论认知美学的倒退——与李志宏教授商榷

发布时间：2017-12-27 12:13

本文关键词：论认知美学的倒退——与李志宏教授商榷　出处：《河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：李志宏的认知美学打着"科学化美学"的旗号,实质上属于近代认识论美学的范畴。认识论美学存在有其必然性和历史价值,但是,如果固守认识论美学的唯一阵地,排斥其他的美学流派,拒斥"实践转向"和社会本体论美学,势必走向历史的倒退。认识论美学主要研究审美主体及其审美状态或者审美心境,却无法解决美的本质等根本问题,因此,认知美学在美的本质问题面前束手无策,只得采取"鸵鸟政策",拒不承认美的本质问题,斥之为"伪命题"。人类的一切认识,只能来源于社会实践,离开了社会实践来单独谈论审美认知,就只能是缘木求鱼;单独从认识论角度探讨美学问题,势必走向纯意识和纯主观的领域,重蹈西方近代认识论美学的覆辙,在主客二元对立的形而上学方法论中不能自拔,倒退到康德主义的主观唯心主义的老路上去。
[Abstract]:Li Zhihong's cognitive aesthetics, with the banner of "scientific aesthetics", is essentially a category of modern epistemological aesthetics. Epistemological aesthetics has its inevitability and historical value. However, if we stick to the only position of epistemology and exclude other schools of aesthetics, we will go back to the historical stage if we reject the "practice turn" and the social ontology aesthetics. Epistemological aesthetics mainly studies the aesthetic subject and the aesthetic or aesthetic mood, but can not solve the fundamental problem, so the essence of beauty, aesthetic cognition in front of the nature of beauty at a loss what to do, had to take "ostrich policy", refused to recognize the nature of beauty, denounced as "pseudo proposition". All human knowledge, can only come from social practice, social practice alone left to talk about the aesthetic cognition, it can only be futile; separate from the epistemology angle of aesthetics, it is bound to pure consciousness and pure subjective realm, repeating the western modern epistemology aesthetics in the metaphysical method of subjective mistakes, inextricably bogged down in the two opposite theory in the back to Kant's subjective idealism on the road.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学文学院;华东政法大学人文学院;
【分类号】：B83
【正文快照】： 李志宏、刘洋的《认识论和“主客二分”何错之有?——兼论实践存在论美学的倒退》[1]坚持认识论美学和“主客二分”的思维方法,反把实践存在论美学指责为“倒退”,认为李志宏的认知美学才是“科学化美学”。这些论调之中充满着混乱和曲解,应该加以辨析和驳斥,以促进中国当代

【参考文献】