中美媒体对北京特大暴雨报道的批评性语篇分析

发布时间：2018-03-07 18:22

本文选题：批评性语篇分析　切入点：新闻报道　出处：《哈尔滨工业大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：新闻报刊，作为大众媒体的主要形式，是人们认识和了解世界的重要方式。然而它们呈现给我们的并不是完全客观的世界，而是一个被理解和加工过的的世界，报道者由于受到各种利害关系以及意识形态取向的驱使，都需要对事实进行修辞化和策略化处理。因此，本文以2012年7月22日发生在北京的特大暴雨为背景，以《纽约时报》和《中国日报》这两家媒体对此次特大暴雨的相关报道为样本，，从批评性语篇分析的角度来看中美媒体是如何对北京特大暴雨进行报道的，以及是如何通过话语把权力阶层的意识形态隐藏于新闻文本之中的。本文以费尔克拉夫的三维分析模式以及韩礼德的系统功能语法为分析工具，用对比分析方法对中美两家媒体的报道进行定量和定性研究。定性研究从及物性、词汇选择、转换和情态几个方面来分析中美媒体报道语篇的词汇、话语等句法结构特征，进而结合中美社会文化语境和不同意识形态对两家媒体对该事件报道的侧重点和倾向性进行阐述。定量研究主要通过统计报道中消息来源（采访对象）和转述方式（直接或间接）来揭示两家媒体报道的客观程度和刻意操纵性；通过分析可以看出，由于中美政治经济文化背景不同，媒体代表的利益不同，其报道特点也存在差异。研究的结论是新闻报道并不完全客观公正，渗透着报道者以及其所属的权力阶层的意识形态。由于中美政治经济文化存在差异，两家媒体在对此事件进行报道时的视角不同，报道所选择的实例也不同。但是《中国日报》更注重报道暴雨事件本身，而《纽约时报》则强调暴雨发生背后的原因及其产生的影响，并对此事件进行问责。试图塑造西方人眼中的中国政府形象。
[Abstract]:The press, as the main form of mass media, is an important way for people to understand and understand the world. However, what they present to us is not a completely objective world, but a world that has been understood and processed. Driven by various interests and ideological orientations, the reporter needs to deal with the facts rhetorically and strategically. Therefore, this paper is based on the heavy rain that occurred in Beijing on July 22nd 2012. Taking the New York Times and China Daily's reports on the torrential rain as samples, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, we can see how the Chinese and American media reported the heavy rainfall in Beijing. And how to hide the ideology of the power class in the news text through discourse. Using Felke's three-dimensional analysis model and Halliday's systemic functional grammar as an analytical tool, this paper makes a quantitative and qualitative study of Chinese and American media reports by means of contrastive analysis. This paper analyzes the syntactic structure characteristics of Chinese and American media reports, such as vocabulary, discourse, and so on, in terms of transformation and modality. Then the emphasis and tendency of the two media reports on the event are expounded in the context of Chinese and American sociocultural context and different ideologies. The quantitative study is mainly based on the sources (interview subjects) and the reporting parties in the statistical reports. To reveal the objective degree and deliberate manipulation of the two media reports; Through the analysis, we can see that because of the different political, economic and cultural backgrounds of China and the United States, the interests of media representatives are different, and the characteristics of their reports are also different. The conclusion of the study is that the news report is not completely objective and fair, and permeates the ideology of the reporter and the power class to which he belongs. Due to the differences in the political, economic, cultural and cultural differences between China and the United States, the two media have different perspectives in reporting on this incident. The examples selected for the report are also different. However, the China Daily pays more attention to reporting the rainstorm itself, while the New York Times emphasizes the causes behind the rainstorm and its impact. And responsible for the incident, trying to shape the image of the Chinese government in the eyes of Westerners.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G212;H15;H315

【相似文献】