从《爱玛》两个中译本看译者的主体性
发布时间：2018-11-22 10:57
【摘要】：二十世纪七十年代,西方翻译理论界出现了“文化转向”,这一现象的出现推动了翻译学科的研究从语言层面转向文化层面,从原语研究转向译入语的研究,自此,译者的作用逐渐凸显,其边缘化的地位逐步得到改善,译者主体性也成为翻译研究的新视角。 《爱玛》是英国女作家简·奥斯汀无论是在思想上还是在艺术上都最为成熟的一部小说。二十世纪四十年代以来,《爱玛》在我国有多种译本,其中最有代表性的是民国时期刘重德的译本和二十世纪九十年代孙致礼的译本。以往对《爱玛》不同译本的研究侧重于从语言学的角度比较分析不同译本的翻译策略,而对制约主体性因素的系统研究却略显不足。本文运用译者主体性的相关理论,从选材、语言和文化等角度比较两个译本,分析译者主体性的差异,探讨两个译本中制约译者主体性的因素,指出社会意识形态、译者的翻译思想和读者的期待视野对产生译者主体性的差异具有重要影响。 论文的前言部分阐述了论文研究目的和意义,第二章为文献回顾,主要探讨中西方学者对译者主体性的研究,以及国内外关于爱玛以及其译本的研究。第三章分析了前人关于译者主体性的不同理解,探讨了译者主体性的内涵和特征,指出译者主体性是指作为翻译主体的译者在尊重原文、原作者和目的语读者的前提下,为实现翻译目的所发挥的主观能动性,同时,在发挥主观能动性的同时,又不可避免地受到内在和外在因素的影响。第四章通过对《爱玛》两个中译本的比较研究,具体分析了译者主体性的三个特征在翻译过程中的体现,如译者对译本和表达方式的选择反映了译者的主观能动性,译者根据各自的目的采用不同的翻译策略反映了译者的为我性,而译者受到意识形态和个人因素的影响则反映了译者的受动性。文章的结论部分对文章进行了总结。 本文通过对《爱玛》译本的比较,揭示出,译者虽然受到各种条件的制约,但仍能积极发挥主观能动性；文学翻译中应历史地看待译者和作品,着眼于特定历史时期的意识形态、译者的自身因素以及读者的期待视野,从而达到文化交流的目的。
[Abstract]:In the 1970s, the "cultural turn" appeared in the western translation theorists, which promoted the study of translation from the linguistic level to the cultural level, from the study of the source language to the study of the target language. The translator's role is becoming more and more prominent, his marginalization has been improved gradually, and the translator's subjectivity has become a new perspective in translation studies. Emma is the most mature novel of British female writer Jane Austen both in thought and art. Since the 1940s, there have been many versions of Emma in China, the most representative of which are the versions of Liu Chongde in the Republic of China and Sun Zhili in the 1990s. Previous studies on different versions of Emma have focused on the comparative analysis of translation strategies of different versions from a linguistic point of view, but the systematic study of the constraints on subjectivity has been somewhat inadequate. Based on the relevant theories of translator's subjectivity, this paper compares the two versions from the perspectives of selection, language and culture, analyzes the differences of the translator's subjectivity, probes into the factors restricting the translator's subjectivity in the two versions, and points out the social ideology. The translator's translation thought and the reader's horizon of expectation have an important influence on the difference of the translator's subjectivity. In the foreword, the purpose and significance of the research are described. Chapter two is a literature review, which mainly discusses the study of translator subjectivity by Chinese and Western scholars, as well as the study of Emma and her translation at home and abroad. Chapter three analyzes the different understandings of the translator's subjectivity, discusses the connotation and characteristics of the translator's subjectivity, and points out that the translator's subjectivity means that the translator, as the subject of translation, respects the source text, the original author and the target language reader. At the same time, it is inevitably influenced by internal and external factors while exerting subjective initiative for the purpose of translation. Chapter four makes a comparative study of the two Chinese versions of Emma and analyzes in detail the three features of the translator's subjectivity in the process of translation, such as the translator's choice of the translation and the mode of expression, which reflects the translator's subjective initiative. Translators adopt different translation strategies according to their respective aims to reflect their selfishness, while the translators are influenced by ideology and personal factors to reflect their movability. The conclusion of the article summarizes the article. By comparing the translation of Emma, this paper reveals that although the translator is restricted by various conditions, he can still exert his initiative actively. In literary translation, translators and works should be viewed historically, and the ideology, the translator's own factors and the readers' expectation should be considered in order to achieve the purpose of cultural exchange.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I561.074;H315.9
本文编号：2349138
