语料库视野下的现代汉语心理动作义场代表词义项分布研究
发布时间：2018-07-13 20:48
【摘要】：20世纪80年代以来语料库技术发展越来越成熟,这也为大规模地抽取言语样本从而进行有效的定量分析奠定了基础。使得词典的编纂一改传统内省枚举方式,从而使得定量与定性分析结合成为了可能,为辞书编纂的科学性、系统系、精确性提供了提升的空间。本文就语料库技术如何应用于词典编纂特别是如何运用语料库技术进行义项的分布情况研究进行探讨。语料库技术的出现提供了更具现代性的科学定量分析手段,为传统定性分析注入新的活力,对于词典编纂问题而言其活力主要体现在分析的全面性、数据的系统性、义项界定的准确性。论文选择“虑”、“患”、“怕”、“思”、“觉”这五个心理动作义场代表词作为研究对象,结合语料库技术在保证最大效度占有材料的基础上对五个心理动作义场代表词的义项分布情况做了较为全面的探讨。《现代汉语词典》(第7版,下文简称《现汉》)是汉语类中型语文词典中最具代表性的词典,《现汉》发行量大,使用者多,规范性强,因此我们在语料库视野下进行现代汉语词语义项分布研究的时候以《现汉》已有义项作为最主要的参考。词典编纂方面的定性分析与定量分析相结合是理论与大数据的结合:一方面语料库为我们词典编纂的研究提供充足的大数据,另一方面认知语言学、词汇学、语义学、词典学等相关学科知识为词典编纂研究中的定性分析提供理论支撑,增加定性分析的科学性与客观性。本文以《现汉》已有义项作为参考,运用语料库技术结合相关理论知识做定性定量相结合的分析,对心理动作义场中的五个代表词的义项分布情况进行研究以便为将来《现汉》上述五个词的修订提供些许参考。本文分为三个部分:绪论、正文、结语。绪论对国内外认知语言学的发展阶段、研究内容、研究方法、适用主题范围进行了综述总结,并对认知语言学在词典编纂特别是词典释义方面的应用作出初步探讨。通过对国内外认知语言学进行仔细梳理,以期为词典编纂时义项释义提供更为坚实的理论解释与支撑。第一章至第五章为正文。以心理动作义场的五个代表词“虑”、“患”、“怕”“思”、“觉”作为研究的对象。通过对五个代表词所建语料的分析并参考相关理论,发现“虑”字漏收两个义项;“患”字应新增五个义项;“怕”字少收了四个义项;“思”字漏收三个义项;“觉”字则少收三个义项。面对这些代表词义项上的缺漏,我们在大数据语料分析的基础上参考认知语言学、词汇学、语义学、词典学等相关理论,提出了补录修改的建议。结语对心理动作语义场五个代表词的义项分布情况的进行了总结,并回顾了全文的创新与不足。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, the development of corpus technology has become more and more mature, which has laid a foundation for the large-scale sampling of speech samples to carry out effective quantitative analysis. It makes the compilation of dictionaries change the traditional introspection enumeration method, which makes it possible to combine quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, and provides a space for improving the scientific, systematic and accurate compilation of dictionaries. This paper discusses how to apply corpus technology to lexicography, especially how to use corpus technology to study the distribution of meanings. The emergence of corpus technology provides a more modern means of scientific quantitative analysis, which infuses new vitality into traditional qualitative analysis. For lexicography, its vitality is mainly reflected in the comprehensiveness of analysis and the systematization of data. The accuracy of the definition of meaning. The thesis chooses five representative words of mental action meaning field, such as "worry", "suffering", "fear", "thought" and "awareness", as the object of study. Based on the corpus technology, the distribution of the meanings of the five representative words in the mental action field is discussed in detail on the basis of ensuring the maximum validity of the materials. The Modern Chinese Dictionary (7th Edition, the third edition of the Chinese Dictionary of Modern Chinese) is used to analyze the meaning distribution of the five representative words in the mental action field. The following is referred to as "Xianhan"), which is the most representative dictionary in medium-sized Chinese dictionaries. It has a large circulation, a large number of users, and strong standardization Therefore, when we study the meaning distribution of modern Chinese words from the perspective of corpus, we take the existing meanings as the main reference. The combination of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis in lexicography is the combination of theory and big data: on the one hand, the corpus provides sufficient big data for the study of lexicography, on the other hand, cognitive linguistics, lexicology, semantics, etc. The knowledge of lexicography and other related disciplines provides theoretical support for qualitative analysis in dictionary compilation and increases the scientific and objective nature of qualitative analysis. In this paper, the existing meanings of "present Han" are taken as reference, and the qualitative and quantitative analysis is made by using corpus technology combined with relevant theoretical knowledge. This paper studies the meaning distribution of the five representative words in the field of mental action meaning in order to provide some reference for the revision of the five words mentioned above in the future. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text, conclusion. The introduction summarizes the development stage, research contents, research methods and applicable subject areas of cognitive linguistics at home and abroad, and makes a preliminary discussion on the application of cognitive linguistics in lexicography, especially in the interpretation of dictionaries. In this paper, cognitive linguistics at home and abroad is carefully combed in order to provide a more solid theoretical explanation and support for the meaning interpretation in lexicography. Chapters I to V are the main body. The five representative words of psychological action field are "worry", "suffering", "fear", "thought" and "sense" as the object of study. By analyzing the data of the five representative words and referring to the relevant theories, it is found that the word "worry" contains two meanings, the word "suffering" should add five meanings, the word "fear" contains four meanings less, the word "think" contains three meanings. The word "Chueh" is less than three meanings. In the face of the gaps in these representative terms, we refer to the relevant theories of cognitive linguistics, lexicology, semantics and lexicography on the basis of big data corpus analysis, and put forward some suggestions for supplementary revision. The conclusion summarizes the meaning distribution of the five representative words in the semantic field of psychological action, and reviews the