中国刑事庭审祈使句语用功能及其语调表征

发布时间：2025-03-19 22:26

　　经过近四十年的法律语言学理论的引进与发展,我国庭审话语不仅受到了语言学界的高度重视,也愈加受到法学界的广泛关注。近年来,除热门话题如预设、打断、标记语、模糊语等方面的静态文本研究外,学界也开始转向侧重庭审话语的动态性研究。因此,为补充及丰富庭审话语的研究内容,本文引入广义的汉语普通话语调为研究方法,全面考察和探析庭审话语中祈使句的语用功能及其语调表征,以求深化对祈使句的传统认识,并为庭审话语研究提供新的视角。在焦点理论和语用身份论的架构下,本文以央视CCTV12《庭审现场》栏目的审判视频转写文本为语料,随机选取了刑事案件审判中的488句祈使句,并运用Praat语音分析软件对其语用功能进行有声性特质的实证研究。研究表明:(1)祈使句的焦点类型与其要表达的语用功能密切相关。就法官而言,其祈使句的语用功能由调核的位置与祈使句主语是否一致触发,可以分为强调功能和提醒功能,且受到程序性原则、经济性原则、礼貌性原则和明确性原则的制约;就公诉人而言,其祈使句的语用功能的实现主要受到语用目的的影响,表现为强调功能,提醒功能和警告功能;就辩护人而言,其祈使句的语用功能由调核与祈使表述焦点位置是否一致触发,...

【文章页数】：60 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Significance
    1.3 Research Objective and Research Questions
    1.4 Methodology
        1.4.1 Data Collection
        1.4.2 Research Instrument
        1.4.3 Research Procedure
    1.5 Organization
2 Literature Review
    2.1 Previous Studies on Forensic Linguistics
        2.1.1 Overseas Studies on Forensic Linguistics
        2.1.2 Domestic Studies on Forensic Linguistics
        2.1.3 Limitations of Forensic Linguistics Research
    2.2 Previous Studies on Chinese Imperative Sentence
        2.2.1 Definition Studies on Imperative Sentence
        2.2.2 Constituent Studies on Imperative Sentence
        2.2.3 Pragmatic Studies on Imperative Sentence
        2.2.4 Limitations of Imperative Sentence Research
    2.3 Previous Studies on Intonation
        2.3.1 Overseas Studies on Intonation
        2.3.2 Domestic Studies on Intonation
        2.3.3 Limitations of Intonation Research
3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Focus Theory and Intonation Approach
    3.2 Pragmatic Identity Theory
        3.2.1 Definition of Pragmatic Identity
        3.2.2 Dynamic Choice of Pragmatic Identity
        3.2.3 Discursive Construction of Pragmatic Identity
    3.3 Overall Theoretical Framework
4 Pragmatic Functions of Imperative Sentence
    4.1 Research Results
    4.2 Pragmatic Functions of Judge’s Imperative Sentence
        4.2.1 Emphasizing Function
            4.2.1.1 Emphasizing Order
            4.2.1.2 Emphasizing Identity
            4.2.1.3 Emphasizing Duty
            4.2.1.4 Emphasizing Information
        4.2.2 Reminding Function
    4.3 Pragmatic Functions of Prosecutor’s Imperative Sentence
        4.3.1 Emphasizing Function
        4.3.2 Reminding Function
        4.3.3 Warning Function
    4.4 Pragmatic Functions of Defender’s Imperative Sentence
        4.4.1 Requesting Function
        4.4.2 Suggesting Function
        4.4.3 Asking Function
    4.5 Brief Summary
5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Limitations and Suggestions
References
Appendix 1 Basic Information of the 28 Cases
Appendix 2 Transcription Convention
攻读硕士学位期间发表学术论文情况
Acknowledgement



本文编号：4036946