中国人聊天的多角度探究

发布时间：2018-04-28 14:48

本文选题：中国人聊天 + 跨文化交际　；参考：《华中师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以受访的75名美国师生和50名中国师生为基础,利用描述性、结构性和对比性的问题以及实际言语的观察记录,对中国人聊天进行了详细的解释说明,并通过中国人和美国人的聊天对比,为实际对外汉语教学提供了参考意见。我们基于海姆斯的言语社团理论,用来划分本文提到的特殊的“言语社团”：中国师生言语社团和美国师生言语社团。这是一次大胆的尝试——我们需要面对数据本身所存在的局限,以及个人经验和经历差异的影响。但从可行性的角度来说,这样的划分和定义不仅拓宽了视野,而且为接下来的研究提供了参考,更重要的是这也正是本文的创新之处,因为我们所依赖的是我们细致的观察和详细的记录,既记录文本信息,也描述肢体动作、表情。最重要的是我们在参考研究成果的基础上,提出了我们自己的标准并以此进行分析归纳,并由此得出美国人在“人情”和“事理”两个层面与中国人聊天产生困难,这不仅涉及语言表达,更重要的是文化心理的差异。本文共分为六个章节,第一章着重简述了选题的意义和价值,以及国内外研究成果,可以看到国内研究缺乏概括性,无论是网络聊天抑或是跨文化交际,这其中包含着非常多的交叉现象；第二章着重阐述本文主题的由来、初步观察所发现的问题以及数据内容和结构,提出了两个言语社团概念；第三章作为本文的根基,描述了中国人聊天的框架结构以及所反映的中国文化的特点,与其他文章不同的是,我们解析了中国人聊天的诸多细节,分析得更为全面,是具备概括性特质的；第四章是本文的核心,通过对比分析,我们能较为全面地看到中国人和美国人聊天的不同以及文化心理的差异。我们跳出了常见的文化差异对比的思路,并没有从理论的必然性出发,而是根据观察所得来做出判断,我们更加看重的是清晰的逻辑思路,这是我们多年学习工作的成果总结,这个思路会成为我们继续努力的蓝本；第五章我们从对外汉语教学的角度,依据调查研究的结果,给出教学建议和意见；第六章我们总结了全文,不仅是对整个文章的梳理,也对上文未能详细说明的诸多方面做出了我们自己的猜测,希望能在今后的研究中取得突破。
[Abstract]:Based on 75 American teachers and students and 50 Chinese teachers and students interviewed in this paper, using descriptive, structural and contrastive questions as well as the observation records of actual words, this paper gives a detailed explanation of Chinese chat. And through the Chinese and American chat comparison, for the actual teaching of Chinese as a foreign language to provide reference. Based on Helms' theory of speech association, we use it to divide the special "speech societies" mentioned in this paper: the Chinese Teacher-Student speech Society and the American Teacher-teacher speech Association. This is a bold attempt-we have to face the limitations of the data itself, as well as the impact of individual experience and experience differences. But from the point of view of feasibility, this kind of division and definition not only broadens the horizon, but also provides the reference for the following research. More importantly, this is the innovation of this paper. Because what we rely on is our careful observation and detailed recording, recording text information as well as describing body movements and expressions. The most important thing is that we put forward our own standards on the basis of reference to the research results and analyze and sum them up, and from this we can draw the conclusion that Americans have difficulties in chatting with Chinese people at the two levels of "human feelings" and "principles." This not only involves the language expression, more importantly is the cultural psychology difference. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter focuses on the significance and value of the topic, as well as the domestic and foreign research results, it can be seen that domestic research is lack of generality, whether it is online chat or cross-cultural communication. The second chapter focuses on the origin of the theme of this paper, preliminary observation of the problems and data content and structure, put forward two concepts of speech community. Chapter three is the foundation of this paper. This paper describes the frame structure of Chinese chat and the characteristics of Chinese culture. Different from other articles, we analyze many details of Chinese chat, which are more comprehensive and have the characteristics of generality; The fourth chapter is the core of this paper, through comparative analysis, we can fully see the differences between Chinese and Americans, as well as cultural psychological differences. Instead of starting from the inevitability of theory, we make judgments based on observations. What we value more is clear logical thinking, which is a summary of the results of our years of study. This idea will become a blueprint for our continued efforts. Chapter five, from the perspective of teaching Chinese as a foreign language, according to the results of the investigation and research, gives our teaching suggestions and opinions. Chapter VI summarizes the full text, not only a review of the whole article, We have also made our own guess on many aspects that have not been explained in detail above, hoping to make a breakthrough in future research.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H195

【参考文献】