thought to create the public landscape garden of the village and make it the embryonic form of the public garden. With the development and utilization of ancient villages in Huizhou in recent years, the Shuikou gardens in many villages have not been well protected and utilized. In order to better protect the Shuikou gardens of Huizhou ancient villages, many scholars have studied the ancient villages and gardens in Huizhou, but at present, the evaluation of Shuikou gardens is less. In practice, an evaluation system is urgently needed to classify Shuikou garden reasonably. Based on the study of evaluation system in other fields, the construction of evaluation system of Shuikou garden is studied in this paper. In this paper, the origin and development of Chinese landscape architecture and its research trends are described, and the contents and scope of the research, the technical route and so on are analyzed, and then the evaluation of landscape aesthetics is carried out. A set of convenient and practical evaluation system of Shuikou garden was constructed, and the Shuikou garden in four villages of Nanping, Pingshan, Chengkan and Tangmu was used to verify it. The main research contents and results are as follows: 1. From the perspective of landscape aesthetics evaluation, we can learn from the research of evaluation system in other fields. The evaluation system of Shuikou garden is established by the combination of AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The evaluation factors of the evaluation system are determined and the weight distribution of each factor is calculated according to the relevant principles of AHP. The weight of each evaluation factor is calculated as follows: criterion layer B factors rank as natural environment B1D 0.48368) ecological environment B3D 0.20821) Social and humanistic environment B4U 0.16676) space environment B2C1353636; Grade C factors rank as plant landscape C20.25387) Water landscape C30.16393) Ecological landscape C30.16393) C _ (9 / 0. 10434) C _ (1 / 0. 10434)) Topographic geomorphology C _ (8 / 0. 020)) Spatial Environment Coordination C _ (60.04813)) Spatial Environment layout C _ (5 / 0. 046 ~ 46 ~ 18)) Historical and Cultural background: C _ (4) 0. 029 ~ 14) Space sequence Landscape C4D ~ (0.02103). 3. Using the constructed evaluation system of Shuikou Gardens to the south screen of Huizhou area. Pingshan, Chengkan, Tang model were verified by examples, and the comprehensive evaluation value V was calculated and classified. The results of evaluation were as follows: 1: v (Nanpingjiao 8.39417). The total quality P value was I grade V (Pingshan 7.22886), the comprehensive quality P value was II grade V (8.06310), the comprehensive quality P value was I grade (Tang Mou 8.37043 43), the comprehensive quality P grade was I grade.
【学位授予单位】：安徽农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU986

【相似文献】