近代书法批评略谈
发布时间：2018-11-01 14:00
【摘要】：批评不能混淆于批判、指责、谩骂,同样,书法批评应该是基于美学意义之上,运用艺术理论的方法,对书家、作品的优劣得失做出理性的评判,揭示书法的艺术准则、创作规律,提炼汉字书写审美形态和审美范畴等。近代以来,本土固有的文化的浸染,西式理念的涌入,各种艺术思潮涌动,也掀起了书法批评热潮的新开端。除了延续传统体系,还有一种模式就是接纳西方的哲学、美学、艺术学理论,重新审视书法,因而形成了全新的书法批评格局。筚路蓝缕,以启山林。几十年来,在梳理、讨论、明晰书法的性质、地位、规律、准则、风格、价值、审美等诸多命题之后,当代书法批评开始积淀了一批学术成果。只是,由于先天的不足以及后天独特、复杂的批评环境,当下书法批评依然"行路难,多歧路",依然任重道远。
[Abstract]:Criticism should not be confused with criticism, criticism and abuse. Similarly, calligraphy criticism should be based on the aesthetic meaning, using the method of art theory to make rational judgments on the merits and demerits of calligraphers and works, and to reveal the artistic norms of calligraphy. The law of creation, the refinement of Chinese writing aesthetic form and aesthetic category, and so on. Since modern times, native culture, western ideas and various trends of thought have started a new craze of calligraphy criticism. In addition to the continuation of the traditional system, there is a pattern of accepting western philosophy, aesthetics and art theory, and reexamining calligraphy, thus forming a new pattern of calligraphy criticism. The hard way to open the mountain forest. In the past decades, after combing, discussing and clarifying the nature, status, law, criterion, style, value and aesthetic of calligraphy, the contemporary calligraphy criticism began to accumulate a number of academic achievements. However, due to innate shortcomings and unique and complex criticism environment, calligraphy criticism is still difficult to go, many different paths, and still has a long way to go.
【作者单位】： 《中国书法》杂志社;
【分类号】：J292.1
本文编号：2304126
[Abstract]:Criticism should not be confused with criticism, criticism and abuse. Similarly, calligraphy criticism should be based on the aesthetic meaning, using the method of art theory to make rational judgments on the merits and demerits of calligraphers and works, and to reveal the artistic norms of calligraphy. The law of creation, the refinement of Chinese writing aesthetic form and aesthetic category, and so on. Since modern times, native culture, western ideas and various trends of thought have started a new craze of calligraphy criticism. In addition to the continuation of the traditional system, there is a pattern of accepting western philosophy, aesthetics and art theory, and reexamining calligraphy, thus forming a new pattern of calligraphy criticism. The hard way to open the mountain forest. In the past decades, after combing, discussing and clarifying the nature, status, law, criterion, style, value and aesthetic of calligraphy, the contemporary calligraphy criticism began to accumulate a number of academic achievements. However, due to innate shortcomings and unique and complex criticism environment, calligraphy criticism is still difficult to go, many different paths, and still has a long way to go.
【作者单位】： 《中国书法》杂志社;
【分类号】：J292.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 高焕春;《易》中审美范畴的辩证沟通[J];艺圃(吉林艺术学院学报);1988年02期
2 高廉平;书法审美范畴概略[J];重庆电大学刊;1995年02期
3 高廉平;书法审美范畴概略[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1995年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 白晓宁;明清绘画审美范畴—“势”的研究[D];四川师范大学;2016年
，本文编号：2304126
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/shufayishu/2304126.html
