国内美学、文艺学主体间性研究述评

发布时间：2018-06-21 09:12

本文选题：主体间性研究 + 主体性理论　；参考：《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年01期

【摘要】：国内美学、文艺学主体间性研究兴起于20世纪90年代末,是对80年代形成的主体性理论的修正。近年来,主体间性研究主要从三个方面展开:一是建构知识论形态的美学、文艺学主体间性理论体系;二是着眼"主体间性"中的"间性"研究;三是主体间性理论的审美反思和哲学批判。当前的主体间性研究成果丰硕,但也存在着间性研究替代主体间性研究、主体间性理论建构立场的多元选择以及主体间性能否取代主体性理论等诸多问题,这些问题的解决将直接影响主体间性研究未来的发展。从未来的发展而言,主体间性研究应立足本体论的立场,积极深化理论体系的建构,切实推动我国文论的现代转型。主体间性理论虽然完成了修正主体性理论局限、促进现代美学及文艺学转型的任务,却不可能也不必要重复80年代主体性理论一元统治的历史。百家争鸣恰是学术自由发展的前提,也是学术繁荣的表现。
[Abstract]:Domestic aesthetics, the study of intersubjectivity in literature and art began in the late 1990s, which is a revision of the subjectivity theory formed in the 1980s. In recent years, the research on intersubjectivity has been carried out from three aspects: one is to construct the aesthetics of the form of knowledge theory, the other is to focus on the study of "intersubjectivity" in the theory of intersubjectivity. Third, aesthetic reflection and philosophical criticism of intersubjectivity theory. The current research on intersubjectivity is fruitful, but there are still many problems, such as the intersubjectivity research, the multi-choice of the position of intersubjectivity theory construction, and whether intersubjectivity can replace the subjectivity theory, and so on. The solution of these problems will directly affect the future development of intersubjectivity research. As far as the future development is concerned, the study of intersubjectivity should be based on the ontological standpoint, actively deepen the construction of the theoretical system, and promote the modern transformation of literary theory in China. Although the theory of intersubjectivity has completed the task of modifying the limitations of subjectivity theory and promoting the transformation of modern aesthetics and literature and art, it is impossible and unnecessary to repeat the history of monolithic domination of subjectivity theory in the 1980s. The contending of a hundred schools of thought is the premise of the development of academic freedom and the expression of academic prosperity.
【作者单位】：厦门大学中文系;
【分类号】：B83;I01

【参考文献】