索绪尔语言学思想与博社恩语言学理论的比对
发布时间：2018-11-09 20:50
【摘要】：在语言学界,索绪尔历来被公认为“现代语言学之父”,但其实早在索绪尔之前,波兰—俄国语言学家博杜恩就已经提出了普通语言学理论的核心观点。通过对博杜恩普通语言学思想的整理和解读,我们发现博杜恩与索绪尔的语言学理论存在众多相似处,博杜恩在普通语言学思想方面更具有先见性。这让我们不得不对索绪尔语言学思想的原创性产生质疑,并对他的语言学贡献以及其在语言学史上的地位进行重新审视。本研究主要参考《普通语言学教程》(高名凯译)、《普通语言学手稿》(于秀英整理)以及《普通语言学论文集》(杨衍春译),并对索绪尔与博杜恩的语言学思想进行整理和比对,重在揭示二者语言学理论上的相似性。从比对的结果中我们不难发现,普通语言学中常见的概念或思想,如语言和言语、静态和动态的分类以及音位等,我们在博杜恩的论文中基本都能找到相对应的表述。本研究参考了博杜恩和索绪尔文献中的大量论述,最后可以发现博杜恩是普通语言学理论的先驱,索绪尔的语言学观点与之相比并不具有鲜明的创新性,后者的贡献应更多地体现在对普通语言学理论的系统整理和传播方面。本研究主要包含三部分的内容:1.考察索绪尔与博杜恩语言学比对的缘起,探讨索绪尔语言学思想借鉴博杜恩的可能性,具体包括三个方面:(1)索绪尔个人学术创作的成果以及精神状态;(2)《普通语言学教程》的产生基础和过程;(3)博杜恩与索绪尔二者的学术往来。2.对索绪尔与博杜恩具体语言学思想进行比对,分别在语言学研究对象及其与其他学科的关系、语言和言语及静态与动态、语言符号观、语言系统观、语音学以及语言和文字的关系六个方面进行比对,考察索绪尔与博杜恩具体语言学思想的异同。3.概括索绪尔与博杜恩语言学思想在学界的影响,分析造成二者语言学影响方面差异的原因,对目前语言学界对索绪尔个人成就的评价进行反思和重新定位。本研究以索绪尔与博杜恩的相关论述为基础,论证二者语言学思想的相似性,这样得出的结论较为可靠,利于呈现博杜恩在现代语言学方面的成就。本研究采用直接来源与背景影响相结合,个人贡献与学术历史相结合的方法,强调在历史影响下的个人研究贡献,利于更加客观地评价某位学者或某语言学理论在语言学史上的贡献或地位。
[Abstract]:Saussure has always been recognized as the "father of modern linguistics" in the field of linguistics, but in fact, before Saussure, Polish-Russian linguist Bodun has put forward the core viewpoint of the theory of general linguistics. Through the collation and interpretation of Bodun's thought of general linguistics, we find that there are many similarities between Bodun and Saussure's theory of linguistics, and Bodun has more foresight in the thought of general linguistics. This has forced us to question the originality of Saussure's linguistic thought and to re-examine his linguistic contributions and his position in the history of linguistics. This study mainly refers to the course of General Linguistics (translated by Gao Mingkai), the manuscript of General Linguistics (collated by Yu Xiuying) and the Collection of Proceedings of General Linguistics (translated by Yang Yanchun). Saussure and Bodun's linguistic thoughts are collated and compared in order to reveal the similarities of their linguistic theories. It is not difficult to find out from the results of comparison that some common concepts or ideas in general linguistics, such as language and speech, static and dynamic classification and phonemes, can basically be expressed in Bodun's paper. This study refers to a large number of references in the literature of Bodun and Saussure. Finally, it can be found that Bodun is the forerunner of general linguistic theory, and Saussure's linguistic view is not obviously innovative. The latter's contribution should be reflected in the systematic arrangement and dissemination of general linguistic theories. This research mainly includes three parts: 1. This paper investigates the origin of Saussure's linguistic comparison with Bodun's linguistics, and discusses the possibility of Saussure's linguistic thought drawing lessons from Bodun's thought, including three aspects: (1) Saussure's achievements in academic creation and his mental state; (2) the foundation and process of the course of Common Linguistics, (3) the academic contacts between Bodun and Saussure. This paper compares Saussure's specific linguistic thoughts with Bodun's, and compares them in linguistic research objects and their relationship with other disciplines, language and speech, static and dynamic, linguistic symbols, linguistic systems, etc. By comparing the six aspects of phonetics and the relationship between language and writing, this paper examines the similarities and differences between Saussure and Bodun's specific linguistic thoughts. This paper summarizes the influence of Saussure's and Bodun's linguistic thoughts on the academic field, analyzes the causes of their differences in linguistic influence, and rethinks and reorientates the current evaluation of Saussure's personal achievements in the field of linguistics. This study is based on Saussure and Bodun's related argumentation to demonstrate the similarities of their linguistic ideas. The conclusion is relatively reliable, which is conducive to the presentation of Bodun's achievements in modern linguistics. In this study, the direct source and background influence, personal contribution and academic history are combined to emphasize the contribution of individual research under the influence of history. It is helpful to evaluate more objectively the contribution or status of a certain scholar or linguistic theory in the history of linguistics.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H0-0
