杨春时“主体间性超越”美学理论研究
发布时间：2019-04-21 20:02
【摘要】：杨春时先生是中国当代颇具影响力的一位美学家。在与李泽厚为代表的实践美学的论争中,杨春时先生不断推进自己的美学思考,并最终建构起了由他自己所命名的“主体间性超越”美学理论,为当代中国美学基础理论的研究作出了积极贡献。杨春时先生最初是以“超越实践美学”、“走向后实践美学”等学术主张在美学界崭露头角的。在后实践美学家族中,他独树一帜地倡导超越美学,追寻生存的自由。此后,他发现实践美学过于强调主体性,这使得自由和美难以显现,于是他又自觉建构其审美主体间性理论。随着研究的进一步展开,杨春时发现超越美学还是建立在生存论而非存在论基础之上,而主体间性缺乏存在论的证明也无法最终实现对实践美学的超越,杨春时由此重视存在论和现象学的同一。在他看来,现代哲学的两大系统即存在论和现象学需要打通,如此才可以实现审美的超越性和主体间性,同时才可能建构名副其实的后实践美学,并最终实现美学作为“第一哲学”的夙愿。不妨说,美学作为“第一哲学”也是“第一哲学”自身的夙愿,因为存在、现象只有在美学中才是可能的。具体而言,杨春时为审美奠定了存在论的基础,认为存在作为生存的依据,具有同一性和本真性,是我与世界的共在,并由此推导出审美的超越性和主体间性。审美的超越性克服了现实生存的异化,由此到达自由的境界,并恢复存在的本真性;审美的主体间性则可以恢复存在的同一性。超越、主体间性的审美之境如何可能呢?杨春时认为除了要把世界存在论化,还需要将存在论与现象学关联起来。依其之见,存在论只有在现象学视域中才有可能,因为现象学让世界世界化的同时,也就让现象成为存在的显现,而现象成为存在的显现之时,现象也就不是存在者的呈现。生存的超越也因此有了存在论的依据,主体间性也就从认识论走向了存在论。就此而言,“主体间性的超越”美学只有进入现象学视域才能够获得,杨春时因此认为美学乃现象学与存在论的同一。杨春时先生的“主体间性超越”美学理论推动了实践论美学的自我发展,诸如新实践美学、实践存在论美学的建构无疑都直接或间接地受到了他的影响,因此不可否认其美学的基础理论价值和学术史意义。同时,由于“主体间性超越”美学理论沟通了现象学与存在论,可谓在新的存在论基础上构建了现代形而上学,这为克服现代社会可能出现的意义虚无等弊病提供了救赎可能。
[Abstract]:Mr. Yang Chunshi is an influential aesthetician in contemporary China. In the controversy with Li Zehou's practical aesthetics, Mr. Yang Chunshi constantly promoted his aesthetic thinking, and finally constructed his own aesthetic theory of "inter-subjectivity transcendence", which he named as "inter-subjectivity transcendence". It has made a positive contribution to the study of the basic theory of contemporary Chinese aesthetics. At first, Yang Chunshi came to the fore in the field of aesthetics with such academic ideas as "transcending practical aesthetics" and "moving towards post-practical aesthetics". In the family of post-practical aesthetics, he advocated transcending aesthetics and pursuing the freedom of existence. After that, he found that practical aesthetics emphasized too much subjectivity, which made freedom and beauty difficult to manifest, so he consciously constructed his theory of inter-subjectivity. With the further development of the research, Yang Chunshi found that transcendental aesthetics was still based on existentialism rather than existentialism, and the lack of existential proof of intersubjectivity could not finally achieve the transcendence of practical aesthetics. Yang Chunshi attached great importance to the identity of existentialism and phenomenology. In his view, the two major systems of modern philosophy, namely, existentialism and phenomenology, need to be connected in order to realize the transcendence and intersubjectivity of aesthetics, and at the same time to construct the real post-practical aesthetics. And finally realize aesthetics as the "first philosophy" long-cherished wish. It can be said that aesthetics, as the first philosophy, is also the long-cherished wish of the first philosophy, because the phenomenon is only possible in aesthetics. Specifically, Yang Chunshi laid the foundation of existential theory for aesthetics, holding that being, as the basis of existence, has identity and truth, is the co-existence of me and the world, and deduces the transcendence and intersubjectivity of aesthetics. The transcendence of aesthetics overcomes the alienation of realistic existence, thus reaches the realm of freedom and restores the authenticity of existence, while the inter-subjectivity of aesthetics can restore the identity of existence. How is it possible to transcend, inter-subjective aesthetic environment? Yang Chunshi thought that in addition to the theory of world existence, it was necessary to associate existentialism with phenomenology. In its opinion, existentialism is possible only from the perspective of phenomenology, because phenomenology makes the phenomenon become the manifestation of existence, while the phenomenon becomes the manifestation of existence, and when the phenomenon becomes the manifestation of existence, the phenomenon is not the representation of the being. Therefore, the transcendence of existence has the basis of existentialism, and intersubjectivity has changed from epistemology to existentialism. In this regard, "inter-subjectivity transcendence" aesthetics can only be obtained from the perspective of phenomenology. Yang Chunshi therefore thinks that aesthetics is the same as phenomenology and existentialism. Yang Chunshi's aesthetic theory of "inter-subjectivity transcendence" promoted the self-development of practical aesthetics, such as the new practical aesthetics, and the construction of practical existential aesthetics was undoubtedly influenced by him directly or indirectly. Therefore, there is no denying its basic theoretical value of aesthetics and the significance of academic history. At the same time, because the aesthetic theory of "inter-subjectivity transcendence" has communicated phenomenology and existentialism, it can be said that modern metaphysics has been constructed on the basis of new existentialism, which provides the possibility of redemption for overcoming the evils of meaning nihilism that may appear in modern society.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B83-092
