翻译的修辞符号视角研究

发布时间：2021-04-08 02:22

　　人文科学的历史和社会科学的历史总是伴随着历史原始资料的融合:同样的观点贡献于不同的视角。另一方面,新视角又以历史为依据,汲取其最初的原动力赖以萌芽并茁壮成长,由此而催生跨学科领域的变革。翻译就是把一种语言承载的信息用另一种语言表达出来。现代语言学为翻译和翻译活动提供了比较科学的理论基础。但是,目前大量的翻译研究都将翻译纳入语言学的范畴内,聚焦于语音学、形态学和句法学的层面。基于此,我们构建了翻译的修辞符号学视角研究,以打破翻译研究的这一局限性,并论证了其作为一个崭新的突破性的方法在解释长期以来关于翻译等效、直译与意译、归化与异化的争论中的优越性,阐明了修辞符号意义在翻译中的传递。在本文中,我们提出修辞符号学的概念,并在此基础上构建修辞符号学理论。修辞符号学是基于符号学原理及方法的修辞研究,旨在运用符号学原理和方法来研究语言修辞,即研究语言符号的意义功能及特性;语言符号在交际修辞中的编码和解码定律;语言修辞的符号美学特性及规则;以及各种修辞手段的功能及编码技巧。我们之所以尝试从修辞符号学视角探讨翻译研究,主要有以下理论依据。首先是翻译的修辞性。译者的修辞处境是显而易见的。翻译绝非单纯的科... 

