汉语“什么”类代词疑问义、存在义和全称义的中介语句法实现研究

发布时间：2018-07-12 08:18

本文选题：对外汉语 + 中介语　；参考：《语言教学与研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：汉语中的"什么"类代词可以表达疑问义、存在义和全称义,而后者则因其与"都"字的位序不同而区分为左向全称量化义和右向全称量化义。基于跨语言对比和二语习得理论的实证调查显示,"什么"类代词的不同指称义在中介语语法中的句法实现程度并不相同:1)疑问义句式无习得障碍,但存在义句式的习得受制于否定范畴的影响;2)左向全称量化义句式的中介语表现可归因于习得者母语的类型学特征;3)右向全称量化涉及到多种语义,因而其句法实现很难被俄语组习得,但日语组凭借其母语语法中的词汇化机制,表现接近本族语组。文章据此提出中介语整合能力缺损假设:成人二语者缺乏整合分布性异质线索的语言协调能力。
[Abstract]:The "what" pronouns in Chinese can express interrogative meaning, existential meaning and full name meaning, while the latter can be divided into left full name quantization meaning and right full name quantization meaning because of their different order from "du" word. An empirical investigation based on cross-linguistic contrast and second language acquisition theory shows that the different referential meanings of "what" pronouns have different degree of syntactic realization in interlanguage grammar. However, the acquisition of existential sentence patterns is subject to the influence of negative categories. 2) the interlanguage representation of left full name quantification can be attributed to the typological characteristics of the learner's mother tongue. 3) right full name quantization involves a variety of semantics. Therefore, its syntactic realization is difficult to be acquired by the Russian group, but the Japanese group is close to the native group because of the lexicalization mechanism in its native language grammar. According to this hypothesis, the adult second language learners lack the language coordination ability of integrating and distributing heterogeneity cues.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“汉语特色句式的优化生成及其中介语加工机制研究”(15BYY090)
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】