再议《雁塔圣教序》及《序记》的异常线问题

发布时间：2018-01-23 21:44

本文关键词： 《雁塔圣教序》异常线轮廓线补刻铲底　出处：《中国书法》2017年18期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：褚遂良所书写《雁塔圣教序》和《雁塔圣教序记》一直以来备受历代书家的关注,日本学者荒金大琳通过对原碑拍照放大,发现两碑共计九百七十八字笔画出现异常。荒金氏认为这是褚遂良在原稿上修正以后经万文韶忠实摹刻的结果,这一研究观点引起国内外学者的关注。本文通过与以两碑为母本翻刻但晚于两碑十年的《同州圣教序》相对照,结合褚遂良所书的《孟法师碑》《伊阙佛龛碑》拓本,从书法创作的基本规律、大雁塔损毁重建的历史、刻碑手法、捶拓与补刻等方面证实目前的《雁塔圣教序》线条的形成原因是多方面的。
[Abstract]:Chu Suiliang's writings of the Goose Pagoda Scripture and the Goose Pagoda Scripture have been paid much attention by scholars of all dynasties. The Japanese scholar Yoshindarin magnified the original monument by taking pictures. A total of 978 characters of the two tablets were found to be abnormal, which was attributed to Chu Suiliang's revision of the original manuscript by Wan Wenshao's faithful copying. This point of view has attracted the attention of scholars both at home and abroad. This paper contrasts with "the Holy Preface of the same State", which is carved with two tablets as the female but later than ten years after the two tablets. According to the basic rules of calligraphy creation, the history of the destruction and reconstruction of the Big Wild Goose Pagoda, and the engraving technique of the monument, combined with the "Meng Master tablet" and "Ique Buddha niche tablet" written by Chu Suiliang, this paper discusses the basic rules of calligraphy creation. The formation of the lines of the Goose Pagoda Scripture is confirmed by such aspects as thumping and supplementary engraving, and there are many reasons for the formation of the lines.
【作者单位】：山东财经大学艺术学院;
【分类号】：J292.1
【正文快照】： 《大唐三藏圣教序》(下简称《圣教序》)与《大唐皇帝述三藏圣教序记》(下简称《序记》),二者皆为楷书。两石立于陕西西安市南郊慈恩寺大雁塔底东、西龛中。东龛内为唐太宗所撰之《序》碑,由右向左书排布,题额隶书,二十一行,行四十二字,共八百二十一字,文尾署『永徽四年岁次癸

【相似文献】