当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文学理论论文 >

中西反阐释理论比较研究

发布时间:2018-03-04 08:14

  本文选题:反阐释 切入点:外部姿态 出处:《南京师范大学》2007年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】: 反阐释是西方后现代话语中的一个重要特征,可将其细划分为不可阐释、不必阐释、不该阐释三种情况。同时,从阐释学的层面来考察中国“不言”,又可发现,儒家之“不言”是有话不说,道玄之“不言”是有话难说,禅宗之“不言”则是无话可说,这也可以大体代表中国古代思想史上的三种反阐释观念。如此则比较可知,在外部姿态上,西方的反阐释既是阐释的发展,又是阐释的颠覆与反叛,有刻意性的成份贯穿其中。而中国的“不言”,则没有时间上的先后承续,与阐释并行不悖,并在后世多为演变成创作层面中的“无言”,具有不自觉性。在内在模式上,西方反阐释是作为本体论的语言面对被消解的、濒临危机的意义,而中国的“不言”则是作为工具论的语言面对无限的意义。这也导致了反阐释策略上的相应变化,西方是文本“体验”,,而中国则是本质妙悟。此外,中西反阐释还有着理论本身的共通统一和相似的价值意义,具备探讨的可能性和必要性。有理由相信,中西反阐释理论必然被通过有效的梳理与挖掘而树立其地位,它既是在传统的阐释之外,又归属于阐释学,只不过,它是以一种反阐释的方式来进行阐释。
[Abstract]:Against interpretation is an important feature of modern discourse in the west, can be divided into can not be interpreted, without explanation, not the interpretation of the three cases. At the same time, from the view of Hermeneutics China "without saying" can be found, the Confucian "don't speak" is there are no words to say the road, Xuan "no words" is hard to say, Zen "nothing to say", which also can generally represent three kinds of ideas against interpretation on the history of ancient China. So the comparison, in the external posture, the Western against interpretation is the interpretation of the development, also is the subversion and rebellion explain, have intentional ingredients through them. And China "without saying" no time has continued, and interpretation and in the future to run parallel, evolved into the creative aspect of "silent", has no consciousness. In the model, the Western against interpretation as ontology the theory of language In the face of words dispelled, endangered, and Chinese "words" as a tool of language with infinite significance. This also led to a corresponding change of interpretation strategy on the west is the "experience" of the text, which is the essence of China understanding. In addition, there are common western anti interpretation the unified theory itself and the similar value, so the discussion is possible and necessary. There is reason to believe that Western anti interpretation theory must be through combing and effective mining and establish its position, it is in addition to the traditional interpretation belong to the explanation, but it is to be explained by a kind of anti interpretation way.

【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2007
【分类号】:I0-03

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 H.波特·阿博特;王磊;;反阐释的认知升华——兼论加西亚·马尔克斯和贝克特文本外未知因素的文本体验[J];叙事(中国版);2011年00期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 韩模永;中西反阐释理论比较研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年



本文编号:1564851

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/1564851.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d9a74***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com