本文编号：2321524
[Abstract]:Saussure has always been recognized as the "father of modern linguistics" in the field of linguistics, but in fact, before Saussure, Polish-Russian linguist Bodun has put forward the core viewpoint of the theory of general linguistics. Through the collation and interpretation of Bodun's thought of general linguistics, we find that there are many similarities between Bodun and Saussure's theory of linguistics, and Bodun has more foresight in the thought of general linguistics. This has forced us to question the originality of Saussure's linguistic thought and to re-examine his linguistic contributions and his position in the history of linguistics. This study mainly refers to the course of General Linguistics (translated by Gao Mingkai), the manuscript of General Linguistics (collated by Yu Xiuying) and the Collection of Proceedings of General Linguistics (translated by Yang Yanchun). Saussure and Bodun's linguistic thoughts are collated and compared in order to reveal the similarities of their linguistic theories. It is not difficult to find out from the results of comparison that some common concepts or ideas in general linguistics, such as language and speech, static and dynamic classification and phonemes, can basically be expressed in Bodun's paper. This study refers to a large number of references in the literature of Bodun and Saussure. Finally, it can be found that Bodun is the forerunner of general linguistic theory, and Saussure's linguistic view is not obviously innovative. The latter's contribution should be reflected in the systematic arrangement and dissemination of general linguistic theories. This research mainly includes three parts: 1. This paper investigates the origin of Saussure's linguistic comparison with Bodun's linguistics, and discusses the possibility of Saussure's linguistic thought drawing lessons from Bodun's thought, including three aspects: (1) Saussure's achievements in academic creation and his mental state; (2) the foundation and process of the course of Common Linguistics, (3) the academic contacts between Bodun and Saussure. This paper compares Saussure's specific linguistic thoughts with Bodun's, and compares them in linguistic research objects and their relationship with other disciplines, language and speech, static and dynamic, linguistic symbols, linguistic systems, etc. By comparing the six aspects of phonetics and the relationship between language and writing, this paper examines the similarities and differences between Saussure and Bodun's specific linguistic thoughts. This paper summarizes the influence of Saussure's and Bodun's linguistic thoughts on the academic field, analyzes the causes of their differences in linguistic influence, and rethinks and reorientates the current evaluation of Saussure's personal achievements in the field of linguistics. This study is based on Saussure and Bodun's related argumentation to demonstrate the similarities of their linguistic ideas. The conclusion is relatively reliable, which is conducive to the presentation of Bodun's achievements in modern linguistics. In this study, the direct source and background influence, personal contribution and academic history are combined to emphasize the contribution of individual research under the influence of history. It is helpful to evaluate more objectively the contribution or status of a certain scholar or linguistic theory in the history of linguistics.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H0-0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨衍春;;试论博杜恩·德·库尔德内与索绪尔学术思想的一致性[J];俄罗斯文艺;2016年01期
2 谢刚;吕明臣;;通向语言的本质:索绪尔与胡塞尔语言哲学比较研究[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2015年04期
3 卢德平;;符号任意性理论溯源:从惠特尼到索绪尔（英文）[J];符号与传媒;2015年01期
4 冯志伟;;现代语言学的奠基人索绪尔——纪念索绪尔逝世101周年[J];现代语文(语言研究版);2015年03期
5 聂志平;;关于索绪尔《普通语言学教程》研究的两个问题[J];浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版);2015年02期
6 曾银环;;浅析索绪尔语言学研究中的结构主义特征[J];青年文学家;2014年23期
7 聂志平;;20世纪国内索绪尔语言理论研究述评(下)[J];通化师范学院学报;2014年05期
8 聂志平;;20世纪国内索绪尔语言理论研究述评(上)[J];通化师范学院学报;2014年03期
9 叶起昌;赵新;;历时与共时中“时”之追问——索绪尔的“时间”解读[J];外语学刊;2014年02期
10 张静;;博杜恩·德·库尔德内及其普通语言学理论[J];文学教育(下);2013年11期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 赵宏宇;索绪尔语言学理论对西方20世纪文学批评理论的影响[D];上海交通大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 韩彤;索绪尔语言学理论研究[D];燕山大学;2010年
2 朱蓓蓓;博杜恩·德·库尔特内的语言思想[D];吉林大学;2007年
，本文编号：2321524
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2321524.html
