黄宾虹与贾科梅蒂绘画的共同性
[Abstract]:Through the investigation and analysis of Huang Binhong and Giacometti's painting works, this paper combines their own practice of painting, starting from the essence of their paintings and combining with the picture materials, finds that the two painters have their own painting characteristics. At the same time, there is a corresponding commonality. The birth of art and the birth of mankind in a sense can be said to be equally important. As a special form of human activity, the appearance of art is the need of human nature. However, the works of Huang Binhong and Giacometti both pursue a high artistic thought in terms of Chinese traditional painting and western modern painting. As a unique form of art, the appearance of painting is a boat in the ocean of art, and the process from boat to aircraft carrier is unpredictable. But the course of human pursuit of beauty has never changed. The earliest paintings were left as footprints of upright walking, and beauty came into being. Art comes into being, so what is art? I have always believed that beauty in works of art is never the result of three pursuits, nor does it arise without cause, as beauty does not disappear easily. And painting through the form of works of art is also not accidental. The essence of painting works is not drawn because the regional environment and the humanistic background produce different results. Because all this is around the existence of man and produce a special result. The appearance of this special art form is inseparable from vision, and in painting this kind of vision is collectively called "visual language", and this "visual language" distinguishes physics from vision. The physical explanation for vision is that vision receives electromagnetic stimulation within a certain wavelength range of the external environment through the peripheral sensory organ (eye) of the visual system. The subjective sensation obtained by coding and analyzing the related parts of the central nervous system. The external information that people perceive to a great extent comes from the visual senses. However, the traditional works of art are purely the product of the visual senses. The effects brought by this kind of visual senses are similar in a certain sense. Secondly, It is not difficult to return to the language form of the picture from the vision itself. I mainly focus on this paper. What is art? And pursue the final answer: what is "truth"? In the Dictionary of Modern Chinese, "Truth" is interpreted as follows: the true truth, that is, the objective object image and its laws are correctly reflected in human consciousness. Because all the formal activities of art cannot get rid of the existence of human beings, it can also be said that works of art also exist without artists. Art, as a special form, appears in the living environment of human beings, and its structure revolves around the objective reality. That is to say; Art is the reflection of objective life, art high and life. From the point of view of art history, whether from the theory of harmony and the concept of middle, nothing but the real life can not be separated from the real life, because the real life is the source of the artist's artistic creation. Only through the deep experience of objective life, will there be enthusiasm and motivation of creation. Because artistic creation can create infinite inevitability only by recreating objective and concrete images. The life of art is that the artist will "put his subjective cognition of the objective world" into his works of art, and create it with an unprecedented state of masking. It can be imagined that the work created in this way is bound to be moving.
【学位授予单位】:湖北美术学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:J205
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贾科梅蒂 ,赛尔维斯特 ,杜义盛;走进心理的真实——贾科梅蒂谈创作[J];美术观察;2000年02期
2 李力;贾科梅蒂:广场上的孤独者[J];美术观察;2001年09期
3 李婷;;相像:现出和消失之中的模棱两可——贾科梅蒂后期人像分析[J];美苑;2007年06期
4 李婷;;直观和现象——贾科梅蒂的视觉概观[J];同济大学学报(社会科学版);2007年06期
5 滕小松;;贾科梅蒂雕塑草稿的“瞬间叠加”[J];雕塑;2010年03期
6 赵楠楠;;贾科梅蒂的艺术隐喻[J];太原城市职业技术学院学报;2013年04期
7 陈克;;疯癫的审视 贾科梅蒂创作心理探视[J];艺术界;2006年04期
8 张盼;;贾科梅蒂的世纪之影[J];颂雅风·艺术月刊;2012年12期
9 连醒;欧阳冬华;;浅析贾科梅蒂之《艺术家的母亲》[J];青春岁月;2013年04期
10 王琴;;瞬间与永恒——浅谈贾科梅蒂的艺术特色[J];美术大观;2006年04期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 鲍义来;;黄宾虹与“徽学”的提出[A];安徽省徽学学会第二届理事会暨学术研讨会论文集[C];2003年
2 鲍义来;;黄宾虹的敦煌情结[A];第二届郭煌历史档案与徽州历史档案开发利用研讨会论文集[C];2002年
3 钱忠平;;也说黄宾虹[A];2006年当代艺术与批评理论研讨会论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 钟禾;1.043亿美元 全球最贵艺术品诞生[N];中国商报;2010年
2 鲍义来;2005年走近黄宾虹[N];安徽日报;2005年
3 方利山;重新认识黄宾虹[N];黄山日报;2005年
4 范曾;黄宾虹论(上)[N];美术报;2006年
5 范曾;黄宾虹论(下)[N];美术报;2006年
6 马明宸;黄宾虹对“整理国故”文化主张的实践[N];中国艺术报;2011年
7 王鸿宾;大气磅礴黄宾虹[N];河南日报;2000年
8 俞宏理;黄宾虹的三个时期[N];黄山日报;2005年
9 陈履生;今天如何面对黄宾虹的所爱所恨[N];美术报;2004年
10 马行提;谒黄宾虹故居[N];人民日报海外版;2000年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 李秦;视觉的追问—贾科梅蒂绘画空间研究[D];西安美术学院;2016年
2 金元卿;黄宾虹思想及其绘画美学演进之研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2003年
3 方辉;黄宾虹“国画民学”论研究[D];中国艺术研究院;2017年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 丰锐;黄宾虹与贾科梅蒂绘画的共同性[D];湖北美术学院;2017年
2 杨延东;贾科梅蒂的现实与非现实[D];河北师范大学;2014年
3 叶霞;谈绘画空间的建构—贾科梅蒂式的存在与罗斯科式的虚无[D];杭州师范大学;2015年
4 卫瑞国;贾科梅蒂与塞尚绘画艺术之比较[D];山西大学;2014年
5 鲍明明;形式的纯粹—贾科梅蒂绘画的线性表达形式研究[D];合肥工业大学;2015年
6 刘爱妃;观看的哲学—贾科梅蒂绘画的形式与语言研究[D];北京服装学院;2017年
7 宗慧;贾科梅蒂的具象表现绘画研究[D];西北师范大学;2016年
8 陈冲;浅谈贾科梅蒂雕塑的空间外延[D];中央美术学院;2017年
9 王翠霞;回到视觉本身[D];中国美术学院;2010年
10 邬彦君;浅谈贾科梅蒂的创作方式[D];中国美术学院;2015年
,本文编号:2423529
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huihuayishu/2423529.html