翻译学本质叩问——文化派对归结论的误读

发布时间：2018-01-06 22:25

本文关键词：翻译学本质叩问——文化派对归结论的误读　出处：《外语研究》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在翻译学发生文化转向之后,文化派译论在近几十年内占据了翻译话语体系的中心位置。然而,其译论存在学理上的缺陷,具有很大的误导作用。归结论的提出旨在解决其一系列的偏颇,力图将翻译研究拉回正轨。归结论的反思、批评与建构自然欢迎反证,但是浏览一些反批评文章,不难发现所谓的反论实际上是误读了归结论,在翻译的本体论、方法论及目的论诸方面缺少本质的把握。本文以具体的例子来论证文化派对归结论在这几个方面的误读,以使翻译学回归正确的学科取向。
[Abstract]:After the cultural turn in translation studies, cultural school translation theory has occupied the central position of translation discourse system in recent decades. However, its translation theory has some theoretical defects. The purpose of the conclusion is to solve a series of biases and try to bring the translation study back on track. The reflection, criticism and construction of the conclusion naturally welcome the counter-proof. However, it is not difficult to find out that the so-called counter theory is actually misreading the conclusion of the translation in the ontology of translation. The methodology and Skopos theory lack a grasp of the essence. This paper uses concrete examples to demonstrate the misreading of the cultural party conclusion in order to make the translation study return to the correct discipline orientation.
【作者单位】：天津外国语大学外国语言文学文化研究中心;天津外国语大学研究生院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“《诗经》英译译本分析研究”(编号:13BYY031)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：H059
【正文快照】：

【参考文献】