在“体认”与“默会”之间——论中西文论思维方式的差异与趋同

发布时间：2018-05-18 08:40

本文选题：思维方式 + 体认　；参考：《社会科学战线》2017年01期

【摘要】：中国古代学术有自己独特的话语形态,其背后隐含着独特的思维方式。与西方传统哲学那种主客体二分模式的、对象性和概念形而上学的思维方式不同,中国古代学术呈现为一种心物交融、物我一体的,具有直觉性、类比性的被称为"关联性思维"的运思方式。这种思维方式常常用"体"或"体认"来标示,可以说与西方传统哲学的"认识"或"认知"大异其趣,我们有理由把中国古代学术上居于主导地位的思维方式称之为"体认认知"。值得注意的是,19世纪后期以来,西方哲学从不同角度、以不同方式反思着自己的传统,对那种长期占据主导地位的形而上学思维方式不满,相继提出体验、存在之领悟、默会认知等概念,力求在身心统一中寻找人类思维的奥秘。这一反思的学术旨趣在某种意义上与中国传统思维方式具有了相通性,这就提供了一种对话的可能,也让人们在中西两大文化传统的这种"接近"或"趋同"中看到了未来学术的走向与希望。
[Abstract]:Ancient Chinese academic has its own unique form of discourse, behind which there is a unique mode of thinking. Different from the traditional western philosophy in the mode of dichotomy between subject and object, objectivism and conceptual metaphysics, ancient Chinese learning presented itself as a mixture of mind and object, with intuition. Analogical thinking is called "relevance thinking". This mode of thinking is often marked by "body" or "understanding", which can be said to be quite different from the "cognition" or "cognition" of western traditional philosophy. It is reasonable to call the dominant mode of thinking in ancient China as "cognitive cognition". It is worth noting that since the late 19th century, Western philosophy has reflected on its tradition from different angles and in different ways, dissatisfied with the metaphysical way of thinking that has dominated for a long time, and has successively put forward the comprehension of experience and existence. The concept of tacit cognition seeks to find the mystery of human thought in the unity of body and mind. In a sense, the academic purport of this reflection is similar to the traditional Chinese way of thinking, which provides a possibility for dialogue. It also makes people see the future academic trend and hope in this kind of "proximity" or "convergence" between Chinese and Western cultural traditions.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学文艺学研究中心;
【分类号】：I0-03

【相似文献】