文学研究的伦理转向与美国伦理批评的复兴
发布时间：2018-10-15 15:50
【摘要】：作为一种批评理论和批评方法,美国伦理批评经历了提出、兴起、繁荣、衰落、复兴、再发展的过程。20世纪八十年代是其发展过程中的分界线。在此之前,其繁荣表现为文学伦理学研究的蓬勃发展,随后因文学研究重心的转移和自身的局限而衰落;在此之后,随着文学和哲学研究中的伦理转向,伦理批评得到了复兴。此次的伦理转向不是回到19世纪的文学批评传统,而是对形式主义的反驳和对文学作为一种认知方式的重新定位。此次的复兴也不是道德批评的重申,而是伦理批评的进一步发展,并由此演变出了韦恩·布斯以共导为基础的伦理批评,玛莎·努斯鲍曼以多元和非公约性为基础的伦理评价,希利斯·米勒以文本与语言理论为基础的阅读伦理。
[Abstract]:As a criticism theory and criticism method, American ethical criticism has experienced the process of putting forward, rising, flourishing, declining, reviving and redeveloping, and in the eighties of the 20th century, it is the dividing line in the process of its development. Before that, its prosperity was manifested by the vigorous development of literary ethics research, then declined because of the shift of the focus of literary research and its own limitations. After that, with the ethical turn in literary and philosophical studies, ethical criticism was revived. The ethical turn is not to return to the literary criticism tradition of the 19th century, but to refute formalism and reposition literature as a cognitive way. Nor is this renaissance a reaffirmation of moral criticism, but a further development of ethical criticism, which evolves Wayne Booth's co-direction-based ethical criticism, Marsha Nussbauman's ethical evaluation based on pluralism and non-convention. Hillis Hans Muller's Reading Ethics based on text and language Theory.
【作者单位】： 华中农业大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“美国伦理批评的历时发展及其演变研究”【项目批号:12CWW004】 华中农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目“美国伦理批评的发展及其演变”【项目批号:2012ZYTS003】的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I06
本文编号：2273024
[Abstract]:As a criticism theory and criticism method, American ethical criticism has experienced the process of putting forward, rising, flourishing, declining, reviving and redeveloping, and in the eighties of the 20th century, it is the dividing line in the process of its development. Before that, its prosperity was manifested by the vigorous development of literary ethics research, then declined because of the shift of the focus of literary research and its own limitations. After that, with the ethical turn in literary and philosophical studies, ethical criticism was revived. The ethical turn is not to return to the literary criticism tradition of the 19th century, but to refute formalism and reposition literature as a cognitive way. Nor is this renaissance a reaffirmation of moral criticism, but a further development of ethical criticism, which evolves Wayne Booth's co-direction-based ethical criticism, Marsha Nussbauman's ethical evaluation based on pluralism and non-convention. Hillis Hans Muller's Reading Ethics based on text and language Theory.
【作者单位】： 华中农业大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“美国伦理批评的历时发展及其演变研究”【项目批号:12CWW004】 华中农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目“美国伦理批评的发展及其演变”【项目批号:2012ZYTS003】的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 凌海衡;艺术的伦理批评与审美批评[J];文艺研究;2003年06期
2 刘亚律;;论韦恩·布斯“隐含作者”概念的无效性[J];江西社会科学;2008年02期
3 李锦艳;;隐含作者解析[J];作家;2011年06期
4 程锡麟;析布思的小说伦理学[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年01期
5 段俊晖;;伦理批评的2种范式——列维纳斯的伦理形而上学与哈贝马斯的话语伦理学[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2008年04期
6 ;中国文艺理论学会第七次年会活动报导[J];文艺理论研究;1999年04期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 汪建峰;韦恩·布斯与西方文学批评的修辞视角[D];福建师范大学;2009年
，本文编号：2273024
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2273024.html
