“音声”:认知与释义——对音乐民族志研究中认知人类学及阐释学方法的读解

发布时间：2018-02-27 10:22

本文关键词： 认知音乐人类学阐释学音乐民族志音声文本语境文本语义学路径语用学路径　出处：《音乐艺术(上海音乐学院学报)》2009年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：音乐人类学在认知人类学与阐释学影响下,已经形成了带有"认知音乐人类学"(布莱金语)特点的分析思维和方法论,由此促进了音乐民族志研究方法上的明显的改变和发展。通过对其理论前提——音乐民族志文本研究中主体性涉入因素的反复循环过程以及音声文本、文化模式同广义文本性(语境文本)之间的关系等理论问题的梳理,并借用文化符号学的相关分析方法,可以看出如今在音乐民族志研究领域存在着两种带有认知音乐人类学—阐释(符号)学学术倾向的分析视角(或路径),即:始自语用学(语境研究),止乎于语义学的视角和始自语义学,以形态学为终端的视角(或路径)。中国学者的研究现况则在一定程度上整合了上述两种学术路径及分析思维。
[Abstract]:Under the influence of cognitive anthropology and hermeneutics, musical anthropology has formed analytical thinking and methodology with the characteristics of "cognitive musical anthropology". This has promoted the obvious change and development in the research method of music ethnography, through the repeated circulation process of the subjectivity involved factors in the study of music ethnography text and the sound text. The relationship between cultural model and generalized textuality (contextual text) and other theoretical issues are combed, and the relevant analysis methods of cultural semiotics are used. It can be seen that in the field of ethnography, there are two kinds of analytical perspectives (or paths) with the academic tendency of cognitive musical anthropology-hermeneutics (symbol), that is, the beginning of pragmatics (context study), which ends in semantics. The perspective of learning and the beginning of semantics, The present research situation of Chinese scholars integrates the above two academic paths and analytical thinking to a certain extent.
【作者单位】：中央音乐学院;《中央音乐学院学报》;上海高校音乐人类学E研究院;
【基金】：上海高校音乐人类学E-研究院建设计划项目:e05011
【分类号】：J607

【参考文献】