萨特“介入”观研究
发布时间：2018-11-27 11:38
【摘要】：萨特是二十世纪哲学史和文学史上一个里程碑式的人物,他以其哲学思想介入政治生活和社会运动之中,并通过文学的方式来实践其理念。针对当时流行的审美无利害和艺术自律的思想,他强调在这荒诞的世界中“自由选择”的重要性,重提自我与他人的关系,并要以介入的方式去干预现实、改变现实。通过对萨特“介入观”进行阐释,并探讨其“介入观”对后来者的影响,我们可以重新思考20世纪乃至今天文学、艺术和政治的关系,同时也能让人们进一步明确自我的历史责任感和使命感。本文以萨特的“介入观”为核心,结合其具体的文学作品和哲学理论,并通过分析加缪、巴特、罗伯-格里耶等人与萨特介入思想的关系,重新阐释了其“介入观”的发生机制、内涵和影响。正文从三个部分进行展开论述:第一部分介绍了萨特“介入观”提出的时代背景并对其进行了简要界定。针对康德以来西方社会审美无利害和艺术自律的思想,萨特提出文学艺术要介入社会现实,而其方式主要是借鉴笛卡尔、黑格尔、海德格尔等人对主体和他人关系的讨论,提出“介入”正是在主体的式微与他人的凸显这一过程中发生的。同时,这种介入又具有明显的政治倾向性。第二部分详细阐释了萨特“介入”的建构机制和内涵。通过重新激活“他人”的主体性,并强调我与他人是共同存在于这个世界,所以发生联系是不可避免的,而介入世界和他人也因此成为可能。但也正是在这种关系中,人的自由是受限的,面对这一现实性问题和可能引起的冲突,萨特试图以“介入”来缓和自我与他人的矛盾。而文学,则是介入的最佳方式。第三部分考察了萨特“介入观”的影响。具体以加缪、巴特和罗伯-格里耶三位作家的观点为例,分析了他们对萨特介入理论的肯定与争执。同时还简要论述了萨特介入理论对西方马克思主义、经验主义和接受美学理论家的影响。
[Abstract]:Sartre is a landmark figure in the history of philosophy and literature in the 20th century. He takes part in political life and social movement with his philosophical thoughts and practices his ideas through literature. In view of the popular thought of aesthetic self-discipline and artistic self-discipline at that time, he emphasized the importance of "free choice" in this absurd world, raised the relationship between self and others, and intervened in reality and changed reality. By explaining Sartre's "concept of intervention" and discussing its influence on the latecomers, we can rethink the relationship between literature, art and politics in the 20th century and today. At the same time, it can also make people more clear about their sense of historical responsibility and mission. This paper focuses on Sartre's "concept of intervention", combines his specific literary works and philosophical theories, and analyzes the relationship between Camus, Bart, Roberto Greyer and Sartre's interventional thoughts. It reinterprets the mechanism, connotation and influence of its "intervention view". The text is discussed from three parts: the first part introduces the background of Sartre's concept of intervention and briefly defines it. In view of Kant's thought that there is no interest in aesthetics and artistic self-discipline in western society, Sartre puts forward that literature and art should be involved in social reality, and its way is mainly to draw lessons from the discussion of the relationship between subject and others by Descartes, Hegel, Heidegger, etc. It is in the process of subject's decline and others' prominence that "intervention" is put forward. At the same time, this kind of intervention also has the obvious political tendency. The second part explains the construction mechanism and connotation of Sartre's intervention in detail. By reactivating the subjectivity of "others" and emphasizing that I and others are co-existing in this world, it is inevitable to connect, and it is thus possible to intervene in the world and others. But it is in this relationship that human freedom is restricted. In the face of this realistic problem and the possible conflict, Sartre tries to ease the contradiction between himself and others by "intervening". Literature, on the other hand, is the best way to intervene. The third part examines the influence of Sartre's concept of intervention. Taking the views of Camus, Bart and Roberto Greyer as examples, this paper analyzes their affirmation and dispute about Sartre's intervention theory. It also briefly discusses the influence of Sartre's intervention theory on Western Marxism, empiricism and reception aesthetics theorists.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I01
本文编号：2360612
[Abstract]:Sartre is a landmark figure in the history of philosophy and literature in the 20th century. He takes part in political life and social movement with his philosophical thoughts and practices his ideas through literature. In view of the popular thought of aesthetic self-discipline and artistic self-discipline at that time, he emphasized the importance of "free choice" in this absurd world, raised the relationship between self and others, and intervened in reality and changed reality. By explaining Sartre's "concept of intervention" and discussing its influence on the latecomers, we can rethink the relationship between literature, art and politics in the 20th century and today. At the same time, it can also make people more clear about their sense of historical responsibility and mission. This paper focuses on Sartre's "concept of intervention", combines his specific literary works and philosophical theories, and analyzes the relationship between Camus, Bart, Roberto Greyer and Sartre's interventional thoughts. It reinterprets the mechanism, connotation and influence of its "intervention view". The text is discussed from three parts: the first part introduces the background of Sartre's concept of intervention and briefly defines it. In view of Kant's thought that there is no interest in aesthetics and artistic self-discipline in western society, Sartre puts forward that literature and art should be involved in social reality, and its way is mainly to draw lessons from the discussion of the relationship between subject and others by Descartes, Hegel, Heidegger, etc. It is in the process of subject's decline and others' prominence that "intervention" is put forward. At the same time, this kind of intervention also has the obvious political tendency. The second part explains the construction mechanism and connotation of Sartre's intervention in detail. By reactivating the subjectivity of "others" and emphasizing that I and others are co-existing in this world, it is inevitable to connect, and it is thus possible to intervene in the world and others. But it is in this relationship that human freedom is restricted. In the face of this realistic problem and the possible conflict, Sartre tries to ease the contradiction between himself and others by "intervening". Literature, on the other hand, is the best way to intervene. The third part examines the influence of Sartre's concept of intervention. Taking the views of Camus, Bart and Roberto Greyer as examples, this paper analyzes their affirmation and dispute about Sartre's intervention theory. It also briefly discusses the influence of Sartre's intervention theory on Western Marxism, empiricism and reception aesthetics theorists.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I01
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 毕晓;;论萨特的“介入文学”与罗兰·巴特的“作者之死”[J];国外文学;2014年02期
2 马大康;孙鹏程;;跨越自律性与功利性之间的鸿沟——论萨特的文学艺术虚构观[J];文艺研究;2012年05期
3 赵勇;;征服读者群:《什么是文学?》中的大众观[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
4 鲍俊晓;;萨特的词语观[J];贵州社会科学;2011年07期
5 杨深;;时间性·介入·政治有效性——萨特与加缪的一场世纪争论的启示[J];哲学研究;2011年03期
6 杨令飞;;论罗伯-格里耶与萨特的文学之争[J];广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
7 辛筱倩;徐国华;;试论萨特的存在主义戏剧《苍蝇》[J];戏剧文学;2010年06期
8 杨深;;论萨特的“介入文学”[J];江苏行政学院学报;2008年05期
9 王岳川;;萨特存在论三阶段与文学介入说[J];社会科学;2008年06期
10 赵勇;;文学介入与知识分子的角色扮演 萨特《什么是文学?》的一种解读[J];外国文学;2007年04期
，本文编号：2360612
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2360612.html
