《绛帖》研究
[Abstract]:"crimson" was carved by Pan Shidan in Jiangzhou, Shanxi Province in Northern Song Dynasty. Although "crimson" was carved in concrete form when there was no clear historical record, it was also an early private engraving. However, since Pan died, his two sons separated, "crimson" has been carved several times, versions have emerged in endlessly, successively appeared DongkuBen, new Jiang Ben, Wu Gang Ben, "bright" character incomplete and so on. In the middle and late Southern Song Dynasty, it was not easy to see the ancestor of "crimson". Although there are many works on crimson, it is difficult for scholars at that time to explain the relationship between the spread and evolution of each edition. In Yuan and Ming dynasties, crimson became less concerned, but a small number of calligraphers collected and studied it. In the Qing Dynasty, tablet studies rose, however, the study of placards continued to have a strong vitality, many officials and dignitaries are faithful inheritors of the post, and "crimson posts" as a very important group of posts in the engraved posts, still receive high attention. Since the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, scholars or collectors have been studying and collecting Song Tuo's crimson posts, and they pay as much attention to them as Chunhua Pavilion posts and Daguan posts. This paper will mainly discuss the spread and evolution of crimson and the relationship between the existing versions. The first chapter makes a detailed combing and discussion on the publication and edition of "crimson posts" in the Song Dynasty, and mainly studies and puts forward new views on the issue of the reprint of East Kuben. The second chapter makes a brief exposition on the spread of "crimson" in Yuan and Ming dynasties, which involves the attention of some booksellers and collectors, and it is also a supplement to the history of accepting "crimson posts" in this stage. The third chapter discusses the collection and research of crimson in Qing Dynasty, and focuses on the related issues of the pseudo-book "crimson".
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:J292.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李雪峰;;略述宋代刻帖的种类[J];科教导刊(中旬刊);2010年10期
2 方波;;文化资本与文化商品:明代江南私家刻帖的一个面向[J];文艺研究;2012年12期
3 吕金光;成海明;;晚明刻帖失真与“尊碑”意识萌芽的出现[J];艺术百家;2013年03期
4 刘镇;;论长洲文氏家族与明代江南刻帖之繁荣[J];书法;2013年09期
5 蔡清德;;地域性刻帖之发端——《金陵名贤帖》的编刻流传、特征与史学意义[J];艺术百家;2012年05期
6 刘镇;;论长洲文氏家族与明代江南刻帖之繁荣[J];书法赏评;2013年02期
7 孟庆星;;邢侗与晚明清初山左集古刻帖考论[J];东方艺术;2011年08期
8 ;匡时首次推出善本碑帖专场[J];文物鉴定与鉴赏;2012年06期
9 张鹏宇;秦振吉;;榆次常家之书院藏帖简论[J];海南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2012年09期
10 ;《张忠烈公墨迹刻帖考》补正[J];文物;1986年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前7条
1 史春生;“碑”与“帖”的区别[N];中国商报;2004年
2 万君超;说法帖[N];中国文化报;2010年
3 录音整理 吴川淮 张平;书法的过去、现在与未来[N];中国文化报;2013年
4 陈尔俊;历代汇帖述略[N];中国文物报;2004年
5 曹萌;端严肃穆 灵秀典雅[N];中国文物报;2011年
6 肖鑫(北京);浅谈《阁帖》的借鉴价值[N];中国艺术报;2003年
7 白锐;“书法热”之我见[N];文艺报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 宗成振;刻帖著述研究[D];首都师范大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 肖成彦;《绛帖》研究[D];西南大学;2015年
2 崔永升;永tF刻帖与题跋研究[D];西南大学;2011年
3 高秀清;宋代“书迹题跋”研究[D];首都师范大学;2004年
4 张百军;宋代的书迹著录研究[D];首都师范大学;2006年
5 张爱梅;《太原段帖》研究[D];山西师范大学;2013年
6 张驰;孔继涑与《玉虹楼法帖》[D];首都师范大学;2014年
7 林伊;清代嘉道时期的欧书兴盛研究[D];杭州师范大学;2013年
,本文编号:2177268
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/shufayishu/2177268.html