“将理论继续下去”——近二十年来国内“后理论”研究综述

发布时间：2018-04-29 04:01

  本文选题：后理论 + 理论的终结　； 参考：《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：近二十年来,随着“理论终结”的声音被传递到中国,后理论研究渐成学界热点话题。人们似乎普遍认为理论在西方大势已去,中国的理论研究者也必须重新检视我们在过去追随西方理论话语的得失,一方面为国内理论研究谋求新的发展方向,同时也为中国文论的国际化寻找契机。国内后理论研究主要可被划分为五个话题,包括什么是理论、理论是否已经终结、如何克服文学研究或理论的危机、后理论时代的理论走向以及中国文论国际化等。对现有成果的综合考察可以为国内文学理论的研究和未来走向提供思路。其实,无论是倡导推进文化研究还是回归文本分析,是继续理论的政治化还是回归学术本位,都是把理论进行下去的不同方式,都是在深化理论的反思行为、补偏救弊,让它更好地适应变化了的文学与社会现实。
[Abstract]:In the past twenty years, with the sound of "theory ending" being transmitted to China, post-theoretical research has gradually become a hot topic in academic circles. It seems that there is a general belief that theories have gone by in the West, and that Chinese theoretical researchers must also re-examine the gains and losses of the western theoretical discourse in the past and, on the one hand, seek a new direction of development for domestic theoretical research. At the same time, it also seeks the opportunity for the internationalization of Chinese literary theory. Domestic post-theoretical research can be divided into five main topics, including what is theory, whether the theory has ended, how to overcome the crisis of literary research or theory, the theoretical trend of the post-theoretical era and the internationalization of Chinese literary theory. The comprehensive investigation of the existing achievements can provide ideas for the study of domestic literary theory and the future trend. In fact, whether advocating the promotion of cultural research or returning to text analysis, continuing the politicization of the theory or returning to the academic standard are all different ways of carrying out the theory. They are all deepening the reflective behavior of the theory and making up for the shortcomings. Let it better adapt to the changing literature and social reality.
，

本文编号：1818278