雅俗与正变之间的“艺术”范畴——中国古典学术体系中的术语考察

发布时间：2018-04-25 05:26

本文选题：艺术 + 雅俗　；参考：《文艺研究》2014年01期

【摘要】："艺术"在中国古代不是一个普通概念,它绝无仅有地横跨经、史、子、集四大部类,是连接雅与俗、正与变的中间学术范畴。作为"匉"的传统和"圫"的传统的并称,史志列传中的广义"艺术"概念包括术数、方技、工艺三个部分,分别为巫、医、工所专。进入图书目录之后",艺术"转移并收束为书、画、琴、印、棋,成为士人日常修习的余技。因偏离经义,"艺术"从经部降格为子部,被论定为"学问之余事";而与经史明确的源流正变关系,保证了它与学问的一体性,从而成为介于雅与俗、正与变、道与器之间的"游艺"之学。中国古代学术并不在意研究对象的统一,琴棋书画实非独立的学术范畴",艺术"的性质也绝非审美和娱情所能概括。脱离对整个学术体系的考察,很容易出现以西格中、以今律古的问题,抽象术语背后的中西学术体系并不在同一个向度展开。
[Abstract]:"Art" in ancient China is not a common concept, it is unique across the classics, history, children, collection of four major categories, is the connection between elegance and vulgarity, and change of the middle academic category. As the tradition of "roaring" and the tradition of "Li", the broad concept of "art" in Shi Zhi's biography consists of three parts: the number of art, the technique of prescription and the technology, which are specialized in sorcery, medicine and engineering. After entering the catalogue of books, "art" was transferred and merged into books, paintings, harps, prints and chess, which became the daily spare skill of scholars. As a result of deviating from the classics, "art" has been downgraded from the classics to a subdivision, which has been regarded as "the surplus of knowledge"; and the relationship with the clear source and flow of the classics is changing, thus ensuring its unity with learning, thus becoming between elegance and vulgarity, and between the positive and the changing. The study of "play" between Tao and weapon. Ancient Chinese academic does not care about the unity of the object of study, Qin Qi calligraphy and painting is not an independent academic category ", art" nature is by no means aesthetic and entertainment can be summed up. Apart from the investigation of the whole academic system, it is easy to appear the problem of "Xige" and "Xiguang", and the Chinese and Western academic systems behind abstract terms are not carried out in the same direction.
【作者单位】：中央美术学院人文学院;
【基金】：中央美术学院中央高校基本科研业务费专项(JQN-120002)资助
【分类号】：J120.9

【共引文献】