文化的囚徒：《就说是睡着了》的新精神分析法阐释
发布时间：2020-10-10 17:11
【摘要】：亨利·罗思的代表作《就说是睡着了》(1934)可谓美国曾最令人遗憾地被遗忘的文学作品之一,19世纪60年代被发掘,始备受瞩目。但在中国学界仍未受足够关注作品讲述一犹太移民男孩戴维如何竭力适应纽约贫民窟的章年生活作品对戴维心理展开了深邃的探究。现有评论大都忽略了特定文化下戴维这一焦虑重重又挣扎不休的犹太孩童形象,因而难以获得作品的真实意义 本文运用卡伦·霍妮所代表的新精神分析法,分析戴维异常心理及举止,研究其神经症人格结构形成与发展过程,并得出结论,认为文化因素在这一神经症结构中起着决定性作用,从而揭示作品主题意义戴维同常的生活充斥着无助感恐惧感和愧疚感它们构成戴维的“基本焦虑”、为寻求自信与安全,戴维采用三种防御策略:回避亲近和对抗,以应对其焦虑,其中以回避为中心策略这些策略并未为他解脱“基本焦虑”,相反使他陷入“基本冲突”的泥沼如此焦虑与冲突弥漫于其整个人格,导致神经症的出现。笔者将其解释为文化紊乱症,它始自家庭,因为父亲的冷漠无情和母亲的过分溺爱;根源于冲突的文化环境,其中犹太人的性种族与宗教等文化禁忌受到强势文化规范的冲击和压迫敏感脆弱的戴维深陷此境而无由解脱,他心理应对的失败被物化为神经症,后者又进一步强化了前者的效果,最终导致戴维整个人格的囚困。归根结底说,由于作品的自传成分,戴维的神经症也就是罗思60年创作阻滞的根本原因《就说是睡着》本质上是犹太人的悲剧,也是受制于霸权文化者的悲剧;是关于每个犹太人都被迫抉择的同化与异化的文化寓言;是一曲被囚虐,再被引诱终于误入瓮中者的挽歌;是一个文化囚徒的故事 本论文包括5个章节。第一章为引言。第二章运用该理论分析戴维神经症结构第四章接着分析戴维神经症结构的文化诱因,揭示作品主题意义,并回答罗思著名的创作阻滞问题最后是论文结论。
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：I712.074
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Chinese Synopsis
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Issues in Call It Sleep and the Author and Aim of the Research
1.2 Existing Researches on the Issues
1.3 Methodology Adopted
1.3.1 Adoption of Neo-psychoanalysis
1.3.2 The Adequacy of Karen Horney's Theory as the framework for analysis
1.4 Preview of the Following Sections
Chapter Two David's Neurosis Structure
2.1 Theory of Basic Anxiety
2.2 David's Neurotic Anxiety
2.2.1 Helplessness
2.2.2 Fear
2.2.3 Guilt
2.2.4 Basic Anxiety
2.3 David's Defense Strategy and Neurosis Conflicts
2.3.1 Initial Defense Strategy
2.3.1.1 The Strategy of Withdrawal
2.3.1.2 The Strategy of Compliance
2.3.1.3 The Strategy of Aggression
2.3.2 The Dominating Strategy
2.3.3 Variable Structure of Defense Strategy
2.3.3.1 "Flighty Mama"
2.3.3.2 The "Messiah"
2.3.3.3 "Day of Last Judgment"
2.3.4 Basic Conflict
2.4 The Neurosis of David
Chapter Three Neurosis as Cultural Disorder in Call It Sleep and Its Projection
3.1 Horney's Cultural Determinism
3.2 Cultural Codes Manifested by David
3.2.1 Background
3.2.2 Assimilation and Alienation
3.2.2.1 Jews and Americans
3.2.2.2 Jews and Catholics
3.2.3 Sexual Taboo
3.3 Projection of Neurosis and Roth's Block
3.4 Conclusion
Chapter Four Conclusion
4.1 Conclusion
4.2 Implications and Limitations of the Research
Bibliography
【参考文献】
本文编号：2835351
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：I712.074
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Chinese Synopsis
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Issues in Call It Sleep and the Author and Aim of the Research
1.2 Existing Researches on the Issues
1.3 Methodology Adopted
1.3.1 Adoption of Neo-psychoanalysis
1.3.2 The Adequacy of Karen Horney's Theory as the framework for analysis
1.4 Preview of the Following Sections
Chapter Two David's Neurosis Structure
2.1 Theory of Basic Anxiety
2.2 David's Neurotic Anxiety
2.2.1 Helplessness
2.2.2 Fear
2.2.3 Guilt
2.2.4 Basic Anxiety
2.3 David's Defense Strategy and Neurosis Conflicts
2.3.1 Initial Defense Strategy
2.3.1.1 The Strategy of Withdrawal
2.3.1.2 The Strategy of Compliance
2.3.1.3 The Strategy of Aggression
2.3.2 The Dominating Strategy
2.3.3 Variable Structure of Defense Strategy
2.3.3.1 "Flighty Mama"
2.3.3.2 The "Messiah"
2.3.3.3 "Day of Last Judgment"
2.3.4 Basic Conflict
2.4 The Neurosis of David
Chapter Three Neurosis as Cultural Disorder in Call It Sleep and Its Projection
3.1 Horney's Cultural Determinism
3.2 Cultural Codes Manifested by David
3.2.1 Background
3.2.2 Assimilation and Alienation
3.2.2.1 Jews and Americans
3.2.2.2 Jews and Catholics
3.2.3 Sexual Taboo
3.3 Projection of Neurosis and Roth's Block
3.4 Conclusion
Chapter Four Conclusion
4.1 Conclusion
4.2 Implications and Limitations of the Research
Bibliography
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前2条
1 乔国强;“死去”还是“再生——析亨利·罗思的《就说是睡着了》[J];国外文学;2004年02期
2 ;2000年第16卷第1期摘要[J];应用数学学报;2000年01期
本文编号：2835351
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/2835351.html