[Abstract]:In the 1970s, the "cultural turn" appeared in the western translation theorists, which promoted the study of translation from the linguistic level to the cultural level, from the study of the source language to the study of the target language. The translator's role is becoming more and more prominent, his marginalization has been improved gradually, and the translator's subjectivity has become a new perspective in translation studies. Emma is the most mature novel of British female writer Jane Austen both in thought and art. Since the 1940s, there have been many versions of Emma in China, the most representative of which are the versions of Liu Chongde in the Republic of China and Sun Zhili in the 1990s. Previous studies on different versions of Emma have focused on the comparative analysis of translation strategies of different versions from a linguistic point of view, but the systematic study of the constraints on subjectivity has been somewhat inadequate. Based on the relevant theories of translator's subjectivity, this paper compares the two versions from the perspectives of selection, language and culture, analyzes the differences of the translator's subjectivity, probes into the factors restricting the translator's subjectivity in the two versions, and points out the social ideology. The translator's translation thought and the reader's horizon of expectation have an important influence on the difference of the translator's subjectivity. In the foreword, the purpose and significance of the research are described. Chapter two is a literature review, which mainly discusses the study of translator subjectivity by Chinese and Western scholars, as well as the study of Emma and her translation at home and abroad. Chapter three analyzes the different understandings of the translator's subjectivity, discusses the connotation and characteristics of the translator's subjectivity, and points out that the translator's subjectivity means that the translator, as the subject of translation, respects the source text, the original author and the target language reader. At the same time, it is inevitably influenced by internal and external factors while exerting subjective initiative for the purpose of translation. Chapter four makes a comparative study of the two Chinese versions of Emma and analyzes in detail the three features of the translator's subjectivity in the process of translation, such as the translator's choice of the translation and the mode of expression, which reflects the translator's subjective initiative. Translators adopt different translation strategies according to their respective aims to reflect their selfishness, while the translators are influenced by ideology and personal factors to reflect their movability. The conclusion of the article summarizes the article. By comparing the translation of Emma, this paper reveals that although the translator is restricted by various conditions, he can still exert his initiative actively. In literary translation, translators and works should be viewed historically, and the ideology, the translator's own factors and the readers' expectation should be considered in order to achieve the purpose of cultural exchange.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I561.074;H315.9
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 金敬红,周茗宇;从“隐形”翻译看译者的主体性[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2004年06期
2 陈霞;;翻译目的的实现与方法选择——结合《爱玛》的两个译本[J];贵州工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
3 袁莉;文学翻译主体的诠释学研究构想[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2003年03期
4 孙致礼!洛阳036信箱30号,河南洛阳471003;翻译的异化与归化[J];山东外语教学;2001年01期
5 侯林平;姜泗平;;我国近十年来译者主体性研究的回顾与反思[J];山东科技大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
6 王玉j;论主体性的基本内涵与特点[J];天府新论;1995年06期
7 袁莉;也谈文学翻译之主体意识[J];中国翻译;1996年03期
8 孙致礼;中国的文学翻译:从归化趋向异化[J];中国翻译;2002年01期
9 许钧;“创造性叛逆”和翻译主体性的确立[J];中国翻译;2003年01期
10 穆雷,诗怡;翻译主体的“发现”与研究——兼评中国翻译家研究[J];中国翻译;2003年01期
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前3条
1 李斐;译者的主体性对译本的影响[D];华东师范大学;2006年
2 裴帆;从《爱玛》译本比较看译者主体性的体现[D];上海外国语大学;2007年
3 李艳林;从“目的论”视角阐述鲁迅的译者主体性[D];中南大学;2009年
，本文编号：2349138
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/2349138.html
