塞尔言语行为中的意向性问题探究
发布时间：2018-08-03 06:42
【摘要】：对意向性问题的探究,历来都受到诸多哲学家,尤其是受到语言分析哲学家的青睐,塞尔就是其中的典型代表：“意向性的问题把当代哲学中的两个最中心的问题联系起来：第一,‘语言怎样与实在相关联’(这是所有语言哲学家都以这种或那种方式涉及的问题)?第二,‘什么是人类行为的本质?什么是解释一个行动?为什么自然科学的方法不可能在人类行为的研究中引起那类他们已经在其他地方成功的结果?’这两类常见的问题都汇合于意图性的难题上来了。”①在塞尔看来,意向性是表达一个完整言语行为的前提,说话者通过言语行为的意向性传达其意义,换言之,意向性是构成完美言语的骨骼,并与其有着深层的关联性。人们通过语言或肢体进行交流、利用符号或工具传递信息,并非是因为他们本身含有某种意义而是因为他们具有意向性。 文章主要分为三个部分来进行阐述： 第一章主要对意向性问题的历史路径进行了梳理,详尽的阐述了从古希腊朴素的意向性追问到塞尔意向性问题的提出,对意向性问题的基本发展脉络进行了完整的把握。 第二章是本文的重点,主要对塞尔言语行为中意向性问题的基本内容进行全面的分析,具体论述了塞尔意向性理论对前人的超越与确立,分析了塞尔言语行为与意向性的关联,从根本意义上对塞尔意向性问题进行把握。 第三章主要阐述了塞尔意向性问题的独特性与理论意义,具体包括集体意向性与社会实在、自然主义立场的意向性归属等,并对塞尔意向性问题存在的不足进行了分析,指出了塞尔意向性理论的价值意义所在。最后为结语。
[Abstract]:The exploration of intentionality has always been favored by many philosophers, especially by the philosophers of language analysis. Searle is a typical example: "the question of intentionality connects two of the most central issues in contemporary philosophy: first, 'how does language relate to reality' (a problem that all linguistic philosophers have dealt with in one way or another)? What is the nature of human behavior? What is an action to explain? Why can't natural science methods lead to such results in the study of human behavior as they have already succeeded elsewhere?' Both of these common questions converge on the conundrum of intent. "1 in Searle's view, intentionality is the premise of expressing a complete speech act, and the speaker conveys its meaning through the intentionality of the speech act, in other words, Intentionality is the skeleton which constitutes perfect speech and has deep relation with it. People communicate through language or body and use symbols or tools to convey information, not because they have some meaning, but because they have intention. The article is mainly divided into three parts to elaborate: the first chapter mainly combed the historical path of the problem of intentionality, elaborated from the simple intentionality of ancient Greece to the question of Searle's intentionality. The basic development of the intention of the problem of a complete grasp of the context. The second chapter is the focus of this paper, mainly analyzes the basic content of intentionality in Searle's speech act, discusses the transcendence and establishment of Searle's intentionality theory to predecessors, and analyzes the relation between Searle's speech act and intentionality. In a fundamental sense, the author grasps the problem of Searle's intentionality. The third chapter mainly expounds the uniqueness and theoretical significance of Searle's intentionality, including collective intentionality and social reality, intentionality attribution of naturalism and so on, and analyzes the shortcomings of Searle's intentionality. The value meaning of Searle's intentionality theory is pointed out. The last is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H0
本文编号：2160853
[Abstract]:The exploration of intentionality has always been favored by many philosophers, especially by the philosophers of language analysis. Searle is a typical example: "the question of intentionality connects two of the most central issues in contemporary philosophy: first, 'how does language relate to reality' (a problem that all linguistic philosophers have dealt with in one way or another)? What is the nature of human behavior? What is an action to explain? Why can't natural science methods lead to such results in the study of human behavior as they have already succeeded elsewhere?' Both of these common questions converge on the conundrum of intent. "1 in Searle's view, intentionality is the premise of expressing a complete speech act, and the speaker conveys its meaning through the intentionality of the speech act, in other words, Intentionality is the skeleton which constitutes perfect speech and has deep relation with it. People communicate through language or body and use symbols or tools to convey information, not because they have some meaning, but because they have intention. The article is mainly divided into three parts to elaborate: the first chapter mainly combed the historical path of the problem of intentionality, elaborated from the simple intentionality of ancient Greece to the question of Searle's intentionality. The basic development of the intention of the problem of a complete grasp of the context. The second chapter is the focus of this paper, mainly analyzes the basic content of intentionality in Searle's speech act, discusses the transcendence and establishment of Searle's intentionality theory to predecessors, and analyzes the relation between Searle's speech act and intentionality. In a fundamental sense, the author grasps the problem of Searle's intentionality. The third chapter mainly expounds the uniqueness and theoretical significance of Searle's intentionality, including collective intentionality and social reality, intentionality attribution of naturalism and so on, and analyzes the shortcomings of Searle's intentionality. The value meaning of Searle's intentionality theory is pointed out. The last is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 刘龙根;意向性与意义理解——从言语行为论的视角看[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2005年02期
2 刘高岑;语言哲学的心理意向性理论及其哲学意义[J];科学技术与辩证法;2004年04期
3 任蕊;;论意向性及言语行为理论发展的“瓶颈”[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年06期
4 邢起龙,曹云飞,邢思;略论塞尔的意向性理论[J];辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版);2004年06期
5 段开成;舍尔的意向性理论[J];西安外国语学院学报;2004年03期
6 刘龙根;言语行为意义观浅论[J];学习与探索;2003年02期
，本文编号：2160853
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2160853.html
