当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 语言学论文 >

汉语小句中副词、动词及时量成分的组配考察

发布时间:2018-11-28 17:12
【摘要】:本文主要考察现代汉语小句中副词、动词及时量成分组配形成的句式A(VP+ADV+T)、句式B (ADV+VP+T)和句式C (T+ADV+VP),遵循形式与意义、描写与解释、综合与分析、定量统计与定性研究相结合的原则,以三个平面的语法理论为指导,借助现代语义学、认知语言学、功能语言学的理论成果,分析句式A、B、C在句法结构、语义内涵、语用色彩上的差异,探究制约句式A、B、C语序的规律,我们得出下面的结论:句式A、C是优势句式,句式B是劣势句式,信息焦点邻近原则和顺序象似性原则是制约句式语序的内在规律。为了进一步阐释三类句式,本文对副词“只”、“才”、“就”进入三类句式进行个案研究,从认知的角度描写“只”、“才”、“就”进入三类句式在语义和语用上存在的对称性与不对称性。本文包括以下九个章节: 第一章绪论。说明选题缘起、选题意义、研究现状、研究方法、语料来源等相关信息。 第二章从动词、副词、时量成分的类别出发,对进入句式A、B、C的组成元素进行系统的考察,考察的结论是:句式A、C较自由,受到较少条件的限制,句式B较不自由,受到较多条件的限制。 第三章从三个平面的语法理论出发,考察句式A、B、C在句法、语义、语用上的差异。 第四章考察句式A、B、C组成元素的位置关系,得出信息焦点邻近原则和顺序象似性原则是制约三类句式的内在规律。 第五章—第七章分别对副词“只”、“才”、“就”进入句式A、B、C的情况进行个案研究,考察句式中副词的语义指向,归纳分析各个副词进入三类句式形成的语用意义及形成成因。 第八章从认知的角度分析副词“只”、“才”、“就”进入句式A、B、C形成的句子在语义和语用上差异,发现它们在数量、时间、范围、逻辑、语气五个方面存在对称性和不对称性。 第九章结语。总结本文主体内容、研究的不足,并对对外汉语教学中需注意的问题进行了初步的探讨。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we mainly investigate the structure and meaning, description and interpretation, synthesis and analysis of adverbs in modern Chinese clauses, A (VP ADV T), sentence B (ADV VP T) and C (T ADV VP), which are formed by the combination of verb elements in time. On the principle of combining quantitative statistics with qualitative research and guided by three plane grammar theories, with the help of the theoretical achievements of modern semantics, cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics, this paper analyzes the syntactic structure and semantic connotations of sentence structure. The differences in pragmatic colors and the rules that restrict the word order of the sentence form A / B / C, we draw the following conclusions: the sentence pattern is the dominant sentence pattern, the sentence pattern B is the inferior sentence pattern, and the following conclusions are drawn: the sentence pattern is the dominant sentence pattern, and the sentence pattern B is the inferior sentence pattern. The principle of proximity of information focus and the principle of iconicity of sequence are the internal laws restricting the word order of sentence pattern. In order to further explain the three kinds of sentence patterns, this paper makes a case study of adverbs such as "only", "Cai" and "enters the three kinds of sentence patterns", and describes "only", "talent" from the perspective of cognition. The symmetries and asymmetries in semantics and pragmatics exist in the three types of sentence patterns. This article includes the following nine chapters: the first chapter is introduction. Explain the origin of the topic, the significance of the topic, research status, research methods, data sources and other relevant information. In the second chapter, starting from the categories of verbs, adverbs and time components, the author makes a systematic investigation of the elements that enter into the sentence form AZB C. The conclusion of the investigation is that the sentence form AHOC is freer, restricted by less conditions, and the sentence form B is less free. Be restricted by more conditions. The third chapter explores the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic differences of the sentence structure AZB BU C from the perspective of the three planes of grammar theory. In the fourth chapter, we investigate the position relationship of the elements of the sentence pattern, and draw the conclusion that the principle of information focus proximity and the principle of sequence iconicity are the internal laws that restrict the three kinds of sentence patterns. The fifth and seventh chapters make a case study of the adverbs "only", "Cai" and "on the situation of" entering into the sentence pattern AZB / C, respectively, and investigate the semantic direction of the adverbs in the sentence pattern. Induces and analyzes the pragmatic meaning and causes of formation of each adverb entering into three kinds of sentence patterns. Chapter eight analyzes the semantic and pragmatic differences of the sentences formed by the adverbs "only", "Cai" and "just" from the perspective of cognition, and finds out that they are different in number, time, scope and logic. There is symmetry and asymmetry in five aspects of mood. Chapter IX conclusion. This paper summarizes the main content of this paper, the shortcomings of the study, and the problems needing attention in teaching Chinese as a foreign language are preliminarily discussed.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H146

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 卢英顺;语言理解中的邻近性原则[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年04期

2 戴浩一;黄河;;时间顺序和汉语的语序[J];国外语言学;1988年01期

3 秦洪武;汉语“动词+时量短语”结构的情状类型和界性分析[J];当代语言学;2002年02期

4 陈立民;也说“就”和“才”[J];当代语言学;2005年01期

5 储泽祥;;肯定、否定与时量成分在动词前后的位置[J];汉语学报;2005年04期

6 邵敬敏;从“才”看语义与句法的相互制约关系[J];汉语学习;1997年03期

7 陈小荷;;主观量问题初探——兼谈副词“就”、“才”、“都”[J];世界汉语教学;1994年04期

8 沈家煊;;“有界”与“无界”[J];中国语文;1995年05期

9 邢福义;;小句中枢说[J];中国语文;1995年06期

10 陆俭明;现代汉语时间词说略[J];语言教学与研究;1991年01期



本文编号:2363648

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2363648.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户133d6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com