古题新释——古代绘画款识书法小议

发布时间：2018-04-26 14:20

本文选题：此其 + 古代绘画　；参考：《中国书法》2012年05期

【摘要】：正一"书画同源"以及后起之"书画同法"说,已是一个古老之命题。世论及之者夥,已为陈案,或成定论,少见新说。偶有异议,多为新派者流,以纯视觉形式而论艺术,不能探本于中华文明,故不足与论。证之古代画史,书与画之交互影响殊密,尤以书法作用于画法为巨。其徵有二:书画所用之工具材料同,所谓同"体",此其显者。书画所采之挥运方法近,原则通,所谓同"用",此其隐者。有此二徵,则不难认同其理法之相通似,故"同源"可上追古史再求新证据,而"同法"则庶几无错。
[Abstract]:It is an ancient proposition that Zhengyi "the same origin of calligraphy and painting" and "the same method of painting and calligraphy". The world discussed the party, has been Chen case, or come to a conclusion, rare new theory. Occasionally dissent, mostly for the new flow, in the form of pure visual art, can not be explored in the Chinese civilization, so insufficient and theory. In the history of ancient painting, the interaction between calligraphy and painting is very close, especially in calligraphy. There are two signs: the same materials used in painting and calligraphy, so-called "body", this is obvious. Calligraphy and painting of the near, principle, so-called "use", this hermit. With these two signs, it is not difficult to identify the similarities between the two theories, so "homology" can catch up with the ancient history and look for new evidence, while "the same law" is almost correct.
【作者单位】：中国国家画院;
【分类号】：J292.1

【相似文献】