本文编号：2462510
[Abstract]:Mr. Yang Chunshi is an influential aesthetician in contemporary China. In the controversy with Li Zehou's practical aesthetics, Mr. Yang Chunshi constantly promoted his aesthetic thinking, and finally constructed his own aesthetic theory of "inter-subjectivity transcendence", which he named as "inter-subjectivity transcendence". It has made a positive contribution to the study of the basic theory of contemporary Chinese aesthetics. At first, Yang Chunshi came to the fore in the field of aesthetics with such academic ideas as "transcending practical aesthetics" and "moving towards post-practical aesthetics". In the family of post-practical aesthetics, he advocated transcending aesthetics and pursuing the freedom of existence. After that, he found that practical aesthetics emphasized too much subjectivity, which made freedom and beauty difficult to manifest, so he consciously constructed his theory of inter-subjectivity. With the further development of the research, Yang Chunshi found that transcendental aesthetics was still based on existentialism rather than existentialism, and the lack of existential proof of intersubjectivity could not finally achieve the transcendence of practical aesthetics. Yang Chunshi attached great importance to the identity of existentialism and phenomenology. In his view, the two major systems of modern philosophy, namely, existentialism and phenomenology, need to be connected in order to realize the transcendence and intersubjectivity of aesthetics, and at the same time to construct the real post-practical aesthetics. And finally realize aesthetics as the "first philosophy" long-cherished wish. It can be said that aesthetics, as the first philosophy, is also the long-cherished wish of the first philosophy, because the phenomenon is only possible in aesthetics. Specifically, Yang Chunshi laid the foundation of existential theory for aesthetics, holding that being, as the basis of existence, has identity and truth, is the co-existence of me and the world, and deduces the transcendence and intersubjectivity of aesthetics. The transcendence of aesthetics overcomes the alienation of realistic existence, thus reaches the realm of freedom and restores the authenticity of existence, while the inter-subjectivity of aesthetics can restore the identity of existence. How is it possible to transcend, inter-subjective aesthetic environment? Yang Chunshi thought that in addition to the theory of world existence, it was necessary to associate existentialism with phenomenology. In its opinion, existentialism is possible only from the perspective of phenomenology, because phenomenology makes the phenomenon become the manifestation of existence, while the phenomenon becomes the manifestation of existence, and when the phenomenon becomes the manifestation of existence, the phenomenon is not the representation of the being. Therefore, the transcendence of existence has the basis of existentialism, and intersubjectivity has changed from epistemology to existentialism. In this regard, "inter-subjectivity transcendence" aesthetics can only be obtained from the perspective of phenomenology. Yang Chunshi therefore thinks that aesthetics is the same as phenomenology and existentialism. Yang Chunshi's aesthetic theory of "inter-subjectivity transcendence" promoted the self-development of practical aesthetics, such as the new practical aesthetics, and the construction of practical existential aesthetics was undoubtedly influenced by him directly or indirectly. Therefore, there is no denying its basic theoretical value of aesthetics and the significance of academic history. At the same time, because the aesthetic theory of "inter-subjectivity transcendence" has communicated phenomenology and existentialism, it can be said that modern metaphysics has been constructed on the basis of new existentialism, which provides the possibility of redemption for overcoming the evils of meaning nihilism that may appear in modern society.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B83-092
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨春时;;乐道·兴情·神韵——中华美学的审美本质论[J];学术月刊;2015年10期
2 杨春时;;论审美现象学[J];厦大中文学报;2014年01期
3 高建平;;美学的超越与回归[J];上海大学学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
4 杨春时;;关于后实践美学的解说[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年01期
5 吴时红;;论“后实践美学”——以“超越美学”与“生命美学”为对象[J];美育学刊;2013年04期
6 杜正华;刘超;;论超越美学的自由观[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2013年02期
7 杨春时;;存在与自由[J];吉首大学学报(社会科学版);2013年01期
8 杨春时;;中国古典美学本体论[J];广东社会科学;2012年05期
9 王伟;;主体间性交往论的想象方式——基于杨春时的现代性美学论述[J];兰州学刊;2012年08期
10 杨春时;;我的美学之路[J];文艺评论;2012年07期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张弓;历史视野中的实践美学[D];复旦大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 曹秋月;审美超越浅论[D];山东大学;2008年
2 汪军;多元语境中的美学理论建构[D];北京语言大学;2008年
3 贺丽;实践美学论争的历史考察及其哲学反思[D];黑龙江大学;2007年
4 张文通;海德格尔的主体间性美学思想[D];厦门大学;2006年
5 肖明华;海德格尔的存在论美学思想研究[D];江西师范大学;2005年
6 刘三秀;论审美超越性[D];厦门大学;2001年
，本文编号：2462510
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/meixuelunwen/2462510.html
