论取消会话含义的潜在可能与实际发生——兼驳“含义不可取消论”
发布时间：2018-11-23 15:33
【摘要】：含义不可取消论倚重对含义取消实际发生性的考察,认为执行意向的不可取消性导致含义不可取消,与经典格赖斯会话含义可取消论相悖。本文旨在阐明,以取消含义的潜在可能性为出发点,将含义取消后话语"无语义解码层面上的真值条件冲突"作为含义取消的基本标准,含义可取消性的有效性无以否论;同时,若以"无语用交际层面的意向冲突"作拓展标准,就可丰富含义取消的内涵,为含义在具体交际环境中能否成功取消提供参照。
[Abstract]:The theory of implicature cannot be cancelled relies on the investigation of the actual occurrence of implicature cancellation, and holds that the irrevocability of executive intention leads to the irrevocability of implicature, which is contrary to the classical Grice conversational implicature. The purpose of this paper is to clarify that with the potential possibility of cancelling meaning as the starting point, "the conflict of truth conditions at the level of non-semantic decoding" is regarded as the basic criterion of meaning cancellation, and the validity of the cancelability of meaning can not be discussed. At the same time, if the criterion of "intention conflict at the level of non-pragmatic communication" is extended, it can enrich the connotation of meaning cancellation and provide a reference for the successful cancellation of meaning in specific communication environment.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学外国语学院;电子科技大学外国语学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科基金项目“后格赖斯视阈下的语义学/语用学界面研究”(项目编号:10YJA740064) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助课题“后格赖斯含义理论研究”(项目编号:ZYGX2009J128)
【分类号】：H030
[Abstract]:The theory of implicature cannot be cancelled relies on the investigation of the actual occurrence of implicature cancellation, and holds that the irrevocability of executive intention leads to the irrevocability of implicature, which is contrary to the classical Grice conversational implicature. The purpose of this paper is to clarify that with the potential possibility of cancelling meaning as the starting point, "the conflict of truth conditions at the level of non-semantic decoding" is regarded as the basic criterion of meaning cancellation, and the validity of the cancelability of meaning can not be discussed. At the same time, if the criterion of "intention conflict at the level of non-pragmatic communication" is extended, it can enrich the connotation of meaning cancellation and provide a reference for the successful cancellation of meaning in specific communication environment.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学外国语学院;电子科技大学外国语学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科基金项目“后格赖斯视阈下的语义学/语用学界面研究”(项目编号:10YJA740064) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助课题“后格赖斯含义理论研究”(项目编号:ZYGX2009J128)
【分类号】：H030
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 张韧弦;;基于缺省逻辑的一般会话含义例证的形式处理[J];当代语言学;2008年02期
2 孙玉;;会话含义的可取消性再探[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2010年03期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 唐玉斌;;论非单调推理在日常思维中的应用[J];毕节学院学报;2011年03期
2 黄晨;高芸;;从缺省逻辑的视角看一般会话含义[J];江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年06期
3 王晓飞;;言者意向与含义取消性检验——后格赖斯语用学视角[J];天津外国语大学学报;2011年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 马悦;会话含义特征强化性的英汉对比研究[D];东北师范大学;2011年
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李定国;;释“匹”[J];语文知识;1996年12期
2 胡辉华;马克思的意识形态概念[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年06期
3 刘国锋;弗雷格逻辑预设理论评析[J];湖北社会科学;2002年08期
4 田科瑞;意识形态概念新探[J];理论与改革;2004年02期
5 黄s跸，
本文编号：2351919
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2351919.html
