中西审美文化发生异途之假说

发布时间：2018-08-13 16:18

【摘要】：正近几年来,中西美学的比较研究得到了长足的发展,不少学者将精力投注在中国与西方这两条源远流长而又各具特色的美学思潮之中,并发现了许多等值而又异趣的内容,例如,中国人在审美和艺术活动中具有品味性强、直观性差,写意性强、写实性差,伦理性强、宗教性差等特征,而西方人的审美和艺术传统则与之刚好相反。这些等值而又异趣的内容显然是在中国和西方民族长期的社会生活和历史发展中逐渐形成和积累起来的,然而从发生学的意义上讲,这种现象形态的差异是否有着更为悠久的文化基因呢?也就是说,作为特殊的社会意识形态,中国与西方民族的审美和艺术活动是否在其产生之日起就有着不同的文化途径,而这种不同的文化途径又潜伏下其以后差异的历史根据呢?由于年代的久远,材料的匮乏,我们一时很难对如此复杂的问题做出一个简单而又明晰的结论。姑且做以下三点假说。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the comparative study of Chinese and Western aesthetics has made great progress. Many scholars have devoted their energies to the two ancient and distinctive aesthetic trends of thought, China and the West, and have found many equivalent and interesting contents. For example, Chinese people have the characteristics of strong taste, bad intuition, strong freehand brushwork, poor realism, strong ethics and bad religion in aesthetic and artistic activities, while the western aesthetic and artistic traditions are just the opposite. It is obvious that these equivalent and interesting contents were gradually formed and accumulated in the long-term social life and historical development of the Chinese and Western nations. However, in the sense of genomics, Is there a longer cultural gene in the form of this phenomenon? That is to say, as a special social ideology, whether the aesthetic and artistic activities of Chinese and Western nations have different cultural channels since their birth. But this kind of different cultural way also lurks its later difference historical basis? Because of the age and the shortage of materials, it is difficult for us to draw a simple and clear conclusion on such a complicated problem. Let's make the following three hypotheses.

【相似文献】