双及物结构的构式语法研究

发布时间：2021-02-08 19:43

　　双及物结构一直是语言学研究的焦点,前人对双及物结构的研究大致可以分为三类:结构主义,转换生成语法和认知语言学,但是均有缺点和不足之处。本文的研究是基于Goldberg的构式语法理论,试图更合理的解释双及物结构。根据构式语法对构式的定义,本文认为双及物结构有着自己独特的语法结构NP+V+NP1+NP2和典型的意义“施事将受事成功的转移给接受者”。同时对双及物结构的论元的特征进行了讨论,发现典型的施事和接受者均为生命体,也可以是非生命体的。同时也发现有些双及动词具有典型的意义,例如:“give”,还有其他种类动词虽然不具有典型意义,但也蕴含“给予”的意义,例如“allow, leave”本文把这些具有非典型意义的动词分为五类,分别是表示创造/获得类动词、表示承担义务类动词、表示将来拥有类和允许类动词以往对双结构的结构的研究都注重对双及物动词的分类,本人主要侧重于通过隐喻机制来研究双及物结构的扩展。典型的宾语,也就是语义上的受事,通常是表示具体物体的名词词组,通过隐喻,宾语不仅可以是表示具体的物体的名词词组,还可以是抽象的物体或言语有关物体的词组。由于隐喻的作用,我们把这些作为受事的名词词组... 

【文章来源】：江西师范大学江西省

【文章页数】：70 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
英文摘要
中文摘要
Content
Chapter one Introduction
    1.1 Definition of the ditransitive construction
    1.2 Objectives of the thesis
    1.3 The organization of the thesis
Chapter two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Previous Research
        2.2.1 The structural approach to the ditransitive construction
        2.2.2 The transformational approach to the ditransitive construction
        2.2.3 The cognitive approach to the ditransitive construction
    2.3 Summary
Chapter three Theoretical Framework Construction Grammar
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Construction Gammar
        3.2.1 Constructions: what they are
        3.2.2 The characteristics of CG
        3.2.3 The matches between verbs and construction
        3.2.4 Advantages of the Construction Grammar
    3.3 Summary
Chapter four CG approach to the Ditransitive Construction
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 The existence of the ditransitive construction
        4.2.1 Grammatical representation of the ditransitive construction
        4.2.2 Semantic representation of the ditransitive construction
        4.2.3 Semantic constraints of its arguments
            4.2.3.1 Semantic constraint on the agent
            4.2.3.2 Semantic constraint on the recipient
    4.3 Ditransitive construction as prototype category
        4.3.1 Representation of the prototype of the ditransitive construction
        4.3.2 Polysemous interpretation
    4.4 The extensions of the ditransitive construction
        4.4.1 Metaphor: the patient as information
        4.4.2 Metaphor: the patient as fact/ assumption
        4.4.3 Metaphor: the patient as perception
        4.4.4 Metaphor: the patient as action
        4.4.5 Metaphor: an exceptional one
    4.5 Reclassification of the ditransitive construction
    4.6 Summary
Chapter five Conclusion
    5.1 Summary of the thesis
    5.2 Theoretical implications
    5.3 Remaining problems and limitations
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
在读期间公开发表论文（著）及科研情况等



本文编号：3024434