20世纪上半叶中国人物画线型艺术的衍变与特征研究
[Abstract]:Line is the most important expression of Chinese figure painting, it changes with the development of society. This paper summarizes the general characteristics of line art of figure painting in various periods of Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming, Qing and Republic of China. The difference between the line art of figure painting in the first half of the 20th century and the lines of figure painting in previous dynasties is analyzed, and the evolution and characteristics of the line art in this period are discussed, as well as the reasons for the transformation of line type. The thesis is divided into five parts: the first chapter briefly introduces the significance of this thesis, the current research situation and the basic concept of "line art"; The second chapter mainly analyzes the lines in the figure painting works of the important painters in Tang, Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties. Through the analysis and comparison of a large number of image data, it summarizes the development and overall characteristics of the figure painting lines in each period. For the next chapter of the discussion to do the necessary groundwork and analysis; The third chapter is the main part of this paper. Firstly, it analyzes the development of figure painting in Qing Dynasty and the awakening of line art in the late Qing Dynasty, such as Ren Weichang, Ren Bonian and others. Then it concretely analyzes the concentrated exploration of figure painting lines by a large number of painters in the north and south of the Republic of China, and finally, combs the development of figure painting line art in each period of history by synthesizing the previous chapter. This paper expounds the transformation and development of the line art of figure painting in the first half of the 20th century. The fourth chapter discusses the main reasons of the transformation and development of the figure painting line art in the first half of the 20th century; the fifth chapter summarizes the three main line art characteristics through the comprehensive analysis of the figure painting lines of this period. The main research results of this paper can be summarized as follows: the lines of figure painting in the first half of the 20th century have evolved from neat and rigorous sketches since the Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties into a coherent one due to the influence of traditional writing, material tools and commercial economy. Wielding the freedom of rapid tick, and form this period of free writing, strong lyric and non-repeatable line art features.
【学位授予单位】:中央民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:J212
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶峰;;中国画中“线”的审美特征[J];戏剧之家;2017年01期
2 崔宇;;浅析中国人物画中“线”的发展与变革[J];参花(下);2016年10期
3 赵权利;;《琉璃堂人物图》与《文苑图》的艺术比较——兼论周文矩的“战笔”[J];荣宝斋;2016年08期
4 O@曼曼;;论改琦仕女画中女性形象的审美特征[J];现代装饰(理论);2016年08期
5 李永强;;钱选在元初画坛的真实地位及其逐步消隐的原因[J];南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计);2016年04期
6 陈晓伟;;《元世祖出猎图》流传考略[J];中国国家博物馆馆刊;2016年06期
7 刘慧栋;;陈少梅绘画艺术研究[J];艺术品鉴;2016年06期
8 廖曦;顾平;田书秀;;梁楷《释迦出山图》之图像研究[J];艺术百家;2016年03期
9 王永梅;;陈洪绶人物画用线风格成因探析[J];美与时代(下);2016年02期
10 陶义美;;傅抱石人物画的风格特征[J];大舞台;2015年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 茅子良;;胡也佛的铁线游丝和清健流美[N];东方早报;2013年
2 茅子良;;“游丝描”勾线绝活[N];东方早报;2011年
3 茅子良;;“画小人书比画国画还要难”[N];东方早报;2011年
4 薛永年;;不容忽视的陈少梅及其传派[N];中国文化报;2009年
5 刘曦林;;笔墨的纯化与线意的拓展[N];文艺报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前7条
1 刘胜洋;论中国人物画的线[D];中国艺术研究院;2016年
2 杨臻臻;意写奇崛传精神—陈洪绶人物画造型语言特征研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
3 宫力;海灌百川—海派绘画在民国时期的影响力探究[D];上海大学;2015年
4 喻颖;中国线条艺术审美范畴论[D];华中师范大学;2013年
5 方正;中国人物画笔线特质研究[D];中国美术学院;2012年
6 付爱民;少数民族地区旅游形象设计中的景观色彩设计[D];中央民族大学;2006年
7 林若熹;线意志[D];暨南大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘静逸;元代赵雍工笔人马画风格技法研究[D];中国艺术研究院;2016年
2 张慧;李公麟白描绘画研究[D];河北师范大学;2015年
3 林];浅析张大千三顾敦煌对其艺术风格的影响[D];福建师范大学;2015年
4 王惠惠;任伯年工笔人物画中的线描样式在创作实践中的应用[D];杭州师范大学;2015年
5 周倩倩;丁云鹏人物画艺术研究[D];安徽大学;2015年
6 尹延坤;吴道子绘画的用线艺术探析[D];山东理工大学;2015年
7 李光蕾;仇英《汉宫春晓图》研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
8 文波;众有之本 万象之根[D];山东师范大学;2014年
9 曹绮;唐寅绘画艺术研究[D];云南师范大学;2014年
10 亓晓庆;张大千绘画艺术思想研究[D];山东师范大学;2014年
,本文编号:2310953
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huihuayishu/2310953.html