【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：210 页

【学位级别】：博士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
List of Figures and Tables
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Origin and Rationale for the Present Study
    1.2 Definitions of Key Terms
    1.3 Objectives of the Research
    1.4 Methodology
    1.5 Organization of the Dissertation
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 About Translation Studies
        2.1.1 Definition and Development of Translation Studies
        2.1 2 Integrated and Interdisciplinary Approaches to Translation Studies
            2.1.2.1 Integrated Approaches to Translation Studies
            2.1.2.2 Interdisciplinary Approaches to Translation Studies
        2.1.3 Non-western Traditions in Translation Studies
        2.1.4 New Trends
    2.2 Issues and Debates in Translation Studies
        2.2.1 Equivalence
            2.2.1.1 Nida’s Concept of Formal Equivalence
            2.2.1.2 Nida’s Concept of Dynamic Equivalence
            2.2.1.3 Other Concepts of Equivalence
            2.2.1.4 Summary
        2.2.2 Context in Translating
            2.2.2.1 Register analysis
                2.2.2.1.1 Field of Discourse
                2.2.2.1.2 Mode of Discourse
                2.2.2.1.3 Tenor of Discourse
            2.2.2.2 Context and Translation
            2.2.2.3 Summary
        2.2.3 The Translator’s Role
            2.2.3.1 The Translating Process
            2.2.3.2 Translatability and Untranslatability
            2.2.3.3 Foreignization and Domestication
            2.2.3.4 Summary
Chapter Three Toward a Rhetorical-Semiotic Approach in Translation Studies
    3.1 Key Concepts in Semiotics
        3.1.1 The Meaning of Signs
        3.1.2 Semiotics
            3.1.2.1 De Saussure’s Sign System
            3.1.2.2 Peircean Signification System
            3.1.2.3 Roland Barthes’Notion
        3.1.3 Semiotic Science
            3.1.3.1 Logical Semiotics
            3.1.3.2 Linguistics as a Branch of Semiotics
            3.1.3.3 Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics
            3.1.3.4 Semiotics of Texts
    3.2 Semiotic Approach Toward Rhetoric
        3.2.1 The Revival and Development of Western Rhetoric
        3.2.2 Peirce’s Rhetorical Turn
        3.2.3 Semiotic Approach toward Rhetoric
    3.3 Toward a Rhetorical-Semiotic Approach in Translation Studies
        3.3.1 Translation and Semiotics
        3.3.2 Rhetorical Translation Studies
        3.3.3 The Translating of Meaning
        3.3.4 Message Decoding and Encoding—the Process of Translation
            3.3.4.1 Context
            3.3.4.2 Code
            3.3.4.3 Decoding and Encoding
    3.4 Summary
Chapter Four Rhetorical Encoding of Linguistic Signs
    4.1 Communication, Linguistic Expressions and Rhetoric Encoding of Linguistic Signs
        4.1.1 Characteristics of Communicative Activities
        4.1.2 Definition of Rhetorical Encoding
        4.1.3 Guidelines of Rhetorical Encoding
            4.1.3.1 Conventions
            4.1.3.2 Logic
            4.1.3.3 Appropriateness
            4.1.3.4 Pragmatic Purposes
    4.2 Classification of Rhetorical Encoding
        4.2.1 Logic Encoding of Linguistic Signs
            4.2.1.1 The Category of Logic Signs
            4.2.1.2 Basic Function of Logic Rhetoric
            4.2.1.3 Meticulous, Compact and Intact Quality
            4.2.1.4 Denotative and Monosemantic Referential Meaning
            4.2.1.5 Objective, Reasoning and ‘Hot’Messages
        4.2.2 Aesthetic Encoding of Linguistic Signs
            4.2.2.1 Expressive Aesthetic Signs
            4.2.2.2 Aesthetic and Emotional Functions
            4.2.2.3 Flexible and Open Quality
            4.2.2.4 Connotative Semantic Reference
            4.2.2.5 Subjective, Emotional and ‘Cold’Messages
        4.2.3 Semantic Rhetorical Encoding and Rhetorical Encoding of Linguistic Form
            4.2.3.1 Thoughts and Emotions
            4.2.3.2 Linguistic Images
    4.3 Summary
Chapter Five Rhetorical Decoding of Linguistic Signs
    5.1 Definition of Rhetorical Decoding
    5.2 The Capabilities Required of Rhetorical Decoding of Linguistic Signs
        5.2.1 A Thorough Knowledge of the Linguistic Sign System
        5.2.2 Strong Capability of Logic Thinking and Reasoning
        5.2.3 Strong Image Thinking Ability Such as Association and Imagination
        5.2.4 Being Rhetorically and Artistically Accomplished
        5.2.5 Correspondent Cognitive Abilities, Intellectual Level and Emotional Experience
    5.3 Classification of Rhetorical Decoding
        5.3.1 Logic Decoding of Linguistic Signs
            5.3.1.1 Literal Logic Decoding of Linguistic Signs
            5.3.1.2 Free Logic Decoding of Linguistic Signs
        5.3.2 Aesthetic Decoding of Linguistic Signs
            5.3.2.1 Semantic Interpretation
            5.3.2.2 Image Aesthetic Appreciation
                5.3.2.2.1 Perception of Linguistic Signs
                5.3.2.2.2 Semantic Understanding
                5.3.2.2.3 Imagination of Linguistic Images
                5.3.2.2.4 Association and Intertextuality
                5.3.2.2.5 Emotional Experience
    5.4 Summary
Chapter Six The Retaining of Meaning in Translation from Rhetorical-Semiotic Perspective
    6.1 The Integration of Rhetorical Semiotics and Translation Studies
        6.1.1 The Feasibility of Applying Rhetorical Theory to Translation Studies
        6.1.2 The Construction of a Dynamic Meaning Theory of Translation
        6.1.3 The Retaining of Meaning in Translation from Rhetorical-Semiotic Perspective
        6.1.4 Summary
    6.2 The Transfer of Meaning
        6.2.1 The Transfer of Linguistic Meaning
            6.2.1.1 Orthographic and Phonological Barriers
            6.2.1.2 Grammatical Barriers
            6.2.1.3 Barriers of Figures of Speech
        6.2.2 The Transfer of Referential Meaning
        6.2.3 The Transfer of Pragmatic Meaning
            6.2.3.1 Cultural Words and Expressions
            6.2.3.2 Idioms
            6.2.3.3 Figures of Speech
            6.2.3.4 The Reproduction of Register and Other Codes in Translation
Chapter Seven Conclusions and Implications
    7.1 Major Findings and Contributions of the Study
    7.2 Limitations of the Study
    7.3 Areas for Further Research
Bibliography


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]口译中克服文化障碍的符号学视角[J]. 钟再强.  南通大学学报(社会科学版). 2007(01)
[2]从符号学角度看翻译中的语言视差[J]. 关德英.  宿州教育学院学报. 2006(06)
[3]从对意义认识之嬗变看翻译研究之发展[J]. 林克难.  四川外语学院学报. 2006(01)
[4]再谈意义与翻译[J]. 王东风.  中国外语. 2005(01)
[5]关于建构的翻译学之构想[J]. 吕俊.  中国外语. 2004(02)
[6]语言哲学与当代西方修辞学[J]. 彭炫,温科学.  外语教学. 2004(02)
[7]语用视野下的翻译[J]. 薛雁,戴炜华.  外语与外语教学. 2003(11)
[8]翻译也是解码的过程——兼评《〈翻译研究的综合方法〉述评》[J]. 韩晓方,温美昕.  井冈山师范学院学报. 2003(04)
[9]从社会符号学翻译法看汉语成语英译过程中的功能对等[J]. 衡孝军.  中国翻译. 2003(04)
[10]普遍语用学的翻译观——一种交往理论的翻译观[J]. 吕俊.  外语与外语教学. 2003(07)



本文编号：3124659