滇西北香格里拉市生态资产变化及其生态环境效应研究
[Abstract]:In the process of increasing contradiction between social economic demand and resource and environment protection, people gradually realize that the ecological system has a stealth service function besides the natural resources used directly by human beings, and the traditional economic growth at the expense of the ecological environment and the consumption of natural resources. The way of social development has been incapable. To meet the overall requirements of human sustainable development, the assessment of ecological assets at the core of the value of natural resources and ecosystem services has become the focus of current research. In the study area of Shangri-La, Northwest Yunnan, the Landsat 1 MSS, Landsat5 TM, Landsat7 ETM+, Landsat8 TM in 1974, 1989, 2003 and 2013 respectively. Like the basic information source, the spatial distribution area of various types of land use, vegetation coverage and soil erosion data, and three evaluation systems and methods of ecological assets, landscape pattern and ecological environment quality were obtained by RS and GIS interpretation processing, and the ecological property changes and ecological environmental effects of Shangri-La in the last 40 years were determined. The main research contents and results are as follows: (1) the ecological assets of Shangri-La in the last 40 years have been declining in.1974 years. In 1989, 2003, and 2013, the ecological assets were 13 billion 836 million yuan, 12 billion 955 million yuan, 11 billion 546 million yuan, 12 billion 359 million yuan respectively, and the output value of the raw assets per unit area was 12122.75 yuan / (year hm2), 11350.84 yuan / (year? H). M2), 10116.37 yuan / (year? Hm2), 10828.74 yuan / (year? Hm2). The top four of the total assets in the 11 villages and towns in the jurisdiction are GEZAN Township, Jiang Town, Dong Wang Township and Luoji Township, four villages and towns account for more than 52% of the city's ecological assets, and the first three villages and towns of the unit area ecological capital output value are in turn Jin Jiang Town, Luoji township. From the ecological system type, the most widely distributed area of the forest ecosystem is the most important output of the ecological assets, and its output value accounts for 82.89%-84.24% of the total assets of the city; the ecological system value of the shrub land accounts for 7.57%-12.17% of the total assets of the whole city; the ecological system value of the grassland accounts for the 0.27%-5.17% of the total assets of the city, and the other types of ecosystem. The value of total output value is less than 5%. (2) the value of ecosystem services of different grades in Shangri-La city has obvious differences and changes in the value of.4 class I ecosystem services are: regulation service? Support service? Supply service? Cultural services. From the results of years of research, the value of the 9 classes of class two ecosystem services The following are: soil formation and protection? Water conservation? Gas regulation? Biodiversity conservation? Climate regulation? Raw material production? Waste treatment? Entertainment culture? Food production. There are obvious changes in various ecosystem services during the research period of nearly 40 years, of which the value of food production and waste treatment service is in 1989, and 2003 is on the turning point. In addition to the change of "N" pattern, the value of the remaining 7 types of services was "reduced" as a turning point in 2003. (3) the heterogeneity and diversity of the landscape pattern in Shangri-La in the last 40 years increased. From 1974 to 2013, the number of patches increased by 5674, the average patch area decreased by 335.0141hm2, the edge density increased by 22.3759m/hm2, and the Shannon diversity index The increase of 0.2037, Shannon average index increased by 0.0926, indicating that the landscape diversity in Shangri-La was slightly strengthened during the study period, but the degree of landscape fragmentation was weakened, the degree of fragmentation increased and heterogeneity was enhanced. (4) the ecological environment quality of the city of Shangri-La declined in the last 40 years for.1974 years, in 1989, 2003, and 2013, the ecological ring of Shangri-La city. The overall quality index of the environment is 66.28,66.12,62.61,66.03, and the overall quality of the ecological environment has no violent changes. The grade reaches a good (but moderate level). It is basically suitable for human survival. From the result of the landscape pattern and the ecological environment quality evaluation system, the ecological environment of Shangri-La city in the last 40 years' research period is with the ecological assets. Due to the large span of time and space, the availability of data and the continuous improvement of the research system, the research results have some limitations, and the related research still needs to be studied in depth.
