主体间性视域下的中国文学翻译策略探讨

发布时间：2018-03-25 09:56

本文选题：翻译策略　切入点：翻译主体性与主体间性理论　出处：《重庆大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文以当前翻译主体性、主体间性理论的研究成果构建出的理论框架,探讨作为翻译主体的译者及其主体性在翻译策略选择中的所体现的潜力与制约。作为一项跨文化交际活动,翻译涉及从源语向译入语在表现形式及其文化层面的转换,在对待如何处理转换过程中的语言文化差异的问题上,矛盾与分歧自然而生并直接体现于翻译策略的取向上:是归化翻译?还是异化翻译?国内相关研究论述颇丰,争论不断。本文批判地归纳总结了异化、归化之争以及相关研究背景中存在的问题:1)术语界定不明,范畴不清2)对西方相关译论中术语的误读3)对翻译本体研究与文化研究的界限缺乏清晰的认识。本文对这些问题进行了疏理与澄清。同时在当前全球化的背景下,翻译又被赋予新的历史使命:既要克服语言障碍、促进社会文化交流,又要维护语言文化的多样性。这一使命要求在翻译策略的矛盾中取得平衡,因此译者主体性与其他翻译主体间平等和谐的关系就显得尤为重要。通过对国内翻译主体性、主体间性的相关研究成果的提炼分析可以看出,主体间性理论中倡导的理想化翻译模式通常在实际操作中受到多种因素的制约而难以实现。基于上述研究,本文提出了一个理论假设,即在不同历史时代、地域文化背景下,由于各种因素的制约,如译入语文化介入,译者的文化态度、审美倾向及其他政治经济因素,主体间并不总能实现平等与和谐的关系,从而导致主体间性的失衡。而这种失衡会表现为译者翻译策略的不同取向与偏失,而造成译文某种程度上的不足。反之,在开放平等的理想文化生态环境下,译者主体更能发挥其潜力,在归化与异化间取得平衡。在此基础上,本文选择了主张“异化为主”的代表性人物孙致礼的相关翻译思想、论述、译例进行了个案分析,讨论了所谓“异化为主”的合理性。本文结论认为归化与异化的翻译策略在跨文化交际中各有其价值,辩证统一,永远共存,皆不可能代表翻译发展的总趋势。
[Abstract]:Based on the theoretical framework of the current theories of subjectivity and intersubjectivity in translation, this paper explores the potential and constraints of the translator as the subject of translation and his subjectivity in the choice of translation strategies. As a cross-cultural communication activity, translation involves the transformation from the source language to the target language in the form of expression and its cultural level, as well as how to deal with the linguistic and cultural differences in the process of transformation. Contradictions and differences arise naturally and are directly reflected in the orientation of translation strategies: domesticated translation? Or alienation translation? This paper critically summarizes the alienation, the dispute of domestication and the existing problems in the background of the related research: the definition of the term "1" is not clear. 2) the misreading of terms in western translation theories (3) the lack of a clear understanding of the boundaries between the study of translation ontology and the study of culture. At the same time, in the context of globalization, translation has been given a new historical mission: to overcome language barriers and promote social and cultural exchanges. In order to maintain the diversity of language and culture, this mission requires a balance in the contradiction of translation strategies, so the equal and harmonious relationship between the translator's subjectivity and other translation subjects is particularly important. From the analysis of the relevant research results of intersubjectivity, we can see that the idealized translation model advocated in the theory of intersubjectivity is usually restricted by many factors in practice and is difficult to realize. In this paper, a theoretical hypothesis is put forward, that is, under the background of different historical times and regional culture, due to the constraints of various factors, such as the cultural intervention of the target language, the cultural attitude of the translator, aesthetic tendency and other political and economic factors. The relationship between the subjects does not always achieve equality and harmony, which leads to the imbalance of inter-subjectivity, which is manifested by the different orientation and bias of the translator's translation strategies, which leads to the inadequacy of the translation to some extent. In an open and equal environment of ideal culture and ecology, the translator's subject can exert his potential and strike a balance between domestication and alienation. On this basis, this paper chooses Sun Zhi-li, a representative figure who advocates "alienation as the main body", to make a case study. This paper discusses the rationality of the so-called "alienation as the main factor", and concludes that the translation strategies of domestication and foreignization have their own value in cross-cultural communication, dialectical unity and forever coexistence, which cannot represent the general trend of translation development.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I046;H059

【相似文献】