“叙事学新发展”还是“伦理批评新道路”——叙事伦理的提出及其理论价值

发布时间：2018-04-24 15:53

本文选题：叙事伦理 + 叙事学新发展　；参考：《江汉论坛》2009年07期

【摘要】：近年来,"叙事伦理"逐渐成为时髦词汇,走俏于中西文论界。但由于具体语境的规约,中西学者各自强调叙事伦理意涵的一端:布斯等西方学者在"叙事学新发展"的意义上,侧重叙事机制的分析;刘小枫等中国学者则在"伦理批评新道路"的向度上,偏重伦理意涵的阐释。这两种理解和运用方式有其具体历史语境的合理性和不可否认的学术意义。但设若跳出中西文化语境的制约,从文论自身的逻辑类型及其历史发展的高度来看,中西学者对叙事伦理的阐述,其实均未触及它所潜含的真正价值:两种文论类型也即伦理批评和形式批评有机结合的综合化发展趋势。
[Abstract]:In recent years, narrative ethics has gradually become a fashionable word, popular in the field of Chinese and Western literary theory. However, due to the rules of specific context, Chinese and Western scholars emphasize one end of narrative ethics: Booth and other western scholars focus on the analysis of narrative mechanism in the sense of "new development of narratology"; Liu Xiaofeng and other Chinese scholars put emphasis on the interpretation of ethical implication in the direction of "new way of ethical criticism". These two ways of understanding and application have the rationality of specific historical context and undeniable academic significance. However, from the perspective of the logical types of literary theory itself and its historical development, the Chinese and Western scholars expound the narrative ethics, if they jump out of the restriction of the Chinese and Western cultural context and look at it from the perspective of their own logic types and historical development. In fact, none of them has touched the true value it contains: the comprehensive development trend of the organic combination of ethical criticism and formal criticism between the two types of literary theory.
【作者单位】：湖南科技大学人文学院;
【基金】：湖南省教育厅重点课题《“现代性”与百年中国文学潮流研究》(08A020)成果之一
【分类号】：I06

【参考文献】