感性理性向左走向右走——艺术设计专业中色彩教学的探索

发布时间：2018-04-22 12:46

本文选题：艺术设计 + 色彩教学　；参考：《山东师范大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 设计色彩是在装饰色彩学、美术心理学、色彩构成学、写生色彩学和设计学等基本理论的基础上发展起来的,是一门探讨和利用色彩组合变化原理来发掘人的理性思维和创造性思维的专业课程。是帮助人们以科学的方式认识色彩、分析色彩、掌握色彩的规律和原理,并利用色彩功能的特性为设计目标服务。艺术设计专业在很大程度上区别于绘画艺术,它是实用价值与审美价值的紧密结合。需要体现科学与美学的统一、技术与艺术的统一。怎样使色彩训练成为设计造物的本质训练,而非仅是作为感性的艺术表现训练,成为设计造型教学与研究思考解决的重要问题。 “在色彩研究中历来存在着两个王国：一个是以科学和理性为基础的必然王国；一是以感性调理为特点的自由王国。”那么在现代艺术设计中,作为一名设计者对于色彩的把握应该是理性的必然多一些呢,还是自由的感受多一些呢?在培养未来的设计者的过程中强调色彩规律、色彩物理性的理性知识多一些,还是以抒发色彩感受的训练为主呢? 对于感性与理性在艺术相关问题上的探讨由来已久。然而,认识是不断发展的,对感性与理性对立统一的进一步认识只能会更趋成熟。设计艺术作为一种较为年轻的艺术科学,也是应该努力寻求其感性与理性最佳契合方式。艺术设计既具有严谨、理性的一面,又有轻松、活泼、感情丰富的一面,只有将理性和感性共同融会于其中,科学与艺术那种紧密的结合才会以独具特色的方式在艺术设计中体现出来。在色彩教学过程中明晰理性思维和感性思维的存在,既可以保证训练方式、训练内容的目的性、方向性；同时又避免了课程的重复、虚设。对于理性思维可以成为一种行之有效的理性方法或工具,从而指导艺术设计的思考及实践过程。然而,从艺术表现性质来看,表现个性偏向于把握感性,对色彩的敏锐感不是理性认识所能解决的问题,而是长期艺术修养的结果。 “没有人承认自己会扼杀个性和创造力,但在实施教学的过程中,又会担心让出个性的发展空间会影响教学体系的正规性。”这个问题的症结在于：在学会理性思考色彩与顺其自然的培养创造力之间,要做出适当的选择和平衡。事实上这二者之间有矛盾的一面,也有相辅相成的一面。对于“理性、感性”究竟向左还是向右,没有一个绝对的标准。但是在学习设计的不同阶段两者的比重还是应该明确的：在从一个设计的门外汉到步入设计之间再到艺术设计的更高殿堂,理性思维,感性思维虽伴随始终,但在不同的阶段,所扮演的角色不同。初期,学会用理性的思路来分析色彩至关重要,创造力、个性化是锦上添花,而在艺术设计这条道路上每上一个台阶,个性化和创造力都是成就设计师越走越高的根本所在。真正的设计大师从来都是打破了所有界限,在理性与感性之间游刃有余、收放自如。
[Abstract]:Design color is developed on the basis of the basic theories such as decorative color science, art psychology, color composition, painting color and design. It is a professional course to explore and use the principle of color combination to explore human rational thinking and creative thinking. It is to help people to understand color and analyze in a scientific way. Color, master the law and principle of color, and use the characteristics of color function to serve the design goal. Art design specialty is different from painting art to a great extent. It is the close combination of practical value and aesthetic value. It needs to reflect the unity of science and aesthetics, the unity of technology and art. How to make color training become a design creation The essence training, instead of merely acting as perceptual artistic expression training, has become an important issue in the teaching and research of design modeling.
"There are two kingdoms in the study of color: one is the realm of necessity based on science and reason; the other is the realm of freedom characterized by perceptual conditioning." then in modern art design, is it necessarily more rational to be a designer for the grasp of color, or is it more free to feel in the modern art design? In the process of training future designers, we should emphasize the law of color, whether there are more rational knowledge of color, or the training of expressing color perception.
There is a long history of the discussion of perceptual and rational art related issues. However, understanding is constantly developing. Further understanding of the unity of the opposites of sensibility and reason can only be more mature. As a relatively young art science, design art should also strive to find the best fit way of its sensibility and rationality. With a strict and rational side, there is a light, lively and affectionate side. It is only the combination of reason and sensibility. The close combination of science and art will be embodied in the artistic design in a unique way.
In the process of color teaching, the existence of rational thinking and perceptual thinking can not only guarantee the training mode, the purpose and the direction of the training content, but also avoid the repetition of the course. It can be an effective rational method or tool for rational thinking, so as to guide the thinking and practice process of art design. On the other hand, from the nature of artistic expression, the expression of individuality is biased towards the grasp of sensibility, and the sensitivity to color is not the problem that the rational knowledge can solve, but the result of the long-term artistic accomplishment.
"No one acknowledges that he will stifle personality and creativity, but in the course of teaching, there will be a concern that the space for development of individuality will affect the normality of the teaching system." the crux of this problem is that the proper choice and balance should be made between the rational thinking of color and the cultivation of creative creativity. There is a contradictory side between the two, and there is a complementary side. There is no absolute standard about whether "reason, sensibility" is left or right. But in different stages of learning and design, the proportion of the two should be clear: a higher Hall of art from a designed outsider to a design. Rational thinking and perceptual thinking are accompanied by all the time, but in different stages, they play different roles. In the early days, learning to use rational thinking to analyze color is essential, creativity and individualization are the icing on the cake, and every step on the road of art design, individualization and creativity are the root of the higher achievement designer. Where the real design master has broken all boundaries, and has been able to move freely between reason and sensibility.

【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：J063

【共引文献】

感性理性 向左走向右走——艺术设计专业中色彩教学的探索

感性理性向左走向右走——艺术设计专业中色彩教学的探索