西方理性主义视角下的语言天赋之争

发布时间：2019-02-14 21:31

【摘要】：语言天赋之争源起于哲学界对人类知识来源的探究。关于语言机制问题的理性思辨虽然能启迪人类的探究能力,却自始至终都只是引发争论的假设,因为思辨终需得到科学的全面印证。目前,从句法、语义、逻辑、直觉语义或认知心理视角提出的语言理论,虽然各有其自身的合理性,却没有哪种理论能全面地解开人类习得语言之谜。要解决人类习得语言的初始机制、语言知识的构成和句法递归性的核心争论,研究者们有必要回到思辨假设与神经科学相互印证的整体性途径上来,因为人类语言本身是最高级、最复杂的现象。解密语言机制的途径取决于人脑科学、生物遗传学和神经心理学等学科的发展,人类利用事件相关电位和功能性磁共振成像等最新科技辅助手段探究语言机制,对于弥合争论具有理论和应用方面的指引性参考价值。
[Abstract]:The dispute of language talent originates from the exploration of the source of human knowledge in the field of philosophy. Although rational speculation about language mechanism can enlighten human beings' ability of inquiry, it is only a hypothesis that causes controversy from beginning to end, because it needs to be verified comprehensively by science. At present, language theories proposed from syntactic, semantic, logical, intuitive or cognitive psychological perspectives have their own rationality, but no theory can fully solve the riddle of human language acquisition. In order to solve the core debate about the initial mechanism of human language acquisition, the structure of language knowledge and syntactic recursion, it is necessary for researchers to return to the holistic approach of mutual validation between speculative hypothesis and neuroscience. Because human language itself is the most advanced, the most complex phenomenon. The way to decrypt language mechanisms depends on the development of subjects such as human brain science, biogenetics and neuropsychology. Humans use the latest scientific aids such as event-related potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore language mechanisms. It has the guiding reference value in theory and application for bridging the controversy.
【作者单位】：湖南师范大学公共管理学院;湖南商学院外国语学院;
【基金】：湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目“最简方案框架下现代汉语空语类研究”(2011WLH58)
【分类号】：H0-05

【相似文献】