中韩象征主义诗人李金发、黄锡禹之比较
发布时间:2018-01-23 11:23
本文关键词: 象征主义 李金发 黄锡禹 比较研究 出处:《延边大学》2006年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:通过对20世纪初中韩两国象征主义诗人李金发、黄锡禹的诗歌进行比较研究,从两个方面对这两位象征主义诗人进行了系统的论述:一、二十世纪初象征主义在中韩两国的传播;二、李金发、黄锡禹的诗歌文本比较研究。 第一部分主要从历史文化背景来考察中韩象征主义诗人李金发、黄锡禹的诗歌创作。在总体的历史文化背景下,看两个人对同一个西方文学思潮——象征主义的理解和接受。在中韩两国接受象征主义的过程中,表现出两个相同点:二十世纪初的象征主义文学思潮在中韩两国都带有一种不可避免的混合性,并且都深受被日本过滤后的象征主义的影响。 第二部分是论文的主体部分,从李金发和黄锡禹具体的象征主义诗歌出发,用平行研究的方法对诗歌文本的主题、意象、李金发和黄锡禹诗歌中所体现出的过渡性三个方面进行了比较研究:一、在主题比较中,以死亡主题和颓废主题为切入点,比较李金发和黄锡禹在诗歌创作中表现出的主题差异性:他们都意识到了死亡,并在诗歌中充分体现出他们对死亡的认识——李金发相对而言更坚决一些,而黄锡禹则选择了“隐遁”;在颓废主题中,,黄锡禹的表现要比李金发强烈,并伴随着浓厚的虚无主义倾向。二、比较二人的诗歌意象时,以自然景物意象和宗教意象为关注点进行了考察。面对自然时,李金发和黄锡禹明显选择了不同的情感取向;在运用宗教意象入诗的时候,表现出很大的不同——李诗有一种朦胧的宗教色彩,黄诗则流露出天人合一的思想。三、在语言和文学历程上,李金发、黄锡禹二人都表现出了处于社会转型期的语言特点以及文学进程中多种思想、流派相互作用相互影响的特点。 在世界文学史的发展过程中,古代的东方文明和西方世界是相对封闭的,直到近代社会这种情况才被打破。随着近代社会政治经济格局的变动,西方文学思潮的传入,对东方文学产生了不可磨灭的影响。这一论题也正是这种影响的一个个体性体现。而且通过以上的分析,可以看出同属于东方汉文化圈中的中韩两国在接受西方象征主义文学思潮的过程中,都表现出了一种带有丰富民族特性的共性;而李金发和黄锡禹在吸收内化象征主义的过程中所表现出的相似性和相异性,也正是论题的写作目的。
[Abstract]:Through a comparative study of the poems of Li Jinfa and Huang Xiyu, the symbolist poets of China and South Korea in the early 20th century, this paper systematically discusses the two symbolism poets from two aspects: 1. In 20th century, symbolism spread in China and South Korea; Second, the comparative study of Li Jinfa and Huang Xiyu's poetry texts. The first part mainly from the historical and cultural background to examine the Chinese and South Korean symbolism poet Li Jinfa, Huang Xiyu's poetry creation, in the overall historical and cultural background. Look at the two people's understanding and acceptance of the same western literary trend-symbolism. In the process of China and South Korea accepting symbolism. There are two similarities: in 20th century, the symbolism literary trend in China and South Korea has an inevitable mixture, and is deeply influenced by Japan's filtered symbolism. The second part is the main part of the paper, from Li Jinfa and Huang Xiyu specific symbolism poetry, with parallel research methods to the theme of poetry text, image. Li Jinfa and Huang Xiyu poetry reflected in the transitional three aspects of comparative research: first, in the theme comparison, the theme of death and decadence as the breakthrough point. Comparing the theme difference between Li Jinfa and Huang Xiyu in their poetry creation, they are all aware of death, and fully reflect their understanding of death in their poems. Huang Xiyu chose "hiding"; In the decadent theme, Huang Xiyu's performance is stronger than Li Jinfa, and accompanied by a strong nihilism. Focusing on the image of natural scenery and religious image, Li Jinfa and Huang Xiyu obviously chose different emotional orientations in the face of nature. In the use of religious images into poetry, there is a great difference-Li Shi has a dim religious color, Huang Shi revealed the thought of the unity of nature and man. Third, in the language and literature process, Li Jinfa. Huang Xiyu and Huang Xiyu both showed the language characteristics in the period of social transformation and the interaction of various ideas and schools in the process of literature. In the course of the development of world literature history, the ancient oriental civilization and the western world were relatively closed, until the modern society this kind of situation was broken, along with the modern society politics economy pattern change. The introduction of western literary thought has had an indelible influence on the oriental literature. This thesis is also an individual embodiment of this kind of influence, and through the above analysis. It can be seen that both China and South Korea, which belong to the oriental Han cultural circle, have displayed a common character with rich national characteristics in the process of accepting the western symbolism literary trend. Li Jinfa and Huang Xiyu showed similarities and differences in the process of absorbing symbolism.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:I0-03;I207.25;I312
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 鲍庆忠;简论李金发的早期诗歌与西方象征主义的关系[J];常州技术师范学院学报;2002年03期
2 曹艳华;论李金发诗歌的纯美艺术[J];丹东师专学报;2003年04期
3 林志平;艺术的超越与艺术的尴尬──艾青、李金发诗歌创作之比较[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1997年S1期
4 凡尼;从李金发到戴望舒──中国现代象征诗的流变轨迹[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1996年04期
5 汪登存;颓废:生命情调的选择——李金发象征主义诗歌审美主题浅探[J];淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
6 刘钦伟;李金发与象征主义[J];海南师范学院学报(人文社会科学版);2001年01期
7 李标晶;论象征诗派的西方渊源[J];嘉应大学学报;2001年04期
8 高翎;形象的哲学——比较波特莱尔与李金发的象征主义诗歌形象和人生态度[J];昆明师范高等专科学校学报;2003年01期
9 李韶;深文隐蔚 曲径寻幽——“怪异”“难懂”与李金发的诗艺特征[J];连云港教育学院学报;1997年02期
10 郭亚明;象征的意蕴——李金发诗歌中暗示、跳跃手法的运用[J];内蒙古教育学院学报;1997年01期
本文编号:1457424
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/1457424.html