innovation and deficiency of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, the development of corpus technology has become more and more mature, which has laid a foundation for the large-scale sampling of speech samples to carry out effective quantitative analysis. It makes the compilation of dictionaries change the traditional introspection enumeration method, which makes it possible to combine quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, and provides a space for improving the scientific, systematic and accurate compilation of dictionaries. This paper discusses how to apply corpus technology to lexicography, especially how to use corpus technology to study the distribution of meanings. The emergence of corpus technology provides a more modern means of scientific quantitative analysis, which infuses new vitality into traditional qualitative analysis. For lexicography, its vitality is mainly reflected in the comprehensiveness of analysis and the systematization of data. The accuracy of the definition of meaning. The thesis chooses five representative words of mental action meaning field, such as "worry", "suffering", "fear", "thought" and "awareness", as the object of study. Based on the corpus technology, the distribution of the meanings of the five representative words in the mental action field is discussed in detail on the basis of ensuring the maximum validity of the materials. The Modern Chinese Dictionary (7th Edition, the third edition of the Chinese Dictionary of Modern Chinese) is used to analyze the meaning distribution of the five representative words in the mental action field. The following is referred to as "Xianhan"), which is the most representative dictionary in medium-sized Chinese dictionaries. It has a large circulation, a large number of users, and strong standardization Therefore, when we study the meaning distribution of modern Chinese words from the perspective of corpus, we take the existing meanings as the main reference. The combination of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis in lexicography is the combination of theory and big data: on the one hand, the corpus provides sufficient big data for the study of lexicography, on the other hand, cognitive linguistics, lexicology, semantics, etc. The knowledge of lexicography and other related disciplines provides theoretical support for qualitative analysis in dictionary compilation and increases the scientific and objective nature of qualitative analysis. In this paper, the existing meanings of "present Han" are taken as reference, and the qualitative and quantitative analysis is made by using corpus technology combined with relevant theoretical knowledge. This paper studies the meaning distribution of the five representative words in the field of mental action meaning in order to provide some reference for the revision of the five words mentioned above in the future. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text, conclusion. The introduction summarizes the development stage, research contents, research methods and applicable subject areas of cognitive linguistics at home and abroad, and makes a preliminary discussion on the application of cognitive linguistics in lexicography, especially in the interpretation of dictionaries. In this paper, cognitive linguistics at home and abroad is carefully combed in order to provide a more solid theoretical explanation and support for the meaning interpretation in lexicography. Chapters I to V are the main body. The five representative words of psychological action field are "worry", "suffering", "fear", "thought" and "sense" as the object of study. By analyzing the data of the five representative words and referring to the relevant theories, it is found that the word "worry" contains two meanings, the word "suffering" should add five meanings, the word "fear" contains four meanings less, the word "think" contains three meanings. The word "Chueh" is less than three meanings. In the face of the gaps in these representative terms, we refer to the relevant theories of cognitive linguistics, lexicology, semantics and lexicography on the basis of big data corpus analysis, and put forward some suggestions for supplementary revision. The conclusion summarizes the meaning distribution of the five representative words in the semantic field of psychological action, and reviews the innovation and deficiency of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李仕春;;语料库视野下的现代汉语“绿”字义项分布研究[J];山西大同大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期
2 王寅;;新认知语用学——语言的认知-社会研究取向[J];外语与外语教学;2013年01期
3 胡丽珍;;语料库视野下汉语大型辞书的常用动词释义——基于“啃”的个案研究[J];辞书研究;2013年01期
4 王寅;;认知构式语法[J];外语学刊;2011年02期
5 刘玉梅;;Goldberg认知构式语法的基本观点——反思与前瞻[J];现代外语;2010年02期
6 张辉;周红英;;认知语言学的新发展——认知社会语言学——兼评Kristiansen & Dirven(2008)的《认知社会语言学》[J];外语学刊;2010年03期
7 蔡金亭;朱立霞;;认知语言学角度的二语习得研究:观点、现状与展望[J];外语研究;2010年01期
8 张绍全;;词义演变的动因与认知机制[J];外语学刊;2010年01期
9 束定芳;;中国认知语言学二十年——回顾与反思[J];现代外语;2009年03期
10 黄月华;左双菊;;原型范畴与家族相似性范畴——兼谈原型理论在认知语言学中引发的争议[J];语文研究;2009年03期
相关博士学位论文 前7条
1 蒋向勇;现代汉语缩略语的认知研究[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
2 李云彤;认知语言学视域下的汉语多义词研究[D];吉林大学;2013年
3 李宇宏;现代汉语多义词词义引申认知研究[D];中央民族大学;2010年
4 张再红;词汇文化语义的认知研究[D];华中科技大学;2009年
5 朱晓军;空间范畴的认知语义研究[D];华东师范大学;2008年
6 王小潞;汉语隐喻认知的神经机制研究[D];浙江大学;2007年
7 陈家旭;英汉隐喻认知对比研究[D];华东师范大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 史梁j，
本文编号：2120696
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2120696.html
