当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 美学论文 >

文艺学方法的“智慧学”——陈鸣树《文艺学方法概论》评介

发布时间:2019-05-14 02:43
【摘要】:正 近几年自“方法论热”兴起以来,曾先后出过一些有关文艺学方法论的专著,这是十分可喜的。但有的专著往往只有对西方各种方法的介绍,它虽然林林总总,洋洋洒洒,但不免令人眼花缭乱,不知所从。这一客观效果,似乎有悖于文艺学方法研究的初衷。然而,陈鸣树教授的新著《文艺学方法概论》(上海文艺出版社1991年出版,以下简称《概论》)则不同,它虽然面世较晚,却表现出一种思维和体系的优异性、超越性,其中闪现着一种智慧的思想火花。在文艺学研究中,方法有三个层次:“一般方法是最高层的方法,即思维方法或称哲学方法、特殊方法即运用到文学这个领域的各种方法、具体(个别)方法即适合于各别具
[Abstract]:In recent years, since the rise of "methodology fever", some monographs on the methodology of literature and art have been published one after another, which is very gratifying. However, some monographs often only introduce various methods in the West. Although they are all over the world, they are dazzling and do not know what to follow. This objective effect seems to be contrary to the original intention of the study of literary and art methods. However, Professor Chen Mingshu's new book introduction to Literary and Art methods (published by Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House in 1991, hereinafter referred to as "introduction") is different. Although it came out relatively late, it shows the superiority and transcendence of a kind of thinking and system. There is a spark of wisdom in it. In the study of literature and art, there are three levels of methods: "the general method is the highest method, that is, the thinking method or philosophical method, the special method is the various methods applied to the field of literature, and the specific (individual) method is suitable for each other."

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 单国华;;中西方思维的差异与美学理论创新[J];中国文学研究;2011年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 高波;论美学研究的现象学视角[D];山东大学;2005年



本文编号:2476373

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/meixuelunwen/2476373.html

上一篇:论审美理想  
下一篇:美学理论重构之我见

Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ad822***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com