庄子与德里达：解构思想比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-24 15:20

本文选题：《庄子》 + 德里达　；参考：《哈尔滨师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：庄子是我国先秦时期伟大的哲学家、思想家和文学家,是道家学说的主要创始人，与道家始祖老子并称为“老庄”，二人的哲学思想体系，被思想学术界尊为“老庄哲学”。《庄子》一书是庄子一生的著述，汪洋恣肆，洋洋洒洒，在先秦诸子散文中独树一帜、无以伦比，是值得我们永久挖掘的艺术宝藏。德里达（Derrida,1930—2004）是二十世纪法国著名的哲学家、符号学家、文艺理论家和美学家，解构主义思潮的创始人，德里达用解构颠覆了西方传统“在场’的形而上学、逻各斯中心主义和语音中心主义。庄子的思想与德里达的解构思想产生于不同的文明国度，二者相隔两千多年，但是二者都旨在消除理性专制的主导地位，在某些方面有很大的相似度。本文立足于解构思想，对《庄子》中体现出的解构思想与德里达的解构思想进行平行的比较研究。庄子思想与德里达解构思想的契合，，体现了庄子的思想不仅是以儒家思想为主体的中国传统思想的重要组成部分，更是世界思想宝库中一枚瑰丽的宝石，体现了中华民族文明精髓的庄子思想生生不息的力量。本论文对《庄子》原著和德里达原著的细致解读入手，充分把握已有的研究成果，进行了《庄子》与德里达解构思想的比较研究。全文分为绪论、正文和结论三个大部分，其中正文部分可以分为以下三个章节：第一章，探讨了《庄子》与德里达的解构思想的基点，《庄子》的“道”和德里达的解构思想在反传统、反权威方面的不同表现，从而明确《庄子》与德里达对真理的不同态度；第二章，分析了《庄子》与德里达解构思想的解构策略，即“齐物论”和“解构二元对立”，通过探讨明确了《庄子》与德里达都对传统权威进行了彻底的颠覆；第三章，《庄子》与德里达都极度关切语言的本质问题，通过探讨《庄子》的言意观和德里达的延异理论，从而明确了《庄子》与德里达通过否定语言而形成了“本体论”和“非本体论”的哲学。
[Abstract]:Zhuangzi is a great philosopher, thinker and writer in the pre-Qin period of our country. He is the main founder of Taoist theory, and he is called "Lao Zhuang" by Laozi, the first ancestor of Taoism. Zhuangzi is regarded as "Laozhuang philosophy" by ideological and academic circles. Zhuangzi is a book of Zhuangzi's life. Derridaan (1930-2004) is a famous French philosopher, semiotics, literary theorist and aesthetician in the 20th century, the founder of deconstruction thought. Derrida subverted the "presence" metaphysics of western tradition by deconstruction. Logos centralism and phonological centralism. Zhuangzi's thought and Derrida's deconstruction thought originated from different civilized countries, which were separated for more than two thousand years, but both aimed at eliminating the dominant position of rational autocracy and had great similarity in some aspects. Based on the deconstruction thought, this paper makes a parallel comparative study of the deconstruction thought embodied in Zhuangzi and Derrida's deconstruction thought. The consonance between Zhuangzi's thought and Derrida's deconstruction reflects that Zhuangzi's thought is not only an important part of Chinese traditional thought with Confucianism as the main body, but also a magnificent gem in the treasure-house of world thought. Reflecting the essence of the Chinese civilization Zhuangzi thought of endless strength. This paper begins with the detailed interpretation of Zhuangzi's original and Derrida's original works, fully grasps the existing research results, and makes a comparative study of the deconstruction thoughts of Zhuangzi and Derrida. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text can be divided into the following three chapters: chapter one, This paper probes into the basic points of the deconstruction thoughts of Zhuangzi and Derrida, the different manifestations of the Tao of Zhuangzi and the deconstruction of Derrida in the aspects of anti-tradition and anti-authority, so as to clarify the different attitudes of Zhuangzi and Derrida to the truth. This paper analyzes the deconstruction strategies of Zhuangzi and Derrida, that is, "the theory of the Qi thing" and "the dual opposition of deconstruction", and clarifies that both Zhuangzi and Derrida subvert the traditional authority thoroughly. In Chapter three, both Zhuangzi and Derrida are extremely concerned about the essence of language. By discussing Zhuangzi's theory of speech and meaning and Derrida's theory of extension, Therefore, Zhuangzi and Derrida formed the philosophy of ontology and non-ontology by negating language.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I0;B223.5

【参考文献】