投入量假设理论的局限与完善

发布时间：2018-01-11 15:11

本文关键词：投入量假设理论的局限与完善　出处：《现代外语》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：投入量假设理论界定了认知投入的量化指标,为任务设计提供了衡量标准,但是学界对此存在不少分歧。本文认为分歧的原因在于该理论存在四个方面的局限性:1)其逻辑起点是从语义出发,忽视了词汇发展的过程;2)适用范围不够宽泛,不适用于除语义外其他知识的加工,不利于接受性词汇习得;3)实施的前提偏理想化,忽视了影响加工资源配置的内、外部因素;4)定义欠准确,分级简单化,指标权重赋值不科学。在对这四点不足分析的基础上,本文对完善该理论提出了建议。
[Abstract]:The quantitative index of cognitive input is determined by the theory of involvement load hypothesis, which provides the criterion for task design. However, there are a lot of differences in academic circles. The reason of the differences lies in the limitations of the theory in four aspects: 1) its logical starting point is from the semantic point of view, ignoring the process of lexical development; 2) the scope of application is not broad enough, and it is not suitable for the processing of other knowledge except semantics, which is not conducive to the acquisition of receptive vocabulary; 3) the implementation of the premise is idealized, ignoring the internal and external factors that affect the allocation of processing resources; 4) the definition is inaccurate, the classification is simple, the index weight assignment is not scientific. On the basis of the analysis of these four points, this paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the theory.
【作者单位】：浙江财经大学;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“二语话语域中词块搭配性链接特征研究”(13YJA740075)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：H09
【正文快照】： 1.引言LauferHulstijn(2001)提出的投入量假设在词汇加工研究领域颇具影响。其基本思想是不同的任务促使学习者对词汇进行不同程度的认知加工,从而习得效果不同;认知加工程度用投入量来表示,用需求、搜寻和评估三指标来衡量;投入量越大的加工任务越有助于词汇附带习得。投入

【参考文献】