百年文论史案与“美学大讨论”——上海交通大学博士生导师夏中义先生访谈

发布时间：2018-04-22 09:19

本文选题：百年文论史案 + 美学大讨论　；参考：《社会科学家》2014年07期

【摘要】：把"美学大讨论"作为百年学术史案来回眸时,不能太拘泥于对"美的本质"的讨论究竟分几派,关键在于,几乎每个人都希望用自己对美的解释(或许高尔泰不在其列),来显示自己是正宗的"马克思主义"立场,实为"日丹诺夫主义"的理论立场。"美学大讨论"最值得思想史确认的一个史实,是中央权威通过美学论争让"日丹诺夫理论模式"成为在中国学术思想领域大普及的一个平台,它和"大批判"、"大整风"等思想改造运动在性质上是一样的,但形态不一样。因为通过美学论争,也使得受众对"美"与"美感"等美学概念开始有了最基本但又很模糊的了解。让"日丹诺夫理论模式"来规训你楔入学术时的价值视角、思维规程与论述语式,这是思想改造"大环境"中意识形态的要求,与此同时,通过论争又使得美学问题得到持续不断地研讨、深化与传播,这又是"双百"方针"小气候"下学术性的体现。
[Abstract]:When looking back on the "grand discussion of aesthetics" as a century-old academic case, we should not be too rigid in discussing the essence of beauty. The key lies in the fact that the discussion on the essence of beauty is divided into several schools. Almost everyone wants to use their own interpretation of beauty (perhaps Gaultai is not here to show that he is an authentic "Marxist" position, in fact, a theoretical position of "Zidanov Doctrine". " Aesthetic discussion "the most worthy historical fact of the history of thought is that the central authority, through the aesthetic debate, has made" Ridanov's theoretical model "a platform for great popularity in the field of academic thought in China." It is the same nature as the Great criticism and the Great rectification Movement, but the form is different. Because of the aesthetic controversy, the audience began to have the most basic but vague understanding of aesthetic concepts such as "beauty" and "aesthetic feeling". Let the "Zidanov Theory Model" to discipline the value perspective, thought rules, and argumentation when you wedge into the academic world, which is the ideological requirement for the ideological transformation of the "Great Environment," at the same time, Through the controversy, aesthetic problems have been continuously discussed, deepened and disseminated, which is the embodiment of academic nature under the "microclimate" of the "double hundred" policy.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学人文学院文学研究所;中国文艺理论学会;
【分类号】：B83-09

【相似文献】