论姚斯的接受美学理论

发布时间：2018-04-18 00:21

本文选题：文学的历史性 + 期待视野　；参考：《江苏社会科学》2012年03期

【摘要】：姚斯的"接受美学",主要渊源于伽达默尔的理论,部分也受到包括结构主义在内的形式主义学派的影响。接受美学有三个重要的概念:文学的历史性,期待视野,文学演变。"文学的历史性"概念最具根本性,它是伽达默尔理解的历史性概念在文学史范围中的运用。"期待视野"是接受美学的中心概念,它有三个层次:期待系统、视野的变化、视野的重构。"期待系统"指的是读者所具有的对于文学体裁、形式、主题及语言的理解之综合。"文学演变"概念的涵义是:从单部作品进向文学系列,后继的作品解决前面的作品留下的形式的和道德的问题,并提出新问题。总的来说,姚斯理论的创造性并不明显。姚斯在理论及其论述上,也还存在着许多显见的缺陷:缺少一种社会性的、整体性的视野,未能说明美学接受的内在机制,忽视了审美的多元性及多线发展等。
[Abstract]:Jauss's aesthetic of reception, the main origin from Gadamer's theory part is also influenced by formalist including structuralism, aesthetics of reception. There are three important concepts: the history of literature, the horizon of expectations, the evolution of literature. The "historic" literary concept of the most fundamental, it is the use of Gadamer's understanding of historical concept in literary history. "Horizon of expectations" is to accept the central concept of aesthetics, it has three levels: looking forward to the system, the change of visual field, vision reconstruction. "Hope system" refers to the reader with some of the literary genre, form, theme and language comprehension the combination of "literary evolution". The concept is: from single to literary works in the series, leaving the subsequent works addressed in front of the works and moral problems, and put forward the new problem. In general, the creative theory, Yao is not obvious. Jauss and its discussion in theory, there are many obvious defects: lack of a social nature, the overall view, failed to explain the internal mechanism of aesthetic acceptance, ignore aesthetic diversity and multi line development.

【作者单位】：苏州大学文学院;
【分类号】：B83-0

【共引文献】