“引发”类动词的多角度研究
[Abstract]:Focusing on the clustering of meanings, this paper focuses on the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic characteristics of the five disyllabic verbs. The investigation of syntactic plane mainly includes two aspects: class join and high frequency collocation. From the point of view of class connection, the generality of "induced" verbs is greater than that of individuality. The "induced" verbs are mainly used as predicates in sentences, with nominal objects, verb objects and adjective objects. "cause", "cause" can take subject-predicate structure. "cause" and "produce" can lead to the verb "out, come out". From the perspective of high frequency collocation, the characteristics of "induced" verbs are greater than those of common ones, especially in the choice of prepositions and objects. In the semantic plane, first of all, with the help of the lexical analysis model, according to what "from scratch to exist", the verbs of "initiation" are divided into two groups: "cause, cause" and "produce, occur". The first group expresses "make." In terms of semantic features, the main differences of internal members are "the strength and weakness of causality", "emphasis on causality" and "semantic characteristics of object". The second group expresses the appearance of abstract things and relationships from scratch, and the distinguishing semantic feature is that "production" has [by virtue of] [product], but "occurrence" does not have these conditions. Finally, from the perspective of construction of morpheme, the influence of morpheme meaning and word formation on word meaning and collocation is analyzed. The study of pragmatic plane is mainly based on the BCC corpus and the self-built small corpus, focusing on the frequency differences of the five verbs and the differences in their use in different language styles. On the one hand, it verifies the reliability of the conclusion of syntactic investigation, on the other hand, it also refines, complements the differences in the dynamic use of the five verbs.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H146.3;H136
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 荀恩东;饶高琦;肖晓悦;臧娇娇;;大数据背景下BCC语料库的研制[J];语料库语言学;2016年01期
2 任鹰;;从生成整体论的角度看语言结构的生成与分析——主要以汉语动宾结构为例[J];当代语言学;2016年01期
3 崔璨;袁毓林;;“胜败”类动词的及物性类型分析[J];语言教学与研究;2015年05期
4 荀恩东;饶高琦;谢佳莉;黄志娥;;现代汉语词汇历时检索系统的建设与应用[J];中文信息学报;2015年03期
5 骆健飞;;韵律、语体、语法:汉语动词辨析及教学的新视角[J];云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版);2015年01期
6 刘宝霞;张美兰;;“迎接”义动词的历时演变和地域分布[J];语文研究;2014年03期
7 蔡淑美;施春宏;;基于汉语中介语语料库的二价名词习得研究[J];语言文字应用;2014年02期
8 熊苇渡;;存现句的句法语义及认知分析——以“发生”句为例[J];社会科学论坛;2013年06期
9 张伯江;;以语法解释为目的的语体研究[J];当代修辞学;2012年06期
10 沈家煊;;“名动词”的反思:问题和对策[J];世界汉语教学;2012年01期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 金多荣;基于语料库的汉韩“获得类”动词动宾搭配研究[D];山东大学;2014年
2 王晓庆;现代汉语单音节制作义动词研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
3 李秋杨;汉英思考类动词语义的多角度考察[D];中央民族大学;2010年
4 申修瑛;现代汉语词语搭配研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 汤益飞;基于语料库的英汉“导致”类动词的语义韵对比研究[D];浙江财经大学;2015年
2 孙军岩;现代汉语打击类动词研究[D];湖南大学;2012年
3 李燕;汉韩放置类动词配价对比研究[D];延边大学;2009年
4 杨岩勇;基于语料库的同义词辨析[D];暨南大学;2007年
5 杜诚忠;现代汉语饮食类动词研究[D];南京师范大学;2006年
6 朱坤林;现代汉语“猜测”类动词的多角度分析[D];延边大学;2006年
7 闫春慧;汉语“洗涤”类动词语义场的历史演变[D];内蒙古大学;2006年
8 刘新春;睡觉类动词的历史演变研究[D];河南大学;2003年
,本文编号:2298565
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2298565.html