《美狄亚》与《窦娥冤》情节结构比较

发布时间：2018-02-27 16:09

本文关键词： 美狄亚窦娥冤情节结构比较　出处：《重庆师范大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》同为戏剧体裁,又同为女性抗争的题材,两者有比较大的可比性。本文突破仅从内容上的比较研究,从情节结构这一艺术形式角度对两者作一比较。本文采用叶维廉的“模子寻根说”,强调把作品放在各自接近时空的理论中进行解读,再进行“互照互识”的比较研究。首先为《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》各自找到美学理论根据,即亚里斯多德的《诗学》和李渔的《闲情偶寄》,再用《诗学》中的戏剧理论阐述《美狄亚》,用《闲情偶寄》中的戏剧理论阐述《窦娥冤》,然后通过两者的“互照互识”,分析两者在情节结构上的相通和相异之处。全文分六个部分,第一部分为绪论,是对课题研究的意义、研究现状及研究方法的说明,着重介绍了《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》的研究现状。学界对《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》的关注角度多停留在内容层面,分析它们的文化内涵和社会意义,而忽视了这两个文本独特的艺术形式。在这部分,明确本文研究的创新之处,即撷取艺术形式中的情节结构角度对两者进行深入地比较研究。第二部分是情节结构简论,这是整篇文章的立论基点。本部分首先对亚里斯多德《诗学》中的“情节”和李渔《闲情偶寄》中的“结构”的进行分析,可以看到情节结构的内涵是有因果关系构建而成。然后明确本文选择情节结构这个艺术形式角度进行研究的依据是:情节结构在戏剧文学中占有重要地位,非常有必要对同为戏剧体裁的《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》从这方面进行比较研究。第三部为由因果关系构建《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》的情节结构。首先运用各自的理论依据分别对《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》的情节结构进行阐释,发现《美狄亚》的情节结构符合亚里斯多德的“情节必然性”原则,《窦娥冤》的情节结构符合李渔的“密针线”原则,而“情节必然性”原则和“密针线”原则实质都讲求情节结构内在承前启后,前后照应的因果关系,由此得出,《美狄亚》和《窦娥冤》的情节结构是由内在的因果关系构建而成。第四部分为两者因果关系构建情节结构的相通之处。主要分析在由因果关系构建情节结构这一前提下,两者又存在着立足整一观念、追求多层戏剧冲突、有偶然性因素参与这三个具体的相通之处。第五部分为两者因果关系构建的情节结构的不同之处。主要分析两者在高潮处理和结局安排上的不同。《美狄亚》的高潮被暗场处理,歌队被置于中心地位,美狄亚的杀子动作和心理活动皆有歌队表达出来;《窦娥冤》的高潮则笔墨特浓,由窦娥尽情地抒发自己的悲愤为主。在结局上,《美狄亚》是一悲到底的单一结局,而《窦娥冤》则是“善有善报,恶有恶报”的双重结局。结论部分指出在毫无照会,毫无影响的情况下,两者呈现出相通的一面,主要是由戏剧文学的本身的特征起了作用,而两者的相异之处则更多的是有各自所处的文化体系下不同的审美追求造成的。
[Abstract]:< < > Medea and Dou E > with the drama genre, with the subject of protest for women, both have great comparability. This breakthrough only from the comparative study on the content, make a comparison from the perspective of the art form of the two plot structure. This paper uses Ye Weilian's "mold roots said" putting the work in their respective emphasis in the theory of close space, then according to the mutual comparison of mutual knowledge ". Firstly," Medea "and" dou eyuan > find their aesthetic theory according to Aristotle's Poetics and Li Yu's < < > > and < xianqingouji, poetry study in drama theory > < Medea >, < > > send this Dou in drama theory with "leisure", and then through the two according to the mutual mutual recognition, both in the plot and structure analysis the similarities and differences.
The paper is divided into six parts, the first part is the introduction, the research significance, research status and research methods, mainly introduces the research status of "Medea" and "dou eyuan". Scholars of the "Medea" and "dou eyuan" attention stays at the content level and analyzes their cultural connotations and social significance, instead of the two text unique art form. In this part, clear the innovation of this research is to capture point of plot structure in the art form of the two in-depth comparative study.
The second part is on the plot structure, which is the basis of the whole article. The first part of the Poetics of Aristotle < > in the "plot" and Li Yu "xianqingouji >" structure "in the analysis of the connotation, can see the structure of the plot is a causal relationship is built. Then the clear choice the plot structure of the art form of the basis is: the plot structure occupies an important position in the literature, it is necessary to make comparative study with the drama genre" Medea "and" dou eyuan "from this aspect.
The third part is a causal relationship between the structure of the plot construction of "Medea" and "dou eyuan >. First illustrates the theoretical basis by their respective plot structure on" Medea "and" dou eyuan >, < > find Medea plot structure in line with Aristotle's "plot necessity" principle. Dou eyuan > plot structure in line with Li Yu's "dense needlework" principle and "plot necessity" and the principle of "dense needlework" the essence of principle stresses the intrinsic link of causality, plot structure, and reference the plot structure of Medea < > and < > Dou is determined by the inherent causal relationship built.
The fourth part is the connection between the two causation. We mainly analyze the premise of building a plot structure based on causality. They both have a sense of being based on the whole concept, and pursue three specific conflicts.
The fifth part difference plot structure for both the construction of causal relationship. Analysis the two major upsurge in the treatment and outcome of the different arrangements. Medea > climax was dark, songs by the team in the center position, Medea killed action and psychological activity are both expressed in chorus; "dou eyuan > climax pen by Dou MTM thick, free to express their anger. In the end, < > Medea is a sad end single, and" dou eyuan "is" the good, the double end sow the wind and reap the whirlwind. "
The conclusion points out that when there is no note or no influence, the two sides present an interlinked side, which is mainly influenced by the characteristics of drama literature, and the differences between them are mostly caused by different aesthetic pursuits in their respective cultural system.

【学位授予单位】：重庆师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：I106.3;I0-03

【参考文献】