新“底本”的启示与困惑——向赵毅衡教授请教
发布时间：2018-10-17 11:08
【摘要】：本文以原有叙述分层理论为参照,讨论赵毅衡《论底本:叙述如何分层》的理论贡献,认为它从符号叙述学出发,将原有的线性底本转化为非线性的聚合轴上的痕迹,改变了底本的状态与性质。它有利于从写作者角度理解底本和述本,在解释"元小说"等问题上很有效。本文对新"底本"提出一些困惑,认为对于如何从读者角度来理解底本、述本,该理论还有进一步阐发的必要,比如读者的底本与作者的底本可否同一,不同读者的底本如何整合,读者如何比较底本和述本,如何解释合著或续写作品的底本问题,如何解释非虚构叙述问题等。本文在对原"底本"概念进行梳理的基础上试着回应《论底本:叙述如何分层》要解决的三大问题,认为这三大问题并未对原有分层理论构成致命挑战。
[Abstract]:Based on the original narrative stratification theory, this paper discusses the theoretical contribution of Zhao Yiheng's "on the bottom: how to describe the stratification", and thinks that it transforms the original linear base into the trace on the nonlinear aggregation axis from the symbolic narratology. Changed the state and nature of the base. It helps to understand the original and the narration from the writer's point of view and is very effective in interpreting metafiction and other issues. This paper puts forward some puzzles about the new book, and thinks that it is necessary to further expound the theory on how to understand the original from the reader's point of view, for example, whether the reader's original and the author's original are the same. How to integrate the original of different readers, how to compare the original and the narration, how to explain the problem of co-authorship or continuation, how to explain the problem of non-fictional narration, and so on. On the basis of combing the original concept of "bottom book", this paper tries to respond to the three major problems to be solved, that is, "on the basis of discussion: how to delaminate", and holds that these three problems have not posed a fatal challenge to the original theory of stratification.
【作者单位】： 西南交通大学中文系;
【基金】：教育部人文社科项目“视觉叙事的可能与限度”(批准号:09XJC751007)阶段性成果
【分类号】：I04
[Abstract]:Based on the original narrative stratification theory, this paper discusses the theoretical contribution of Zhao Yiheng's "on the bottom: how to describe the stratification", and thinks that it transforms the original linear base into the trace on the nonlinear aggregation axis from the symbolic narratology. Changed the state and nature of the base. It helps to understand the original and the narration from the writer's point of view and is very effective in interpreting metafiction and other issues. This paper puts forward some puzzles about the new book, and thinks that it is necessary to further expound the theory on how to understand the original from the reader's point of view, for example, whether the reader's original and the author's original are the same. How to integrate the original of different readers, how to compare the original and the narration, how to explain the problem of co-authorship or continuation, how to explain the problem of non-fictional narration, and so on. On the basis of combing the original concept of "bottom book", this paper tries to respond to the three major problems to be solved, that is, "on the basis of discussion: how to delaminate", and holds that these three problems have not posed a fatal challenge to the original theory of stratification.
【作者单位】： 西南交通大学中文系;
【基金】：教育部人文社科项目“视觉叙事的可能与限度”(批准号:09XJC751007)阶段性成果
【分类号】：I04
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑庆山;文章千古事 得失寸心知——答赵建斌[J];红楼梦学刊;1998年02期
2 ;同治年间总署查核中法条约底本[J];历史档案;1988年04期
3 胡莲玉;再辨“话本”非“说话人之底本”[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2003年05期
4 余文高;;底本为何称为“蓝本”[J];教师博览;1995年12期
5 赵建斌;也谈立松轩本《石头记》——与郑庆山先生商榷[J];红楼梦学刊;1997年03期
6 刘兴汉;对“话本”理论的再审视——兼评增田涉《论“话本”的定义》[J];社会科学战线;1996年04期
7 苗苏莉;;关于新版《红楼梦》电视剧底本问题的思考[J];文教资料;2009年26期
8 杨寿康;一种提高科技翻译质量的方法──Trimble语篇分层理论的应用[J];上海科技翻译;1995年04期
9 姚s，
本文编号：2276458
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2276458.html