【学位授予单位】:云南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:X196;X171.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 范小杉;高吉喜;;生态资产损耗评估及应用模型研究初探[J];生态经济(学术版);2007年02期
2 张淑英,陈云浩,李晓兵,潘耀忠,李京,史培军;内蒙古生态资产测量及生态建设研究[J];资源科学;2004年03期
3 陈志良;吴志峰;夏念和;程炯;刘平;;中国生态资产估价研究进展[J];生态环境;2007年02期
4 宋鹏飞;郝占庆;;生态资产评估的若干问题探讨[J];应用生态学报;2007年10期
5 张玉彪;李阳兵;安裕伦;彭思涛;;喀斯特山地生态资产演变研究——贵阳市为例[J];地球与环境;2012年03期
6 王红岩;高志海;李增元;王t+瑜;白黎娜;王志波;吴俊君;;县级生态资产价值评估——以河北丰宁县为例[J];生态学报;2012年22期
7 刘家福;孙洪泉;占文凤;;长江三角洲地区生态资产变化驱动力分析[J];水土保持研究;2013年01期
8 李昭阳;汤洁;孙平安;王晨野;;松嫩平原生态资产遥感测量与生态分区研究[J];生态经济;2008年05期
9 周可法;陈曦;张清;孙莉;杨又陵;张海波;程宛文;刘朝霞;;天山北坡生态资产的动态评估及人类活动响应[J];干旱区地理;2010年06期
10 李晶;任志远;;陕北黄土高原生态资产与区域生态安全程度研究[J];干旱区研究;2007年03期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 胡聃;王如松;;生态资产价值的空间计量方法——太湖流域实例分析[A];新世纪 新机遇 新挑战——知识创新和高新技术产业发展(下册)[C];2001年
2 戴波;;生态资产评估研究综述[A];云龙学术会议论文集[C];2003年
3 陈志良;;生态资产评估技术研究进展[A];中国环境科学学会2009年学术年会论文集(第三卷)[C];2009年
4 陈鹏;廖连招;汤坤贤;;基于遥感与GIS的厦门市陆地生态资产评估研究[A];发挥资源科技优势 保障西部创新发展——中国自然资源学会2011年学术年会论文集(上册)[C];2011年
5 沈蔚;彭光雄;;湖南省生态资产遥感测量与GDP空间分布研究[A];全国国土资源与环境遥感应用技术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
6 刘梅娟;温作民;魏远竹;;森林生态资产会计确认与计量研究[A];“环境会计与西部经济发展” 学术年会论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 董雅文;生态资产问题的全新探索[N];中华读书报;2002年
2 采访人 本报见习记者 李苑;生态资源怎样转化为生态资产?[N];中国环境报;2014年
3 本报记者 王娅莉;生态资产是国家竞争力重要组成部分[N];中国质量报;2005年
4 本报特约撰稿人 陈文祥;为水库生态资产“估价”[N];人民长江报;2006年
5 记者 张晶;让生态资产和GDP同样重要[N];人民政协报;2014年
6 本报记者 常丽君 范建;绿色GDP核算何时能回归?[N];科技日报;2008年
7 记者 李禾;环保机构将对三江源生态资产进行评估[N];科技日报;2014年
8 本报记者 杨健;浙江加紧绿色GDP核算试验[N];解放日报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 王方;祁连山自然保护区生态资产价值评估研究[D];兰州大学;2012年
2 焦彩霞;基于遥感和GIS的湿地生态资产定量研究[D];南京师范大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 代伟;滇西北香格里拉市生态资产变化及其生态环境效应研究[D];云南师范大学;2015年
2 潘继亚;滇西北香格里拉生态资产遥感估算初步研究[D];云南师范大学;2015年
3 丁彬;乡村单元生态资产评估体系与动态管理信息系统的创建[D];山东大学;2015年
4 刘霞;基于遥感的福建省生态资产动态监测研究[D];福建师范大学;2011年
5 李计英;福建省生态资产遥感估算及其价值评价[D];福建师范大学;2010年
6 郑绪玲;哈尔滨市生态资产遥感测量评估[D];东北农业大学;2014年
7 罗小平;江西省生态资产估算及应用研究[D];江西师范大学;2008年
8 苗正红;吉林省生态资产遥感定量评估[D];东北师范大学;2010年
9 杨雪婷;重庆市2000年和2010年生态资产变化研究[D];重庆师范大学;2015年
10 夏艳;上海海岸带生态资产评估方法研究[D];华东师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:2164124
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/2164124.html