审美趣味的演绎与变迁——兼论布尔迪厄对康德美学的反思与超越

发布时间：2017-12-27 08:41

本文关键词：审美趣味的演绎与变迁——兼论布尔迪厄对康德美学的反思与超越　出处：《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：西方现代美学思想一改古希腊以来的审美传统,引发了美学领域的巨大变革:一方面,"美学"成为独立专门的研究学科;另一方面,思想家们自美的研究转向了针对自身或者群体的"审美趣味"的思考。在此背景下,布尔迪厄批判康德阐述的"趣味判断"及其契机,尤其针对其本质主义与普遍主义的观念,突出了以阶级阶层为核心的"趣味区隔"、以场域为架构的"主体性趣味",旨在建立"科学的社会学"。但是,布尔迪厄以社会学理论来阐释审美趣味,把审美等同于意识形态和一般社会文化产品,也产生了把美学视角和审美的超越性排斥在外的问题。
[Abstract]:The thought of modern western aesthetics to aesthetic tradition since ancient Greece, led to great changes in the field of Aesthetics: on the one hand, "Aesthetics" has become the subject of independent special; on the other hand, the thinkers to think for itself or groups of "aesthetic taste" from the United States of. In this context, Bourdieu's critique of Kant's taste judgment on the "" and the opportunity, especially for the essentialism and universalism of the concept, and to highlight the class as the core of the "interesting segment", the field for the framework of the "main interest", to establish "the sociology of science". However, Bourdieu's social theory to explain the aesthetic taste, aesthetic ideology and equivalent to the general social and cultural products, also has the aesthetic perspective and aesthetic transcendence outside the problem.
【作者单位】：厦门大学外文学院;
【基金】：厦门大学外文学院繁荣哲学社会科学基金项目(0650-Y07200)资助
【分类号】：B83-091
【正文快照】： 哲学家如何看待“美”?“美”究竟是客观事物本身还是事物的属性,是主体自身还是主体的感知,抑或是主体与客体之间的关系?哲学史上围绕美的讨论可谓众说纷纭。古希腊哲学家一般认为美是绝对和永恒的存在,犹如柏拉图所宣扬的永恒的“理式”,这是站在了本体论的立场上;[1]中世纪

【参考文献】