当代艺术批评文化身份的主体性现状研究
发布时间:2018-02-05 23:29
本文关键词: 当代艺术批评 文化身份 主体性 出处:《西南大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:针对当代艺术批评文化身份的主体性现状,本文旨在从两个方面对其进行系统的研究,一是“当代艺术批评文化身份的主体性特征”,二是“当代艺术批评文化身份主体性缺失的成因分析”。对“当代艺术批评文化身份主体性特征”的研究,笔者主要采用了乔治·拉伦所架构的文化身份观,以及从笛卡尔开始一直到现当代阐释学所架构的主体观。在本文中,笔者向以上两者借鉴的不是它们的研究成果,而是它们的推演方式与研究方法。基于以上两点,笔者从批评文本入手,将当代艺术批评划分为特定的四种范式,分别为“现实主义批评”范式;“玩世现实主义批评”范式;“女性主义批评”范式;“后殖民主义批评”范式。通过对四种不同批评范式的归类与分析,笔者得出相应的学术结论是:当代艺术批评文化身份的主体性“缺失”这一特征,“缺失”的主体性特征是当代艺术批评最为突出的特征,它深刻影响着当代艺术及其批评的发展。文化身份是一个归属于社会意识形态之下的立场问题,其主体性现状与社会意识形态对批评家主体意识的影响密不可分。而一个国家或者一个民族意识形态的养成往往不是单方面自生的过程,基于这样的考虑,针对文化身份主体性“缺失”的成因研究,笔者主要从三个维度对其进行了讨论与阐释,分别是形成这种“缺失”现状的“政治语境”、“经济语境”和“文化语境”。通过分析,笔者得出以下学术结论:(1)导致当代艺术批评文化身份主体性“缺失”的核心因素是人们对本土文化认同感和责任感的淡漠。随着全球化进程的发展,西方文化与思想介入到中国文化领域,扩展了文化学者视野的同时也将西方文化的浪潮与思维方式带到中国,由此推论开去,给中国的文化学者效仿经济繁荣从而实现文化繁荣的想法提供了可能。但是,我们却容易因此迷失自身的文化身份。文化只有保持自己的根系,才会在全球化的浪潮中免于被消解的命运,从而展现出本土文化根深叶茂的景象。(2)政治发展的内在需要与经济政策的引导是当代艺术及艺术批评文化身份的主体性几经变幻的重要原因。改革开放以来,我国在经济上、科技上西方学习,取得了长足的进步,由此认为在文化上不假思索地假借西方一样可以取得辉煌的成果;这种逻辑导致艺术批评文化身份主体性的“缺失”成为必然。(3)艺术批评文化身份的主体性是在社会变革的过程中形成和发展起来的,我们无法将影响它的政治、经济、文化因素孤立起来,它们之间彼此关联,互为因果。(4)针对文化身份“缺失”现状的成因分析所进行的探讨及其所得出的相应学术结论,有望为当代艺术批评提供相应的理性思考与价值启示。
[Abstract]:In view of the present situation of the subjectivity of the cultural identity of contemporary art criticism, this paper aims to make a systematic study on it from two aspects, one is "the subjective characteristics of the cultural identity of contemporary art criticism". The second is "Analysis of the causes of the absence of cultural identity subjectivity in contemporary art criticism". In the study of "the subjective characteristics of cultural identity of contemporary art criticism", the author mainly adopts the cultural identity view constructed by George Lallon. And from Descartes to the modern and contemporary hermeneutics of the framework of the subjective view. In this article, the author to the above two are not their research results. Based on the above two points, the author divides contemporary art criticism into four specific paradigms, which are "realistic criticism" paradigm. The paradigm of "play realistic criticism"; "Feminist criticism" paradigm; Through the classification and analysis of four different criticism paradigms, the author draws the corresponding academic conclusion that the subjectivity of the cultural identity of contemporary art criticism is "lacking". The subjective feature of "missing" is the most prominent feature of contemporary art criticism, which deeply influences the development of contemporary art and its criticism. The present situation of subjectivity is closely related to the influence of social ideology on the subject consciousness of critics. However, the cultivation of ideology of a country or a nation is often not a process of unilateral birth, based on such considerations. In view of the research on the causes of the "absence" of the subjectivity of cultural identity, the author mainly discusses and explains it from three dimensions, which are the "political context" which forms the present situation of the "absence" of the cultural identity. "Economic context" and "Cultural context". The author draws the following academic conclusion: 1) the core factor that leads to the lack of subjectivity of cultural identity in contemporary art criticism is the indifference of people to the sense of identity and responsibility of local culture. Western culture and thought involved in the field of Chinese culture, expanding the horizons of cultural scholars, but also bring the wave of Western culture and the way of thinking to China, thus inferring. This makes it possible for Chinese cultural scholars to emulate the idea of economic prosperity and thus achieve cultural prosperity. However, it is easy for us to lose our own cultural identity. Culture only keeps its roots. To avoid the fate of being destroyed in the wave of globalization. Thus, the local culture is deeply rooted and leafy. The internal need of political development and the guidance of economic policy are the important reasons for the subjectivity of contemporary art and artistic criticism cultural identity to change several times. In economy, science and technology, western learning has made great progress, so we can make brilliant achievements in culture without thinking about the West. This logic leads to the "absence" of the cultural identity of art criticism as a necessity) the subjectivity of the cultural identity of art criticism is formed and developed in the process of social change. We cannot isolate the political, economic and cultural factors that affect it; they are interrelated. The analysis of the causes of the lack of cultural identity and the corresponding academic conclusions are expected to provide the corresponding rational thinking and value enlightenment for contemporary art criticism.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:J05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 何桂彦;;什么是当代艺术批评?[J];美术观察;2010年05期
2 刘晓路,邹跃进,王端廷;中国美术中的文化殖民问题三人谈[J];美术观察;1996年12期
3 王林;;奥利瓦不是中国艺术的救星[J];读书;1993年10期
4 栗宪庭;现代迷信的沉痛教训——谈连环画《枫》对典型环境的刻划[J];美术;1979年08期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 邱正伦;艺术创造力的主体性建构[D];西南大学;2009年
,本文编号:1493038
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/1493038.html