朱紫之辨:传钱

发布时间：2018-05-05 19:10

本文选题：钱选 + 蹴鞠图　；参考：《中国国家博物馆馆刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：2015至2016年间上海博物馆的"吴湖帆收藏大展"中有一卷传元代钱选《蹴鞠图》,然该图存在颇多疑点。第一,吴湖帆在其所藏《蹴鞠图》拖尾上抄录了明代文徵明的题识,其中人物的特征与画面完全不能吻合。第二,该《蹴鞠图》上收藏印最早为明人,且钱选自题书法和款印均有许多疑点。第三,《蹴鞠图》是否有超越画面之外的文化涵义也是值得深入探讨的问题。本文采用探索历史情境与人物服饰、相貌和活动特征的方法,从宋人较为可信的文献史料出发,结合正史载录,重新还原了画中六人的真实身份以及人物关系背后的政治隐喻。同时,笔者在研究中发现,"君臣蹴鞠图"已经成为中国古代的视觉母题之一,历代有不少文人曾为该母题作过题跋和诠释,文中解释了宋代后人对"六人蹴鞠"图式的认识与原作之意的差别。最后,本文对吴湖帆先生收藏该画并加以题识的原意作了说明。
[Abstract]:From 2015 to 2016, the Shanghai Museum's Wu Hu Fan Collection Exhibition contains a volume of money selected from Yuan Dynasty and Cuju, but there are many doubtful points in this picture. First, Wu Hufan copied the Ming Dynasty Wen Zhengming's knowledge on the tail of his hiding cuju, in which the characters' characteristics and pictures could not be matched at all. Second, the collection and printing on Cuju is the earliest Ming people, and money selected from calligraphy and printing have a lot of doubts. Third, whether Cuju has the cultural meaning beyond the screen is also a question worthy of further discussion. In this paper, the author uses the method of exploring historical situation and character dress, appearance and activity characteristics, starting from the more credible historical documents of Song Dynasty and combining with the official history record, restores the true identity of the six people in the painting and the political metaphor behind the relationship between the characters. At the same time, the author found that "Junchengju Pictures" has become one of the visual motifs in ancient China. This paper explains the difference between the understanding of "six people Cuju" schema and the meaning of the original work. Finally, the paper explains the original meaning of Wu Hufan's collection of the painting.
【作者单位】：上海戏剧学院舞台美术系;
【基金】：2015年国家社科基金“西方汉学家视域中的中国视觉艺术史研究”(项目编号:15BWW014)阶段成果
【分类号】：J212

【相似文献】